I do like my assumption that repro techno allows “misogyny” to reproduce in ways it hasn’t yet.
Techno got us in, and techno will have to get us out.
It is not a certainty that we will win though. …What type of creature man will be by the time “men’s” victory is achieved etc? I have not seen male dominant hives (how ever one might define “male dominance”).
(Someone once said to me about that (a dame from soc men, so it is probably one of these dames here with new nym) “is that light up ahead the end of the tunnel or the train?…)
But note we also have never seen other chimps leave orbit either. …Behold the beast man… How like a God.
So…
We must balance –like a dancing bear– on a runaway snowball.
We can’t all just run away and “join the Amish” as our way of pulling out the plug on civi/femi. …The quilt is not big enough.
…And most crucially those that don’t run away will simply claim “eminent domain” trump card [over the Amish and other Luddites] at _their leisure_.
I’m thinking that as repro techno starts to negate female sex value it creates opportunity for “misogyny” to pass on like never before in history. Not to mention generations of children raised without female “nurturing” in their heads.
The males who can’t allow that “misogyny” –say those that make daughters etc (ehem)– have to be marginalized by more of the same techno HOPEFULLY IF/WHEN.
And that is the real battle right there actually.
Showing posts with label Solutions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Solutions. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Alpha beta confusion.
Alpha beta confusion.
People are exhibiting confusion about how the ABGamma principle should be used. It is like this...
The class in charge might be seen as chihuahua-like (or poodle like or what have you). Ie seen as runts of the old wolf strain from which we all come. Therefore they are beta or gamma by internal fortitude.
But as for the ABGamma coup cycle itself right now, they are the "alpha class" who is ever poised to be ousted. (They will be ousted unless they employ counter strategy.)
The beta class (which might be ye olde "alpha" by internal fortitude) will try to rile up the gamma and then oust those 'alpha' douche bag SOBs. (...And put them out of their runt misery. Right down to their Florsheims and Bostonians.)
(And then we --the beta class-- will betray the gamma cannon fodder (some of which will become the new beta). ...Unless the whole ABG cycle stops. [see "below"])
So ending this ABG confusion comes down to whether one is using the ABG principle to describe evolution OR sociology. IF evolution, ABG tries to talk about our descended fortitude (or lack thereof) --and how it got to be [coup cycle of techno created and supported runts ousting lone fortitude]; if one is talking about modern sociology, ABG tries to talk about... how tasseled your shoes are (with the Florsheim shoe wearing runts on top of this upside down world we have).
(I envisioned ABGamm more as an evolutionary model. A techno fueled coup cycle explaining how the Chihuahua took over [and replaced] our once upon a time wolf breed. I really didn't mean for it to be used for every time a dude has more stuff and thus gets laid more than someone else. But alas the sexually successful is the latest "alpha" class and as such susceptible to the continuing coup cycle.)
***********
[Here you are "below"]
How does ABG stop? By understanding "politics"...
Politics is...
In childhood, "difference" and "loss" (eg caste division) as a root.
"Difference" even means down to birth order differences in personality (which are determinist creations --whether nature or nurture caused). ["Determinism" simply means domino chain reaction on the scale of the universe (billiard bank shots ever ecru-ing)--whether those domino effects are "genes" or "environments".] Birth order too means even whether boy or girl was first born etc.
[Solution to that: Only child males and as first borns; one plot of land shared with father who dies while junior becomes a father to his son. (Immortality techno is on horizon though.)]
Also the root of politics is the biochemical modules that unwittingly chemically compel us all towards hunger, greed, envy, lust.
Those modules have been selected by the universe's main fact: "limited/finite energy".
On the scale of dim sex reproduction, 'limited energy' means 'fem sex value'. In short, we fight over pu$$y; but that's too glib though. We fight 'cause we are compelled to; those "compellings" have been selected BY food/ sex bottlenecks. female "dalliance" instinct and head-games instinct --ie their emotional abuse of us-- is part of that.
...Has to be grappled with and dealt with. ...Even if boys and girls WERE "equal"; which we aint.
[solution= artificial womb (which leads to extinction of double X ers); or zero sexual mobility for females (ankle collars etc)--they stay on the one plot of land of husband in perpetuum (no access to other males); multiple wives to decrease pussy leverage; 'marry' em young so as to keep them(the females) stunted under our male level of "niceness"/childishness which we as males demand of each other.]
Certainly health differences/defects would create differences and inevitable caste (and the inevitable bench-warmer axe to grind ressentiment ;-) )
[Solution: along with only-son first borns, medical/cloning tech to ensure optimum health. ...Use to be called "eugenics" through necessity.]
Then the amount of resources/ land for those healthy surviving, "properly nurtured" sires needs to be squared. ...Not enough plots (deemed to be equal in productivity /size etc)? Then... there will be blood. And, given the way humans compete[groups], ABGamma coups would start again.
The only thing that would prevent that ABG cycle again, other than stopping all competition over difference, loss, hunger, greed, envy, lust, pussy-mind fuck, 'unequal' land-plots, bad nurture syndromes-- would be fatal-dueling as the competition ALWAYS, without technology allowing coalitions or "runt fortitude" to prevail.
All the above, in detail, has to be thought about and controlled. No more "kissing things up to god" now that we see. 'Kissing up to god' would be like closing your eyes and crossing the hiway even though we now know that traffic is there.
And be warned, the Universe itself has a tendency to want to create coalitions. Dust coalesces to stars, to cells to multi cellular, to hives to elaborate parasitic symbiosis. So what probably happens here is man replaces himself with machines, for they are the best possible tools of war --ie the best children.
(So the devil wins this round. ...God goes "you sunk my battleship. [gobsmack] Let's play again, but this time you take New Jersey!")
Now I know you all don't like me --and that's fine: I never met a people I could stomach. (Maybe if I cooked them longer. ...hmmm.) So trust, me I hate you first and hate you better. And many of you can't get me: you'll just have to look to your leaders to understand for you. But I'm still right any way: I am very, very good at this.
Man must start to get his mind around this stuff, if his centuries old utopia bullshit (millenia old actually) about a new way[tm] is to be taken seriously as anything more than just ploy and tactic (of the latest ABG coup, with its inevitable hypocritical "here come the new boss same as the old" ...minus a pecker).
People are exhibiting confusion about how the ABGamma principle should be used. It is like this...
The class in charge might be seen as chihuahua-like (or poodle like or what have you). Ie seen as runts of the old wolf strain from which we all come. Therefore they are beta or gamma by internal fortitude.
But as for the ABGamma coup cycle itself right now, they are the "alpha class" who is ever poised to be ousted. (They will be ousted unless they employ counter strategy.)
The beta class (which might be ye olde "alpha" by internal fortitude) will try to rile up the gamma and then oust those 'alpha' douche bag SOBs. (...And put them out of their runt misery. Right down to their Florsheims and Bostonians.)
(And then we --the beta class-- will betray the gamma cannon fodder (some of which will become the new beta). ...Unless the whole ABG cycle stops. [see "below"])
So ending this ABG confusion comes down to whether one is using the ABG principle to describe evolution OR sociology. IF evolution, ABG tries to talk about our descended fortitude (or lack thereof) --and how it got to be [coup cycle of techno created and supported runts ousting lone fortitude]; if one is talking about modern sociology, ABG tries to talk about... how tasseled your shoes are (with the Florsheim shoe wearing runts on top of this upside down world we have).
(I envisioned ABGamm more as an evolutionary model. A techno fueled coup cycle explaining how the Chihuahua took over [and replaced] our once upon a time wolf breed. I really didn't mean for it to be used for every time a dude has more stuff and thus gets laid more than someone else. But alas the sexually successful is the latest "alpha" class and as such susceptible to the continuing coup cycle.)
***********
[Here you are "below"]
How does ABG stop? By understanding "politics"...
Politics is...
In childhood, "difference" and "loss" (eg caste division) as a root.
"Difference" even means down to birth order differences in personality (which are determinist creations --whether nature or nurture caused). ["Determinism" simply means domino chain reaction on the scale of the universe (billiard bank shots ever ecru-ing)--whether those domino effects are "genes" or "environments".] Birth order too means even whether boy or girl was first born etc.
[Solution to that: Only child males and as first borns; one plot of land shared with father who dies while junior becomes a father to his son. (Immortality techno is on horizon though.)]
Also the root of politics is the biochemical modules that unwittingly chemically compel us all towards hunger, greed, envy, lust.
Those modules have been selected by the universe's main fact: "limited/finite energy".
On the scale of dim sex reproduction, 'limited energy' means 'fem sex value'. In short, we fight over pu$$y; but that's too glib though. We fight 'cause we are compelled to; those "compellings" have been selected BY food/ sex bottlenecks. female "dalliance" instinct and head-games instinct --ie their emotional abuse of us-- is part of that.
...Has to be grappled with and dealt with. ...Even if boys and girls WERE "equal"; which we aint.
[solution= artificial womb (which leads to extinction of double X ers); or zero sexual mobility for females (ankle collars etc)--they stay on the one plot of land of husband in perpetuum (no access to other males); multiple wives to decrease pussy leverage; 'marry' em young so as to keep them(the females) stunted under our male level of "niceness"/childishness which we as males demand of each other.]
Certainly health differences/defects would create differences and inevitable caste (and the inevitable bench-warmer axe to grind ressentiment ;-) )
[Solution: along with only-son first borns, medical/cloning tech to ensure optimum health. ...Use to be called "eugenics" through necessity.]
Then the amount of resources/ land for those healthy surviving, "properly nurtured" sires needs to be squared. ...Not enough plots (deemed to be equal in productivity /size etc)? Then... there will be blood. And, given the way humans compete[groups], ABGamma coups would start again.
The only thing that would prevent that ABG cycle again, other than stopping all competition over difference, loss, hunger, greed, envy, lust, pussy-mind fuck, 'unequal' land-plots, bad nurture syndromes-- would be fatal-dueling as the competition ALWAYS, without technology allowing coalitions or "runt fortitude" to prevail.
All the above, in detail, has to be thought about and controlled. No more "kissing things up to god" now that we see. 'Kissing up to god' would be like closing your eyes and crossing the hiway even though we now know that traffic is there.
And be warned, the Universe itself has a tendency to want to create coalitions. Dust coalesces to stars, to cells to multi cellular, to hives to elaborate parasitic symbiosis. So what probably happens here is man replaces himself with machines, for they are the best possible tools of war --ie the best children.
(So the devil wins this round. ...God goes "you sunk my battleship. [gobsmack] Let's play again, but this time you take New Jersey!")
Now I know you all don't like me --and that's fine: I never met a people I could stomach. (Maybe if I cooked them longer. ...hmmm.) So trust, me I hate you first and hate you better. And many of you can't get me: you'll just have to look to your leaders to understand for you. But I'm still right any way: I am very, very good at this.
Man must start to get his mind around this stuff, if his centuries old utopia bullshit (millenia old actually) about a new way[tm] is to be taken seriously as anything more than just ploy and tactic (of the latest ABG coup, with its inevitable hypocritical "here come the new boss same as the old" ...minus a pecker).
Sunday, January 9, 2011
Solutions
IQ tests in childhood and then marginalization of the those with IQs below say 120 ish solves ALL problems.
Also tests in childhood for "future tense perception / honesty" with marginalization of those who don't cut muster solves all problems.
If not, the neo cortex become extinct, as mankind turns itself into a hive of drones filled with all of the once fought-against "oppressions" necessary for such dynamics to prevail.
===========
=======
Morality is a chemical chain reaction. (Like love or hate or jealously etc.) It (they) can be understood potentially. (Observe lab rat studies.)
Serial killers don't kill because they are "immoral" or "evil". They do because they have different chemicals in them; those chemical differences have been shaped by nature/nurture dominoe effects over the serial killer's formation. (The nurture part of that domino equation is the more complicated more profound part actually.)
Well take that extreme serial killer example/model and apply it to anything else in the behavior realm.
Alcoholics or fat people or _whatever._
Note lab rats injected with this or that chemical --or having various environmentally induced stresses applied -- have their behavior patterns fundamentally changed. They become cuddlier or cannibalistic just by tweaking their hormones etc or shaping childhood contingencies.
You have small minds and are not getting your minds around this.
Also as far as "philosophies" for why we do what we do... An _honest_ understanding of nature --"naturalism"-- will put things in perspective.
Eg teens don't fight or vandalize because they haven't found god yet. They are sexual pubescents attempting to establish sexual maturity/territory.
Or another example, "the evil other is coming to take me away he he, ha ha; the evil god must 'ave sent them to hurt our good god." We now understand these could be food supply/contentment/population etc issues (along with the above sexual territory desire), as we all migrate around writing a tale from our own perspective and seeing everyone else in OUR storyline as two dimensional in THEIR motivations --ie evil-- unlike us.
Religion based morality has failed to understand and solve the things it wants to understand and solve.
Next... The claim that "science is trying to make us all the same/ trying to alleviate or micro-control every ouchy." ...Well the deep-felt demand for alleviation is already there. That is why there is the plastic surgery industry; the diet book business; the remedial tutoring business etc, etc. Those methods are just sloppier at addressing this need.
As Star Trek's Dr McCoy said, "[It was barbaric, Jim (referring to 20th Cent medicine): cutting into people with things they called scalpels.]"
I understand that science will probably screw up this potential deep-understanding of how 'we' work... `cause humans suck. But it isn't like religion hasn't already failed at understanding any of this too.
As for the claim "scientists /atheists are just looking for excuses to have authority"... Well, There is no such thing as a world without someone/some group having the trump-say and/or winning (through one mechanism or another). That's all cross-canceled out stuff.
Now a bad thing to say about scientists/atheists... This panacea of edumacation will NEVER work. Hence my handle at salon.com.
(LetTheNuclearCullingBegin)
Also tests in childhood for "future tense perception / honesty" with marginalization of those who don't cut muster solves all problems.
If not, the neo cortex become extinct, as mankind turns itself into a hive of drones filled with all of the once fought-against "oppressions" necessary for such dynamics to prevail.
===========
=======
Morality is a chemical chain reaction. (Like love or hate or jealously etc.) It (they) can be understood potentially. (Observe lab rat studies.)
Serial killers don't kill because they are "immoral" or "evil". They do because they have different chemicals in them; those chemical differences have been shaped by nature/nurture dominoe effects over the serial killer's formation. (The nurture part of that domino equation is the more complicated more profound part actually.)
Well take that extreme serial killer example/model and apply it to anything else in the behavior realm.
Alcoholics or fat people or _whatever._
Note lab rats injected with this or that chemical --or having various environmentally induced stresses applied -- have their behavior patterns fundamentally changed. They become cuddlier or cannibalistic just by tweaking their hormones etc or shaping childhood contingencies.
You have small minds and are not getting your minds around this.
Also as far as "philosophies" for why we do what we do... An _honest_ understanding of nature --"naturalism"-- will put things in perspective.
Eg teens don't fight or vandalize because they haven't found god yet. They are sexual pubescents attempting to establish sexual maturity/territory.
Or another example, "the evil other is coming to take me away he he, ha ha; the evil god must 'ave sent them to hurt our good god." We now understand these could be food supply/contentment/population etc issues (along with the above sexual territory desire), as we all migrate around writing a tale from our own perspective and seeing everyone else in OUR storyline as two dimensional in THEIR motivations --ie evil-- unlike us.
Religion based morality has failed to understand and solve the things it wants to understand and solve.
Next... The claim that "science is trying to make us all the same/ trying to alleviate or micro-control every ouchy." ...Well the deep-felt demand for alleviation is already there. That is why there is the plastic surgery industry; the diet book business; the remedial tutoring business etc, etc. Those methods are just sloppier at addressing this need.
As Star Trek's Dr McCoy said, "[It was barbaric, Jim (referring to 20th Cent medicine): cutting into people with things they called scalpels.]"
I understand that science will probably screw up this potential deep-understanding of how 'we' work... `cause humans suck. But it isn't like religion hasn't already failed at understanding any of this too.
As for the claim "scientists /atheists are just looking for excuses to have authority"... Well, There is no such thing as a world without someone/some group having the trump-say and/or winning (through one mechanism or another). That's all cross-canceled out stuff.
Now a bad thing to say about scientists/atheists... This panacea of edumacation will NEVER work. Hence my handle at salon.com.
(LetTheNuclearCullingBegin)
Friday, January 7, 2011
Solution
Micro communities (ultimately on space platforms), father to only-son land handoff and bio tech making people so similar they are as machines, zero sexual mobility for fem sex value to artificial womb/female breeding.
The only solution. (More “equality/freedom/rights” schpiel is flat-earther talk; it is not a solution.)
======
This "diversity is good because it allows some humans to continue" is a warped lens like 'matriarchies of the past' is. A successful academic spreading meme that is wrong.
I'd rather focus man's energies on _curing_ disease rather than letting the diseases have their way with just "some" of us. I don't want man to just be grist for the natural selection mill.
"Diversity is good" ultimately means chaff. (Not to mention Balkanized civil wars forever as new 'races' form and grapple.)
---------
Changing what society calls illness is as wishful as "just say no" politics. Cure it or terminate.
The logic of "acceptance" could apply to any difference /illness/dysfunction in the species.
By letting every variant live we are just creating new Balkanized "races" and a demand for new protection apparatus. Life=Zero sum game; One loses.
====
=========
Anti fem so far is a "doomed venture".
So people go back to profiteering behind some other mask; or to furiously masturbating to the internet.
The sky is turning red. The rains will come next: The hibernating frogs will come out of their sand holes and gribbit the days and nights away. ...The politicking bureaucrat type will organize "donations"; the warriors will run and outflank and kill in all their glory; executioners will execute.
"Conciousness" still isn't raised enough. Not to mention perspicacious aptitude is still too low among the set. False --and failed --notions still abound. "Doomed venture" implication is thus seen by those with perspicacity.
A "critical mass" has not been achieved yet. Lightning rods [leaders] don't go up until storm clouds gather(murmurings in the crowd --followers). Without those storm clouds, a lightning rod is just a boar in a bar.
============
What if the guy being politically reeducated in your slapping story above was a feminist white knight mangina?
What if political reeducation was the only way to stop that guy?
================
There is nothing wrong with males being one tenth the population. The problem is it's the WRONG one tenth(idiots fools animals etc) the machine is breeding for.
============
As an evil socialist social engineer elite-- I want to prevent birth order effects which create much or most of the caste issues and personalities difference between people (thus hindering clarity, scope and consensus).
=============
We simply need a revolution to CULL society of every last being that supports such feminsit /equality gibberish.
High tech military support-- at least a plurality of it --will be necessary.
============
Homeschooling can be now done through the computer. Find the best teacher of a thing (only like one per town or whatever) and have them teach EVERYONE one else through making a video class. That is better than warehousing 30 brats in a pecking order in some classroom.
==============
The whole regime of western culture needs to be ousted. (And trust me it is men. Dumb brunette males en masse; they're in everything.)
The repubs will not stop any of this. That is a false hope. And not enough people will vote for 3rd party "independents".
======================
Feminsim /liberalism all goes away once the so called right understands that killing is good; Abortion is good; eugenics is good; so called darwinism is rightist and good; fascist-socialism is good; that we come from a "patriarchy of the past" made matriarchal through technology-civilization-jebus cult-capitalism-"growth"-democracy.
Until that understanding happens, there is no reason for the BETTER MEN to lead anyone.
So back to masturbating to the internet.
Death to democracy.
Testing and sterilization.
=================
Child brides.
I very much believe the age of "consent" should be lowered to historical levels for females. (Puberty.)
That is the only real way to stop feminism [and the feminists know that], since feminism is simply the inevitable results of females "maturing" in this culture of effete git males. (Ie civilization.)
[And the feminists know that too.]
The fact that you types don't understand that or advocate that says all ones needs to know about how you will never, ever, never --in million, gazillion --years ever stop feminism. Ever. Even if you clammer for a tax break everyday 24/7 super loud you won't stop feminism.
And you know why? 'Cause you are retarded for genetic reasons. It is what civilization breeds for. If not for civi your ilk--all of you-- would be long dead in battle over breeding rights. [And the feminists kinda get that too... Though they really only one mindedly understand gender stuff, then they fall right off the cliff of insight.]
===============
We should have arranged marriage again. "Sympathetic romance" is another failed Euro invented policy, going back almost ages (in some quarters).
===========
...no woman deserves to be beaten"
Wrong. And 'beaten' is interesting choice of words.
===============
You don't believe in killing an enemy that is enslaving you?
===============
Magic won't work. Because magic/god aint real.
But loopy fems think magic is real. And therefore having them think we are using magic against them will work. Ie made-obvious spells towards them will work. (Note witches hate you wearing black and red.)
(God is less real than magic; ie it is possible to have a mystical plane of activity without any of our god beliefs being real.)
=========
If at that time "we" don't advocate a strong state _purposly and vehemently suppressing certain freedoms and classes/breeds,_ we will be right here again.
=============
I say we support feminist's goal of dismantling the _american_ R&D community.
The men in power know that it is suicide to play games with US R&D science tech. So they diverted the females away from it. They patted wimmins on the head.
I say we join forces with our "sisters" and expose the sexist congress for marginalizing the females and their important "equality in science & tech" agenda at once!
Then we can move on to helping females become most the of the military too. It is more than about time!
When will this outrage against wimmins end?!!
Call your congressthing now!!
More wimmin in the military and police now!
Make the west put up or shut up...
Betcha can't...
====================
Christianity and anti feminism are NOT synonymous. Feminism means feminism nothing more and nothing less.
The only solution. (More “equality/freedom/rights” schpiel is flat-earther talk; it is not a solution.)
======
This "diversity is good because it allows some humans to continue" is a warped lens like 'matriarchies of the past' is. A successful academic spreading meme that is wrong.
I'd rather focus man's energies on _curing_ disease rather than letting the diseases have their way with just "some" of us. I don't want man to just be grist for the natural selection mill.
"Diversity is good" ultimately means chaff. (Not to mention Balkanized civil wars forever as new 'races' form and grapple.)
---------
Changing what society calls illness is as wishful as "just say no" politics. Cure it or terminate.
The logic of "acceptance" could apply to any difference /illness/dysfunction in the species.
By letting every variant live we are just creating new Balkanized "races" and a demand for new protection apparatus. Life=Zero sum game; One loses.
====
=========
Anti fem so far is a "doomed venture".
So people go back to profiteering behind some other mask; or to furiously masturbating to the internet.
The sky is turning red. The rains will come next: The hibernating frogs will come out of their sand holes and gribbit the days and nights away. ...The politicking bureaucrat type will organize "donations"; the warriors will run and outflank and kill in all their glory; executioners will execute.
"Conciousness" still isn't raised enough. Not to mention perspicacious aptitude is still too low among the set. False --and failed --notions still abound. "Doomed venture" implication is thus seen by those with perspicacity.
A "critical mass" has not been achieved yet. Lightning rods [leaders] don't go up until storm clouds gather(murmurings in the crowd --followers). Without those storm clouds, a lightning rod is just a boar in a bar.
============
What if the guy being politically reeducated in your slapping story above was a feminist white knight mangina?
What if political reeducation was the only way to stop that guy?
================
There is nothing wrong with males being one tenth the population. The problem is it's the WRONG one tenth(idiots fools animals etc) the machine is breeding for.
============
As an evil socialist social engineer elite-- I want to prevent birth order effects which create much or most of the caste issues and personalities difference between people (thus hindering clarity, scope and consensus).
=============
We simply need a revolution to CULL society of every last being that supports such feminsit /equality gibberish.
High tech military support-- at least a plurality of it --will be necessary.
============
Homeschooling can be now done through the computer. Find the best teacher of a thing (only like one per town or whatever) and have them teach EVERYONE one else through making a video class. That is better than warehousing 30 brats in a pecking order in some classroom.
==============
The whole regime of western culture needs to be ousted. (And trust me it is men. Dumb brunette males en masse; they're in everything.)
The repubs will not stop any of this. That is a false hope. And not enough people will vote for 3rd party "independents".
======================
Feminsim /liberalism all goes away once the so called right understands that killing is good; Abortion is good; eugenics is good; so called darwinism is rightist and good; fascist-socialism is good; that we come from a "patriarchy of the past" made matriarchal through technology-civilization-jebus cult-capitalism-"growth"-democracy.
Until that understanding happens, there is no reason for the BETTER MEN to lead anyone.
So back to masturbating to the internet.
Death to democracy.
Testing and sterilization.
=================
Child brides.
I very much believe the age of "consent" should be lowered to historical levels for females. (Puberty.)
That is the only real way to stop feminism [and the feminists know that], since feminism is simply the inevitable results of females "maturing" in this culture of effete git males. (Ie civilization.)
[And the feminists know that too.]
The fact that you types don't understand that or advocate that says all ones needs to know about how you will never, ever, never --in million, gazillion --years ever stop feminism. Ever. Even if you clammer for a tax break everyday 24/7 super loud you won't stop feminism.
And you know why? 'Cause you are retarded for genetic reasons. It is what civilization breeds for. If not for civi your ilk--all of you-- would be long dead in battle over breeding rights. [And the feminists kinda get that too... Though they really only one mindedly understand gender stuff, then they fall right off the cliff of insight.]
===============
We should have arranged marriage again. "Sympathetic romance" is another failed Euro invented policy, going back almost ages (in some quarters).
===========
...no woman deserves to be beaten"
Wrong. And 'beaten' is interesting choice of words.
===============
You don't believe in killing an enemy that is enslaving you?
===============
Magic won't work. Because magic/god aint real.
But loopy fems think magic is real. And therefore having them think we are using magic against them will work. Ie made-obvious spells towards them will work. (Note witches hate you wearing black and red.)
(God is less real than magic; ie it is possible to have a mystical plane of activity without any of our god beliefs being real.)
=========
If at that time "we" don't advocate a strong state _purposly and vehemently suppressing certain freedoms and classes/breeds,_ we will be right here again.
=============
I say we support feminist's goal of dismantling the _american_ R&D community.
The men in power know that it is suicide to play games with US R&D science tech. So they diverted the females away from it. They patted wimmins on the head.
I say we join forces with our "sisters" and expose the sexist congress for marginalizing the females and their important "equality in science & tech" agenda at once!
Then we can move on to helping females become most the of the military too. It is more than about time!
When will this outrage against wimmins end?!!
Call your congressthing now!!
More wimmin in the military and police now!
Make the west put up or shut up...
Betcha can't...
====================
Christianity and anti feminism are NOT synonymous. Feminism means feminism nothing more and nothing less.
Thursday, September 2, 2010
Solutions
I walk the line, for you... bab-bee.
A thousand miles..., for you.
[I think I'm all out of fair use there.]
____________________________
=========================
SOLUTIONS
A basic principle is amoral determinism. [Indifference and cause and effect.] All that law and constitution and all that jazz is just bullshit for the small minded and con artists.
===========
Men defining themselves as dogs for women's sleds... It is important that men break away from that mind set. It is that mind set that under girded, allowed and promoted feminism originally (mixed with jewish occupational explotive political triangulations with the fems against the the host culture males). It is what under girds it now.
===============
You want to stop liberal stuff?
Okay then you have to stop american "freedom" horseshit first. All that capitalism nonsense and that christ absurdity and the romanticizing the founders and all that republican hooey needs to be dead.
Then liberalism dies that instant.
The reason liberal hypocrisy thrives is because that which is embraced as oppositional to liberalism is actually the pillar structure of liberalism. Always has been. But apparently people are too brain dead to get that. Very curious.
=========
The conservatives are good dumb-beast sacrifices that will help us get dems and liberals (where thought [sometimes grand] and policy comes from) over to our side.
At the very least, why would any thinking --or yes even feeling-- man want to tie himself to that anchor [that is head in hole conservatism and easily demonizable greed]?
==============
How much do you have invested in this system? Male conformity/honor-duty compulsion is all. The system itself is to blame, not any one policy or administration.
============
Liberals should note that there is no reason to liberate female dalliance tendency and their stupidty just to lessen the breeding of idiots. Note population as a whole has increased during female emancipation; just like rampant sexual objectification (of both genders) has. Also other deemed wrongs that were supposed to be solved by liberalism have.
Why can't we control population growth and keep females from cheating (and etc stuff) too?
Same for jebus cult: why is the only way to stop female leverage deemed none self aware kiss-it-up-to-god-ism?
Shooting people in the face would reduce birth rates too. Or as Monty Python said "having your balls removed" would too. So would a lot of things.
=============
If you want to create a good breed you have to cull for it.
But because jebus culture is such a _disaster of moronic thumb sucking gits, no one gets that_.
============
There should be only female intel field operatives. Same with only female cops and firemen and helicopter pilots and the like. Oh and only female aircraft carrier commanders.
Death to democracy.
==============
I say bio tech to make everyone the same. And a protectionist plank platform in order to win power enough to get there. Note that "Individualism"/colonialism/entrepreneurial ism/ etc' will never win power against protectionism; ever. Never has and never will. (And humans are inherently in protectionist bands; they are called tribes/troops.) There are various profound reasons for why individualism/capitalism becomes part of a _false dichotomy two party system_ and for why 'we' pretend that it is oppositional to the culture it carries but it has never held sway in any of the approx one HUNDRED countries it has been advocated in even once.
=============
Someone needs to make a kennedy-like speech about getting the next great task done. (I'm not addressing whether or not kennedy is good or a fraud. I mean the galvanizing speech towards big aim.) Instead of the moon launch or bombing 3rd world anti fem it needs to be about genome research and etc bio tech and starting to solve the human condition for everyone.
It is good and important that male studies is trying to get off the ground; I'm not confident though--either its ability or sincerity/honesty. Men's perspective is key, key, crucially needed in solving these woes; It needs to necessarily contradict and CO -OPT the female rap. (Garner sympathy from but at the same time assert how bad that garnering is, given the tendency females have towards discriminatory blood thirsty (true) shit test game playing, where they hate male weakness like males hate female back hair.)
=============
IQ 120s are the oligarchy of modern society; the middle men.
Using the horde of hapless 110s and 100s (and the crude and probably supra vicious 90s) --rallied up through protectionism--to get rid of the oligarchy of liars and con artist who have taken over in the last few centuries (the true beta males of the previous species we come from) would end "liberalism" where it lives.
You don't understand because you --ALL OF YOU-- don't get the alpha beta gamma thing I started. It is not about one's studliness at the thumpa thumpa club (steady girls). It is about the general caste structure of this species as lensed through our understanding of primates. Our species is in a caste structure of IQ 130-145s then IQ 115s to 130s an then IQ 100ish at the bottom. The middle class (115s -130) there has used protectionist demagoguery so as to rally the 100s against the the 137ish thus turning our world upside down.
The jew migrants --ie the "marxist"-- were relevent, in that they were the main 120 something protectionist demagogues --the recent beta along with the upper irish-- who ousted the order of the previous 19th century era. ...And now academia is "marxist", with the "darwinists" all since fired. You types don't know that stuff because it all happened over your heads for class reasons; meaning you aint got none.
So when I say "get rid of the 120s" I mean get rid of the modern western oligarchy --the pretenders to the thrones of authority. The "beta" (whether or not they "pull" cunt at the club); whether they have good jobs and game or not.
Also there is no way to get rid of the majority outright (90-110 makes up about 65 % of the culture!): the majority must be used (ie rallied through protectionism) to oust the ruling class (of 120ish sophist conspirator demagogues who ousted the darwinists who were and are smarter).
Then Transhumanism will happen. Tough titties. There is no way to get around the fact that christianity --especially protestant nuttery--is doomed (and has been for centuries) no matter whether marxism or darwinism prevails here. These cult nutjobs HIDING in the stycks that we call america might try to keep their heads up their asses but it isn't impressing anyone. It has however prevented the "darwinists" from keeping the snowballing liberal zeitgeist coup (regardless of "party") out of power.
=============
Fem says: "The desire to lower the age of consent is so they can mold the knave to their liking."
What's wrong with molding the girl?
People are molded from knaves all the time. It is what school is for. It is what TV is for. It is what the family is for. And it is what the modern single fem family does.
What specifically is the problem with molding young girls to be more submissive to, loyal to and respectful towards men?
How does one stop feminism without such a program?
===============
...The arbitrary unfairness of ignoring lovers of the same age when one is more manipulatively self aware and vengeful then the other. The laws about consent are ostensibly there to protect the naive from the wolf; but it is more often than not that the naive is a teen boy being played* by his cheating girl (who is often a few years younger than him --by her choice).
(*"played" = emotionally abused pretty severly actually. We just don't accept this as truth while at the same time telling the boys to suck it up.)
===============
Are you 'morally' prepared to kill off the men and females who create feminism?
Are you prepared to create state/church/institutionally mandated tariffs to keep the pro fem type of [nature/nurture created] male and female from forming again?
=======================
It is fine to learn, girl.
But then... your penance is to dissuade other men out there of their whiteknighting tendencies by making them understand that wimmin are not pristine, faultless fallen angels (in what ever category-of-the-day is being discussed); that females have an assortment of instincts and thus can be very cruel, deceptive, manipulative, non self aware, childish and downright abusive in many categories.
Then go ye forth and sin no more.
===========
The fathers should have trump card say.
It is all part the american anti authority thing that compels us otherwise. We won't be young forever, you know: we become fathers eventually.
If we take power away from the ho and power away from the father, who is left? The 19 year old's penis --and the mawms [adult wimmins]. Sounds similar to what we have now.
============
"Human rights" is --just like equality and ALL OF THE OTHER RIGHTS BLABBER --just made up nonsense created by the runt moralists so as to get rid of the better males from childhood.
=============
Many simply need to be dead _for being the wrong package of modules (compulsions)_ (like getting rid of dog strains from the litter that are not desired, so as to create a better breed). That isn't happening because of capitalist democracy and chrisendumb.
=============
Testing and sterilizing those below say IQ 120 solves most problems.
Eugenics now!
Protectionism to achieve power. Political theartah (symbols and such) so as to rally the conformist horde/ military muscle. Then impose your policies --Testing and sterilization of the dolts. (This isn't rocket science.)
=================
Early on the females should have been banned from our "thought space" rather than given their own space and having men's space be communal.
=======
INFIDELITY
The knowing party(ies) should be accountable for infidelity only. A dupe trying to get laid didn't do anything wrong or disrespectful to the jilted boyfriend/husband.
The males who can't grasp that --the ones who need to vent on the nearest male-- need to be _culled out_.
===========
RE: STONING
If you infantilize society you stand the chance of liberating females(who are repulsed by and prone to dominate infantiles).
The females will then cheat rampantly "legally". Then "80 percent of the females will be doing 20 percent of the dudes." Females will be self entitled, oblivious to and unreachable about this and the boys will still do the work and be told to just shut up and go along.
That is the quandry that arises when stopping the old ways.
------------
And the commentators are confused over what to do to stop stoning.
You breed for new modules as far as getting rid of the sadists.
You'll still need to cull for cheaters too then.
For both cullings, use lethal injection to eliminate. Or personality controlling chemicals to change.
============
--------------------
============
There is no such thing as a world without "social Darwinism".
There is such a thing however as self awareness or ignorance. The "anti Darwinists" would have us all be ignorant of how things actually work.
================
[Question by someone:] "Is there a balance between shutting women in their homes and giving them license to wreck society and trample on the lives of those around them?"
No, there is none. Dimorphic sexuality is emasculation(thus creating creating females); And then consequenting female hyper value.
Dem's the facts. (Censored, convoluted-up, tortured and just plain squashed as they are.)
[Question by someone:] "I suspect that this will be one of the most difficult questions to answer, and we may have to put a great deal of effort into working it out."
The destiny is quite simple:
The under health males kept alive by human material success will continue to triangulate with females as their way of getting rid of the healthier males from childhood. Once that is achieved (as it has been in the west for all intents and purposes) the new 'social sexual dynamic' (ie "mating ritual" or mating dance /display) created between the runt males and the "liberated" females (liberated by the elimination of the healthy who previously kept the females in line /emasculated) will be a male immolation dynamic of one stripe or another as payment to fem sex value (ala praying mantis like or etc).
One way or another, males will pay to fem sex value: either males will kill each other off in battles created by fem sex value and then the winner males (his wide-lens libido) will pick and emasculate [ie "rape" or "child molest" if you will] females (thus creating females in the process, for more softwired organisms, eg mollusks or etc); or the males will protect themselves from those culling battles by giving the power of choice to the females --who will then "eat" (take energy from, in one way or another) the winner males.
Eventually if the neo cortex survives (which might be doubtful, since females and runts don't really have it) gender itself will be eliminated in favor of hermaphrodites or Asexual clones.
And even without any of that, Mankind or "humanity" will voluntarily replace itself --numbers wise--with machines. (Meaning silicon and iron and such rather than the types of machines that organisms are already.) The reason it will be "voluntarily" (rather than a robot coup, ala Hollywood) is those machines will make much better progeny (tools of war --the 'spearheads' of the multi generational lances-- against the other lineages) than the biologic types we rely on now to pull it all off and carry it all on.
All of that has been going on since before Rome but really ramped up after Rome's fall and the jesus cult diaspora. I know you all think I'm crazy or mean or such. But I'm simply smarter than you --I see more clearly than you : You all lack layers of cerebrum; meaning it's like you're color blind and the electromagnetic phenomenon called green simply can't trigger your "green receptor color cones"(molecules on the retina) which respond to the electromag contingency-- "green" -- `cause you ain't got green receptors.
Ie you is dumb.
===========
We need to convince civilization's mechanism (specialists) to try and make men equal at the biological level [enter the machine clone progeny?] --because men are the true victims of society (always have been --that's why men are as strong as they are) and redistribute the real wealth --_pu$$y_-- which is the core wealth that motivates all the other competition, "inequality" and disparity, pain and suffering between men.
Men are not fighting over money: they are fighting over pu$$y. Money is simply an abstract measuring stick for seeing who's next in line to get some.
So long as Free Range Pussy exists there will never be "equality" between men. Pu$$y would never stand for it!
But if we could get men the same and pussy in check, well...
It is like that Steve Martin caveman bit from the old Saturday Night Live. After the hunt he says, (and this is all paraphrase from memory) "listen instead of just eating the thing why don't we save it and catch another one tomorrow and then we can mate them and have a steady supply of food forever? This way we will have free-ed up energy that will allow us to do great things: build structures and invent and then develop profound philosophies that allow us to truly understand it all since we won't just be chasing these things[food] around all day every day."
The dumb thick and furrow browed chief looks at him and goes "you smart. We will sleep now and think more on this tomorrow."
The tribe all turns to go set up their sleeping spots.
Loraine Neuman is one of the cave bitches; absurdly thick browed. She stayed behind by Steve Martin CaveMan as the others were turning to leave and she goes to him "duh, um... you make me wet." [big laugh]
The dumb chief who had already turned to leave but was still in ear shot sees this and he is not happy.
Steve nods 'oh, thank you' or similar to Loraine cave bitch. They then-- Loraine and Steve-- turn to go with the others.
The tribe is asleep now. Steve Caveman is asleep at his spot.
The chief sneakily gets up from his spot and skulks over to where Steve is sleeping. He then proceeds to bash Steve CaveMan in the head with a rock until dead.
The chief then stands, pounds his chest and goes "And now I am smart".
And... scene!
-------------------------
Well if we could get FRP (free range pussy) in check, we wouldn't have to chase these things(Pu$$y) around all day. That would free up energy to... to do great things...
Like replace ourselves with machines.
Or just sit in a pile of filth and fuck our in-check nieces all day...
So there you go. Simple.
Good luck.
==============
"Equality for Men is not something that should ever be desired, any more than Equality between the sexes.
Both ideas are expressions of the same Liberal Revolt agaisnt Reality, and the same perverse mental illness."
Inequality between men is the reason they fight. That fight has LED INEVITABLY to LIBERALISM and FEMINISM.
To prevent that from happening --after 'we' win the war to stop lib and fem (as if)-- the root problem itself has to be solved.
You are simply a very primitive thinker. ...Reason number 6 thousand, 4 hundred and fifty 2 you should be in alliance with islam against the likes of me. But you can't get yourself out of the tangles that have confused you all.
==============
The so called rebelling minorities of the 60s were not white adult men trying to upset the pu$$y status quo of the elites. The "rebels" were the equivalent of the children, wives and pets of the ruling class. They got away with it and were given things for the same reason a crying baby or begging puppy does and is.
"This won't be won politically. A revolution is needed."
Correct.
Grand triangulations and realignments...
The N koreans; and chinese; islam; domestic black; and the latest ethnics.
Keep the GOP --the muscle and wallet of liberalism --out of power. The liberal big tent will then faction along internal fissures. The us --and britn (brit to US : Greece to Rome)-- will be unable to impose anywhere and will shrink and then implode hopefully under external pushes.
But that simply gets us --mankind-- back to zero. Next time the "problem" itself needs to be solved once and for all.
...Our understanding of determinism --Nature, Darwinism-- or whatever you want to call it-- allows us to get to the root of it all...
Female sexual value and 'Alpha beta gamma coup d eta' rooted in have and have not and loss. (I've explained it many times.)
======================
When fem says "77 cents on the dollar" I say back "the only reason men work at all is to balance out female sexual value."
That won't work at first BECAUSE THE ANGLO WORLD (AMERICA) IS DEEP DEEP DEEP WITH _THUMB SUCKING RETARD GITS_ ("MEN" and christians I believe are the polite terms). But if you keep at it --as I have for the last 15 years-- eventually you RETARDED THUMB SUCKING GITS catch on to how naturalism works.
Another: Libs scream how many wimmins aren't allowed abortions (which in an of itself is a lie); I say back that there aren't enough abortions yet.
Another... Feminists and git pyscho-babble masculinists say "females are hurt by 'social symbols' (eg Gilligan's Island's Maryanne in short-shorts causes females to be too dumb to go to NASA)." I say back males are far worse off than females[bullet list enters here which I don't do] and since we are to believe social signals have power to create 'nurture syndromes' inducing underachievement than we have to accept that there are hurtful to boys symbols coming from on high (which we have _obvious evidence for everywhere_ unlike the bald face lie that females are under siege from "patriarchal symbols") . And also females are just naturally dumb for genetic reasons; genes _selected_ by our tribal past. ([Followed up by: "I aint looking for votes and I don't believe in the democracy equality gibberish.")
Fems stats about violence and etc. I say "those are liberal protected groups (ethnics and poor) not the white patriarchy. And those stats are evidence for how democracy is bad --ie how men are NOT equal-- not evidence for how men are bad and wimmins (golden, no doubt [sarc]) deserve special one-up privileges." ("Not to mention liberal hypocrites stereotype men with a broad brush and then advocate unconstitutional discriminatory policy.") (Not that I would lower myself to even wiping my ass with the constitution and the like.)
And etc etc.
Basically just watch the way I've done it here (when I have energy to engage).
Tanks and planes blow open stuck trench warfare debates.
I don't know if it will work.
I do know that western Anglo Conservationism HAS NOT worked.
Testing and sterilization. (Or water posioning and etc.)
We have too many git males that used to die but now thrive.
That is why feminism INEVITABLY happened.
my "alpha beta gamma principle" tries to explain.
We have snowballed over the generations into a place (through AlphaBG coup cycles), where masculine behavior --which creates and controls fem behavior--is taboo/"criminal". It is that that is emboldening the females; ie that which is creating "feminism".
=============
Females are not intellectually and physically equal with males.
They are the key catalysts for competition (and the consequent stress, pain and suffering, and disparity).
They have childish manipulative, deceptive, two faced, secretive, discriminatory, complain-based* characters. (*cracking-the-whip technique.)
They are way over privileged under the law --and always have been.
Dim sex is an emasculation battle.
There is no such thing as equal or any of that modern cult talk.
None of that is "hatred."
As I tried to explain earlier, understanding yucky truth[tm] is not sociopathy; _creating solutions that accept the yucky truth as starting point is not sociopathy._
Well the same goes for pu$$y and this misogyny/hatred cry. Accurate interpretation of society, history, mating dance and female character and aptitude --and the history of dim sex itself-- is not "hatred". Likewise creating solutions that accept that yucky truth as starting point is not hatred.
(Or if you must, hatred has its roll: self defense. I "hate" it when a bear mauls me; I kind of hate the bear. Tying up a bear is not "hatred". (I don't actually believe in cruelty to animals. But that is not the point. The point is the animal is bad and needs to be tethered. It is not "hate" when the mauled attempt tethering.))
"Morality" demagoguery (eg denouncing people who see clearly as 'sociopaths' or 'haters') has always been the way nerds/monks have controlled and shaped society over to their liking.
Indeed psycho babble diagnosis --ie made up nonsense which is just pulled out of the ass-- is the way the latest runtdom/monkdom (called liberalism) controls society now.
===================
I believe we need more "sociopaths".
Sociopathy being an arbitrary construct...
Yes bio chemistries are recognizably different. But the definitions of "criminally insane" and sociopathy or anything like that are ARBITRARY. There is no such biological diagnosis. It is purely legalistic political funny business that by purposeful legalistic design ignores existential (surrounding issue) prerequisites.
Observe: I believe it is sociopathy to NOT abort. I believe the biochemistries that CAN'T see it that way ARE recognizably biologically different from "good people"; I deem these bio types criminally insane sociopaths. It is sociopathy to let idiots breed.
=================
We shouldn't forfeit the protectionism planks when they are the only ones that have ever won power in any system no less a system that has institutionalized demagogic protectionism.
=================
Why give the females a pass on the root discrimination that motivates all the competition and have and have-not in the world when the female movement doesn't allow the same discrimination against ugly chicks without making it a battle cry ["looks-ism" and "objectification"] and demanding change which specifically seeks to take away that male power to discriminate --even though males are already instinctually less discriminatory than the females in this very catagory of who fucks who?
Why give the female whole a pass when they do not reciprocate in kind? Indeed males ignoring the wall flowers is the original impetus for this wave of "la femme mystique" in the last 150 years we call feminism.
============
MESSAGE TO GIRLIES:
You have had sex with a man?
Meaning you get off on a man fucking you doggy style holding your hips and telling you he is going to cum ("so hold still you little creature") while you give a guttural moan into the pillow your face is in as he fills you?
If you don't want that, you understand that you are rare right? What are you going to do with all the people who do like it that way?
And if you do like it that way, saying well "that is just sex--I meant submit in social and political, legal type circles" is not good enough. The reason it is not good enough is most of your female libido is psychological. You get off on the whole scene not just the acute physical (this is wrong?). If the creature fucking you is not someone you respect (and I mean respect as a "better" an authority figure --not just some goofy word from a song) you won't be liking him enough or liking him using you like that.
And also (and this is important), if the male isn't prevented from being a creature who is better than you by the state, he naturally will be better often [except runts, which I want to ameliorate through tech]. But if the state is preventing men from being better, then it is making them submit.
So men will be submitting. Therefore your whole "nobody should submit to anyone" thing is empty, ill thought through nonsense. Especially ill thought through when one factors in that as the state prevents men from naturally displaying in ways that normal females desire, the female will start shunning them and/or moving in to treat them dominantly.
So how can females not submit to men in a system that doesn't coerce men into submission? How can wimmin be free from this submission to men without a state that makes men submit?
Again, your whole "nobody should submit to anyone" thing is empty and ill thought through.
...The female human is a non sentient child. That is my professional diagnosis. The stuff that comes out of her mouth just sounds like words, so as to trick men into providing for her expert parasitism (like a baby).
females are not broad minded, outside looking in thinkers. More like colicky babies on instinct. They will cry till the milk is gone or somebody plays deaf to them and lets them cry themselves out one time.
Do you really believe that female humans are intellectuality and physically "equal" with the best men? If not --ie if you do believe wimmin lack something some men have-- should the female submit to those men?
===========
I do know the 'devil is in the details'. ...Sitting right next to the females and the specialists.
A thousand miles..., for you.
[I think I'm all out of fair use there.]
____________________________
=========================
SOLUTIONS
A basic principle is amoral determinism. [Indifference and cause and effect.] All that law and constitution and all that jazz is just bullshit for the small minded and con artists.
===========
Men defining themselves as dogs for women's sleds... It is important that men break away from that mind set. It is that mind set that under girded, allowed and promoted feminism originally (mixed with jewish occupational explotive political triangulations with the fems against the the host culture males). It is what under girds it now.
===============
You want to stop liberal stuff?
Okay then you have to stop american "freedom" horseshit first. All that capitalism nonsense and that christ absurdity and the romanticizing the founders and all that republican hooey needs to be dead.
Then liberalism dies that instant.
The reason liberal hypocrisy thrives is because that which is embraced as oppositional to liberalism is actually the pillar structure of liberalism. Always has been. But apparently people are too brain dead to get that. Very curious.
=========
The conservatives are good dumb-beast sacrifices that will help us get dems and liberals (where thought [sometimes grand] and policy comes from) over to our side.
At the very least, why would any thinking --or yes even feeling-- man want to tie himself to that anchor [that is head in hole conservatism and easily demonizable greed]?
==============
How much do you have invested in this system? Male conformity/honor-duty compulsion is all. The system itself is to blame, not any one policy or administration.
============
Liberals should note that there is no reason to liberate female dalliance tendency and their stupidty just to lessen the breeding of idiots. Note population as a whole has increased during female emancipation; just like rampant sexual objectification (of both genders) has. Also other deemed wrongs that were supposed to be solved by liberalism have.
Why can't we control population growth and keep females from cheating (and etc stuff) too?
Same for jebus cult: why is the only way to stop female leverage deemed none self aware kiss-it-up-to-god-ism?
Shooting people in the face would reduce birth rates too. Or as Monty Python said "having your balls removed" would too. So would a lot of things.
=============
If you want to create a good breed you have to cull for it.
But because jebus culture is such a _disaster of moronic thumb sucking gits, no one gets that_.
============
There should be only female intel field operatives. Same with only female cops and firemen and helicopter pilots and the like. Oh and only female aircraft carrier commanders.
Death to democracy.
==============
I say bio tech to make everyone the same. And a protectionist plank platform in order to win power enough to get there. Note that "Individualism"/colonialism/entrepreneurial ism/ etc' will never win power against protectionism; ever. Never has and never will. (And humans are inherently in protectionist bands; they are called tribes/troops.) There are various profound reasons for why individualism/capitalism becomes part of a _false dichotomy two party system_ and for why 'we' pretend that it is oppositional to the culture it carries but it has never held sway in any of the approx one HUNDRED countries it has been advocated in even once.
=============
Someone needs to make a kennedy-like speech about getting the next great task done. (I'm not addressing whether or not kennedy is good or a fraud. I mean the galvanizing speech towards big aim.) Instead of the moon launch or bombing 3rd world anti fem it needs to be about genome research and etc bio tech and starting to solve the human condition for everyone.
It is good and important that male studies is trying to get off the ground; I'm not confident though--either its ability or sincerity/honesty. Men's perspective is key, key, crucially needed in solving these woes; It needs to necessarily contradict and CO -OPT the female rap. (Garner sympathy from but at the same time assert how bad that garnering is, given the tendency females have towards discriminatory blood thirsty (true) shit test game playing, where they hate male weakness like males hate female back hair.)
=============
IQ 120s are the oligarchy of modern society; the middle men.
Using the horde of hapless 110s and 100s (and the crude and probably supra vicious 90s) --rallied up through protectionism--to get rid of the oligarchy of liars and con artist who have taken over in the last few centuries (the true beta males of the previous species we come from) would end "liberalism" where it lives.
You don't understand because you --ALL OF YOU-- don't get the alpha beta gamma thing I started. It is not about one's studliness at the thumpa thumpa club (steady girls). It is about the general caste structure of this species as lensed through our understanding of primates. Our species is in a caste structure of IQ 130-145s then IQ 115s to 130s an then IQ 100ish at the bottom. The middle class (115s -130) there has used protectionist demagoguery so as to rally the 100s against the the 137ish thus turning our world upside down.
The jew migrants --ie the "marxist"-- were relevent, in that they were the main 120 something protectionist demagogues --the recent beta along with the upper irish-- who ousted the order of the previous 19th century era. ...And now academia is "marxist", with the "darwinists" all since fired. You types don't know that stuff because it all happened over your heads for class reasons; meaning you aint got none.
So when I say "get rid of the 120s" I mean get rid of the modern western oligarchy --the pretenders to the thrones of authority. The "beta" (whether or not they "pull" cunt at the club); whether they have good jobs and game or not.
Also there is no way to get rid of the majority outright (90-110 makes up about 65 % of the culture!): the majority must be used (ie rallied through protectionism) to oust the ruling class (of 120ish sophist conspirator demagogues who ousted the darwinists who were and are smarter).
Then Transhumanism will happen. Tough titties. There is no way to get around the fact that christianity --especially protestant nuttery--is doomed (and has been for centuries) no matter whether marxism or darwinism prevails here. These cult nutjobs HIDING in the stycks that we call america might try to keep their heads up their asses but it isn't impressing anyone. It has however prevented the "darwinists" from keeping the snowballing liberal zeitgeist coup (regardless of "party") out of power.
=============
Fem says: "The desire to lower the age of consent is so they can mold the knave to their liking."
What's wrong with molding the girl?
People are molded from knaves all the time. It is what school is for. It is what TV is for. It is what the family is for. And it is what the modern single fem family does.
What specifically is the problem with molding young girls to be more submissive to, loyal to and respectful towards men?
How does one stop feminism without such a program?
===============
...The arbitrary unfairness of ignoring lovers of the same age when one is more manipulatively self aware and vengeful then the other. The laws about consent are ostensibly there to protect the naive from the wolf; but it is more often than not that the naive is a teen boy being played* by his cheating girl (who is often a few years younger than him --by her choice).
(*"played" = emotionally abused pretty severly actually. We just don't accept this as truth while at the same time telling the boys to suck it up.)
===============
Are you 'morally' prepared to kill off the men and females who create feminism?
Are you prepared to create state/church/institutionally mandated tariffs to keep the pro fem type of [nature/nurture created] male and female from forming again?
=======================
It is fine to learn, girl.
But then... your penance is to dissuade other men out there of their whiteknighting tendencies by making them understand that wimmin are not pristine, faultless fallen angels (in what ever category-of-the-day is being discussed); that females have an assortment of instincts and thus can be very cruel, deceptive, manipulative, non self aware, childish and downright abusive in many categories.
Then go ye forth and sin no more.
===========
The fathers should have trump card say.
It is all part the american anti authority thing that compels us otherwise. We won't be young forever, you know: we become fathers eventually.
If we take power away from the ho and power away from the father, who is left? The 19 year old's penis --and the mawms [adult wimmins]. Sounds similar to what we have now.
============
"Human rights" is --just like equality and ALL OF THE OTHER RIGHTS BLABBER --just made up nonsense created by the runt moralists so as to get rid of the better males from childhood.
=============
Many simply need to be dead _for being the wrong package of modules (compulsions)_ (like getting rid of dog strains from the litter that are not desired, so as to create a better breed). That isn't happening because of capitalist democracy and chrisendumb.
=============
Testing and sterilizing those below say IQ 120 solves most problems.
Eugenics now!
Protectionism to achieve power. Political theartah (symbols and such) so as to rally the conformist horde/ military muscle. Then impose your policies --Testing and sterilization of the dolts. (This isn't rocket science.)
=================
Early on the females should have been banned from our "thought space" rather than given their own space and having men's space be communal.
=======
INFIDELITY
The knowing party(ies) should be accountable for infidelity only. A dupe trying to get laid didn't do anything wrong or disrespectful to the jilted boyfriend/husband.
The males who can't grasp that --the ones who need to vent on the nearest male-- need to be _culled out_.
===========
RE: STONING
If you infantilize society you stand the chance of liberating females(who are repulsed by and prone to dominate infantiles).
The females will then cheat rampantly "legally". Then "80 percent of the females will be doing 20 percent of the dudes." Females will be self entitled, oblivious to and unreachable about this and the boys will still do the work and be told to just shut up and go along.
That is the quandry that arises when stopping the old ways.
------------
And the commentators are confused over what to do to stop stoning.
You breed for new modules as far as getting rid of the sadists.
You'll still need to cull for cheaters too then.
For both cullings, use lethal injection to eliminate. Or personality controlling chemicals to change.
============
--------------------
============
There is no such thing as a world without "social Darwinism".
There is such a thing however as self awareness or ignorance. The "anti Darwinists" would have us all be ignorant of how things actually work.
================
[Question by someone:] "Is there a balance between shutting women in their homes and giving them license to wreck society and trample on the lives of those around them?"
No, there is none. Dimorphic sexuality is emasculation(thus creating creating females); And then consequenting female hyper value.
Dem's the facts. (Censored, convoluted-up, tortured and just plain squashed as they are.)
[Question by someone:] "I suspect that this will be one of the most difficult questions to answer, and we may have to put a great deal of effort into working it out."
The destiny is quite simple:
The under health males kept alive by human material success will continue to triangulate with females as their way of getting rid of the healthier males from childhood. Once that is achieved (as it has been in the west for all intents and purposes) the new 'social sexual dynamic' (ie "mating ritual" or mating dance /display) created between the runt males and the "liberated" females (liberated by the elimination of the healthy who previously kept the females in line /emasculated) will be a male immolation dynamic of one stripe or another as payment to fem sex value (ala praying mantis like or etc).
One way or another, males will pay to fem sex value: either males will kill each other off in battles created by fem sex value and then the winner males (his wide-lens libido) will pick and emasculate [ie "rape" or "child molest" if you will] females (thus creating females in the process, for more softwired organisms, eg mollusks or etc); or the males will protect themselves from those culling battles by giving the power of choice to the females --who will then "eat" (take energy from, in one way or another) the winner males.
Eventually if the neo cortex survives (which might be doubtful, since females and runts don't really have it) gender itself will be eliminated in favor of hermaphrodites or Asexual clones.
And even without any of that, Mankind or "humanity" will voluntarily replace itself --numbers wise--with machines. (Meaning silicon and iron and such rather than the types of machines that organisms are already.) The reason it will be "voluntarily" (rather than a robot coup, ala Hollywood) is those machines will make much better progeny (tools of war --the 'spearheads' of the multi generational lances-- against the other lineages) than the biologic types we rely on now to pull it all off and carry it all on.
All of that has been going on since before Rome but really ramped up after Rome's fall and the jesus cult diaspora. I know you all think I'm crazy or mean or such. But I'm simply smarter than you --I see more clearly than you : You all lack layers of cerebrum; meaning it's like you're color blind and the electromagnetic phenomenon called green simply can't trigger your "green receptor color cones"(molecules on the retina) which respond to the electromag contingency-- "green" -- `cause you ain't got green receptors.
Ie you is dumb.
===========
We need to convince civilization's mechanism (specialists) to try and make men equal at the biological level [enter the machine clone progeny?] --because men are the true victims of society (always have been --that's why men are as strong as they are) and redistribute the real wealth --_pu$$y_-- which is the core wealth that motivates all the other competition, "inequality" and disparity, pain and suffering between men.
Men are not fighting over money: they are fighting over pu$$y. Money is simply an abstract measuring stick for seeing who's next in line to get some.
So long as Free Range Pussy exists there will never be "equality" between men. Pu$$y would never stand for it!
But if we could get men the same and pussy in check, well...
It is like that Steve Martin caveman bit from the old Saturday Night Live. After the hunt he says, (and this is all paraphrase from memory) "listen instead of just eating the thing why don't we save it and catch another one tomorrow and then we can mate them and have a steady supply of food forever? This way we will have free-ed up energy that will allow us to do great things: build structures and invent and then develop profound philosophies that allow us to truly understand it all since we won't just be chasing these things[food] around all day every day."
The dumb thick and furrow browed chief looks at him and goes "you smart. We will sleep now and think more on this tomorrow."
The tribe all turns to go set up their sleeping spots.
Loraine Neuman is one of the cave bitches; absurdly thick browed. She stayed behind by Steve Martin CaveMan as the others were turning to leave and she goes to him "duh, um... you make me wet." [big laugh]
The dumb chief who had already turned to leave but was still in ear shot sees this and he is not happy.
Steve nods 'oh, thank you' or similar to Loraine cave bitch. They then-- Loraine and Steve-- turn to go with the others.
The tribe is asleep now. Steve Caveman is asleep at his spot.
The chief sneakily gets up from his spot and skulks over to where Steve is sleeping. He then proceeds to bash Steve CaveMan in the head with a rock until dead.
The chief then stands, pounds his chest and goes "And now I am smart".
And... scene!
-------------------------
Well if we could get FRP (free range pussy) in check, we wouldn't have to chase these things(Pu$$y) around all day. That would free up energy to... to do great things...
Like replace ourselves with machines.
Or just sit in a pile of filth and fuck our in-check nieces all day...
So there you go. Simple.
Good luck.
==============
"Equality for Men is not something that should ever be desired, any more than Equality between the sexes.
Both ideas are expressions of the same Liberal Revolt agaisnt Reality, and the same perverse mental illness."
Inequality between men is the reason they fight. That fight has LED INEVITABLY to LIBERALISM and FEMINISM.
To prevent that from happening --after 'we' win the war to stop lib and fem (as if)-- the root problem itself has to be solved.
You are simply a very primitive thinker. ...Reason number 6 thousand, 4 hundred and fifty 2 you should be in alliance with islam against the likes of me. But you can't get yourself out of the tangles that have confused you all.
==============
The so called rebelling minorities of the 60s were not white adult men trying to upset the pu$$y status quo of the elites. The "rebels" were the equivalent of the children, wives and pets of the ruling class. They got away with it and were given things for the same reason a crying baby or begging puppy does and is.
"This won't be won politically. A revolution is needed."
Correct.
Grand triangulations and realignments...
The N koreans; and chinese; islam; domestic black; and the latest ethnics.
Keep the GOP --the muscle and wallet of liberalism --out of power. The liberal big tent will then faction along internal fissures. The us --and britn (brit to US : Greece to Rome)-- will be unable to impose anywhere and will shrink and then implode hopefully under external pushes.
But that simply gets us --mankind-- back to zero. Next time the "problem" itself needs to be solved once and for all.
...Our understanding of determinism --Nature, Darwinism-- or whatever you want to call it-- allows us to get to the root of it all...
Female sexual value and 'Alpha beta gamma coup d eta' rooted in have and have not and loss. (I've explained it many times.)
======================
Can you give some examples on how shifting the reasoning would work?
When fem says "77 cents on the dollar" I say back "the only reason men work at all is to balance out female sexual value."
That won't work at first BECAUSE THE ANGLO WORLD (AMERICA) IS DEEP DEEP DEEP WITH _THUMB SUCKING RETARD GITS_ ("MEN" and christians I believe are the polite terms). But if you keep at it --as I have for the last 15 years-- eventually you RETARDED THUMB SUCKING GITS catch on to how naturalism works.
Another: Libs scream how many wimmins aren't allowed abortions (which in an of itself is a lie); I say back that there aren't enough abortions yet.
Another... Feminists and git pyscho-babble masculinists say "females are hurt by 'social symbols' (eg Gilligan's Island's Maryanne in short-shorts causes females to be too dumb to go to NASA)." I say back males are far worse off than females[bullet list enters here which I don't do] and since we are to believe social signals have power to create 'nurture syndromes' inducing underachievement than we have to accept that there are hurtful to boys symbols coming from on high (which we have _obvious evidence for everywhere_ unlike the bald face lie that females are under siege from "patriarchal symbols") . And also females are just naturally dumb for genetic reasons; genes _selected_ by our tribal past. ([Followed up by: "I aint looking for votes and I don't believe in the democracy equality gibberish.")
Fems stats about violence and etc. I say "those are liberal protected groups (ethnics and poor) not the white patriarchy. And those stats are evidence for how democracy is bad --ie how men are NOT equal-- not evidence for how men are bad and wimmins (golden, no doubt [sarc]) deserve special one-up privileges." ("Not to mention liberal hypocrites stereotype men with a broad brush and then advocate unconstitutional discriminatory policy.") (Not that I would lower myself to even wiping my ass with the constitution and the like.)
And etc etc.
Basically just watch the way I've done it here (when I have energy to engage).
Tanks and planes blow open stuck trench warfare debates.
I don't know if it will work.
I do know that western Anglo Conservationism HAS NOT worked.
Testing and sterilization. (Or water posioning and etc.)
We have too many git males that used to die but now thrive.
That is why feminism INEVITABLY happened.
my "alpha beta gamma principle" tries to explain.
We have snowballed over the generations into a place (through AlphaBG coup cycles), where masculine behavior --which creates and controls fem behavior--is taboo/"criminal". It is that that is emboldening the females; ie that which is creating "feminism".
=============
Females are not intellectually and physically equal with males.
They are the key catalysts for competition (and the consequent stress, pain and suffering, and disparity).
They have childish manipulative, deceptive, two faced, secretive, discriminatory, complain-based* characters. (*cracking-the-whip technique.)
They are way over privileged under the law --and always have been.
Dim sex is an emasculation battle.
There is no such thing as equal or any of that modern cult talk.
None of that is "hatred."
As I tried to explain earlier, understanding yucky truth[tm] is not sociopathy; _creating solutions that accept the yucky truth as starting point is not sociopathy._
Well the same goes for pu$$y and this misogyny/hatred cry. Accurate interpretation of society, history, mating dance and female character and aptitude --and the history of dim sex itself-- is not "hatred". Likewise creating solutions that accept that yucky truth as starting point is not hatred.
(Or if you must, hatred has its roll: self defense. I "hate" it when a bear mauls me; I kind of hate the bear. Tying up a bear is not "hatred". (I don't actually believe in cruelty to animals. But that is not the point. The point is the animal is bad and needs to be tethered. It is not "hate" when the mauled attempt tethering.))
"Morality" demagoguery (eg denouncing people who see clearly as 'sociopaths' or 'haters') has always been the way nerds/monks have controlled and shaped society over to their liking.
Indeed psycho babble diagnosis --ie made up nonsense which is just pulled out of the ass-- is the way the latest runtdom/monkdom (called liberalism) controls society now.
===================
I believe we need more "sociopaths".
Sociopathy being an arbitrary construct...
Yes bio chemistries are recognizably different. But the definitions of "criminally insane" and sociopathy or anything like that are ARBITRARY. There is no such biological diagnosis. It is purely legalistic political funny business that by purposeful legalistic design ignores existential (surrounding issue) prerequisites.
Observe: I believe it is sociopathy to NOT abort. I believe the biochemistries that CAN'T see it that way ARE recognizably biologically different from "good people"; I deem these bio types criminally insane sociopaths. It is sociopathy to let idiots breed.
=================
We shouldn't forfeit the protectionism planks when they are the only ones that have ever won power in any system no less a system that has institutionalized demagogic protectionism.
=================
Why give the females a pass on the root discrimination that motivates all the competition and have and have-not in the world when the female movement doesn't allow the same discrimination against ugly chicks without making it a battle cry ["looks-ism" and "objectification"] and demanding change which specifically seeks to take away that male power to discriminate --even though males are already instinctually less discriminatory than the females in this very catagory of who fucks who?
Why give the female whole a pass when they do not reciprocate in kind? Indeed males ignoring the wall flowers is the original impetus for this wave of "la femme mystique" in the last 150 years we call feminism.
============
MESSAGE TO GIRLIES:
You have had sex with a man?
Meaning you get off on a man fucking you doggy style holding your hips and telling you he is going to cum ("so hold still you little creature") while you give a guttural moan into the pillow your face is in as he fills you?
If you don't want that, you understand that you are rare right? What are you going to do with all the people who do like it that way?
And if you do like it that way, saying well "that is just sex--I meant submit in social and political, legal type circles" is not good enough. The reason it is not good enough is most of your female libido is psychological. You get off on the whole scene not just the acute physical (this is wrong?). If the creature fucking you is not someone you respect (and I mean respect as a "better" an authority figure --not just some goofy word from a song) you won't be liking him enough or liking him using you like that.
And also (and this is important), if the male isn't prevented from being a creature who is better than you by the state, he naturally will be better often [except runts, which I want to ameliorate through tech]. But if the state is preventing men from being better, then it is making them submit.
So men will be submitting. Therefore your whole "nobody should submit to anyone" thing is empty, ill thought through nonsense. Especially ill thought through when one factors in that as the state prevents men from naturally displaying in ways that normal females desire, the female will start shunning them and/or moving in to treat them dominantly.
So how can females not submit to men in a system that doesn't coerce men into submission? How can wimmin be free from this submission to men without a state that makes men submit?
Again, your whole "nobody should submit to anyone" thing is empty and ill thought through.
...The female human is a non sentient child. That is my professional diagnosis. The stuff that comes out of her mouth just sounds like words, so as to trick men into providing for her expert parasitism (like a baby).
females are not broad minded, outside looking in thinkers. More like colicky babies on instinct. They will cry till the milk is gone or somebody plays deaf to them and lets them cry themselves out one time.
Do you really believe that female humans are intellectuality and physically "equal" with the best men? If not --ie if you do believe wimmin lack something some men have-- should the female submit to those men?
===========
I do know the 'devil is in the details'. ...Sitting right next to the females and the specialists.
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Some solutions and observations
Luxuriating in the afterglow...
-----------
I believe Western culture needs to eliminate the bad blood/breeds that created the problems (we are suffering under). This probably entails civil war.
Killing cockroaches is not sociopathy. ...Unless one is a cockroach.
I believe in owning the female.
I believe in disciplining the female.
I believe she is not equal intellectually or physically or morally (with anyone but the cockroaches).
None of the above is "sociopathy".
But conforming to feminist edicts and calling break-away from them 'sociopathy' is typical conservative conformist cowardice. This is exactly what liberalism time immemorial relies on to impose its snowballing revolution, generation after generation through all history.
Also your contention that [evil doers] will be put on a big bad "List" by the scary government is silly.
Big deal: I'm on a list now.
I like helicopters. The last ones were delicious.
You change a system by putting stress on it.
That takes courage.
Cowardice is for slaves.
-----------------
Laws are arbitrary ever changing constructs.
Eg this notion that young girls are off limits is a new law --created by men's enemies (the real sociopaths).
It needs to be changed.
Saying that is not sociopathy. But conforming to some law is cowardice. The very cowardice that is the root of feminism in the first place.
-----------------
The 'good pastor' is trying to stop feminism by attempting to evidence how it is bad for females.
"Equality is bad for females --they might pull a muscle!"
Good! I hope they do; their babymakers too. Yep.
I ain't give no fuck if female 'empowahment hurts females.
Even if paternalism/fem protectionism worked at stopping this phase of feminism, the situation created would be the perfect condition for feminism to start up again anew even more virulently.
===============
The problem is getting back there [an acceptable to 'me' cultural dynamic] and staying there forever. Note that we came from such a dynamic but snowballed out of it to this disaster.
The reason we snowballed out of that to the breed we've become now is the "alpha beta gamma" --coup d ta-- cycle of human (and proto human) history and pre history.
To thwart the coup d ta that destroys that cultural dynamic, all dudes need to be the same. Either through strict culling or bio tech making them the same.
=================
Why didn't telling the state to "go stuff it" work back when men were still in charge of the family and quasi self sufficient hunters and such?
Feminism happened because of cosmic determinism. Snowballs.
Understanding that allows us to --possibly-- make the current/snowball go where we want it to. And that would be determinism too.
---------
The state is not an enemy. This state is. This state came into being because men embraced the bizarre mentally ill fantasy that a world with out a state was/is possible.
+++++++++++++++++
=================
If there was any evidence that an actual company paid a wimmins less, Gloria Allred types would be all over it along with the media, and the Equal.O.C-type unconstitutional wimmins' government bureaus.
The 77 cents on the dollar means all men at large have generated more than all wimmins at large. But it is presented as though some chick at an interview was paid less than a man.
Not to mention the stat itself was debunked as a fem stat coming from some college dept that couldn't vindicate the stat itself. Just like with the DV and rape stats. Once challenged, there is no source for the stat but it grows legs and that becomes the stat. Note the 77 cents changes every year and depending on speech it could be as low as 75 to 70 cents; hell sometimes they'll be a decimal tail on it LOL.
When one actually studies the given thing that feminism complains about, he'll find that the females are actually advantaged in the given situation that the trumped up femstat complained about. Eg the military: only 25 % fem officers. Horrible! Until one considers that only 14% of military is female. Same with hospitals: more wimmins die in them you see ...cause men don't go there at all; and fewer wimmins used as _guinea pigs_ by new pharmaceuticals --the outrage!. Well it's the same with this money thing: the females are actually over advantaged by corporations and Human Resources than the men for less real work generated.
And none of that even begins to address the more important underlying and surrounding issue which is "fem sex value" and male competition over it. The only reason people work and have "positions" in the first place.
-----------
I believe Western culture needs to eliminate the bad blood/breeds that created the problems (we are suffering under). This probably entails civil war.
Killing cockroaches is not sociopathy. ...Unless one is a cockroach.
I believe in owning the female.
I believe in disciplining the female.
I believe she is not equal intellectually or physically or morally (with anyone but the cockroaches).
None of the above is "sociopathy".
But conforming to feminist edicts and calling break-away from them 'sociopathy' is typical conservative conformist cowardice. This is exactly what liberalism time immemorial relies on to impose its snowballing revolution, generation after generation through all history.
Also your contention that [evil doers] will be put on a big bad "List" by the scary government is silly.
Big deal: I'm on a list now.
I like helicopters. The last ones were delicious.
You change a system by putting stress on it.
That takes courage.
Cowardice is for slaves.
-----------------
Laws are arbitrary ever changing constructs.
Eg this notion that young girls are off limits is a new law --created by men's enemies (the real sociopaths).
It needs to be changed.
Saying that is not sociopathy. But conforming to some law is cowardice. The very cowardice that is the root of feminism in the first place.
-----------------
The 'good pastor' is trying to stop feminism by attempting to evidence how it is bad for females.
"Equality is bad for females --they might pull a muscle!"
Good! I hope they do; their babymakers too. Yep.
I ain't give no fuck if female 'empowahment hurts females.
Even if paternalism/fem protectionism worked at stopping this phase of feminism, the situation created would be the perfect condition for feminism to start up again anew even more virulently.
===============
The problem is getting back there [an acceptable to 'me' cultural dynamic] and staying there forever. Note that we came from such a dynamic but snowballed out of it to this disaster.
The reason we snowballed out of that to the breed we've become now is the "alpha beta gamma" --coup d ta-- cycle of human (and proto human) history and pre history.
To thwart the coup d ta that destroys that cultural dynamic, all dudes need to be the same. Either through strict culling or bio tech making them the same.
=================
Why didn't telling the state to "go stuff it" work back when men were still in charge of the family and quasi self sufficient hunters and such?
Feminism happened because of cosmic determinism. Snowballs.
Understanding that allows us to --possibly-- make the current/snowball go where we want it to. And that would be determinism too.
---------
The state is not an enemy. This state is. This state came into being because men embraced the bizarre mentally ill fantasy that a world with out a state was/is possible.
+++++++++++++++++
=================
If there was any evidence that an actual company paid a wimmins less, Gloria Allred types would be all over it along with the media, and the Equal.O.C-type unconstitutional wimmins' government bureaus.
The 77 cents on the dollar means all men at large have generated more than all wimmins at large. But it is presented as though some chick at an interview was paid less than a man.
Not to mention the stat itself was debunked as a fem stat coming from some college dept that couldn't vindicate the stat itself. Just like with the DV and rape stats. Once challenged, there is no source for the stat but it grows legs and that becomes the stat. Note the 77 cents changes every year and depending on speech it could be as low as 75 to 70 cents; hell sometimes they'll be a decimal tail on it LOL.
When one actually studies the given thing that feminism complains about, he'll find that the females are actually advantaged in the given situation that the trumped up femstat complained about. Eg the military: only 25 % fem officers. Horrible! Until one considers that only 14% of military is female. Same with hospitals: more wimmins die in them you see ...cause men don't go there at all; and fewer wimmins used as _guinea pigs_ by new pharmaceuticals --the outrage!. Well it's the same with this money thing: the females are actually over advantaged by corporations and Human Resources than the men for less real work generated.
And none of that even begins to address the more important underlying and surrounding issue which is "fem sex value" and male competition over it. The only reason people work and have "positions" in the first place.
Friday, October 23, 2009
Finale, Solutions
Finale, Solutions
(Just a sketch)
Stopping fem is two fold.
How to stop the system we have now and what system to create that prevents these problems in the future. By solving the 2nd problem first, it gives us the rally cry means to solve the first one, since the masses don't jump out of the frying pan until they know there is something other than fire beyond.
2) How to prevent fem forever. Preventing fem forever entails understanding how fem happened...
We keep alive too many weak males for the last few centuries/millenia. Feminism is a trick the runt males use to box out the better males. This emboldens females.
-----
I advocate and recommend stopping pro fem breed and belief --in all of its manifestations and prerequisite-antecedents-- for all times and always-- through _any_means_ necessary.
Note that there is no such thing as equal: Equal is rally cry (and solution attempt) of battles passed; it is long since exposed as balder dash.
BS --like “hope” and the rest of the altruism largess apparatus-- is ultimately simply tactical on the part of the speaker since the utopia espoused can't happen but replacing others with _your_ greed & need can.
I understand freedom is a bloody word. Most people don't have the stomach for it. At _best_ they can fight every once and a while to try to free themselves from some acute enslavement. But they don't have the courage or brains/foresight to see the larger causes that lead to each liberation revolution always falling short. Therefore they don't have the whatever to nip the problems in the bud. Non the less long term solution are needed --a big picture rassion d tre.
All the talk about protecting inferiors and all. That's what unraveled the west originally.
================
Solving The Human Condition Woes:
.Testing and sterilization of the stupid and cruel (start by testing before voting);
.Make everyone the same in childhood (but 'up' rather than 'down' sameness) --since most politics is unwitting reactionarism /venting from kidhood;
._Control of female hypergamy instinct_ through any means. (Men shouldn't be squeamish here; men "anthropomorphize" females more than they deserve.)
=======================
The anglo colonial idea (america et al) of running away to the hinterland as a way of getting away from the hive and its blabbering hypocrisy is a dead end. That hinterland solution has been said all along before; It is the exploration age and colonial ethos. It didn’t work the first time.
...Gamble that civi self destructs through all the worker bees it forces into John Galt status.
How many more generations, runaway, can last un ‘absorbed’ in the outback? _Especially relevant question, since all --pertinently the females-- know how to use a phone now._
I think the fight is in the cities etc. Control of media and military [catch 22 there].
Convince soldiers, mano e mano, that they fight for the wrong side --ie their enemies-- as duped Useful Idiots; seize media; convince the rest. Note, soldiers are very thick though; La Machine likes it that way (Natural Selection doing its thing, selecting for conformist simple minded warrior drones).
Then once victory achieved, a strong _government_ created so as to prevent the problems of liberalism from ever rearing up again. (Ie get that whole “government is a bad word” thing out of your skulls; and you don’t need a “tax break” either, you dupes.)
If man makes it to an ‘undiscovered continent’ (eg space platforms), then varying social models will spring again, including MicroCommunities.
Once there, I’d recommend for the MicroCommunities A) being very isolated; and B) grappling with, so far un analyzed, gender (ie the females), child rearing and rank and caste issues among the male monkeys. Be aware that controlling gender and status issues --ie creating contentment-- will stifle “growth"/change. ...Thus allowing the more vibrant and hungry effete hives to find and absorb the MicroComms --unless MicroC are well out of reach. Natural Selection will do its thing.
=======================
The only long term solution to stopping the endless cycle of coup d eta which unraveled mankind is one-male-per-territory land owners; every male gets a plot and owned female(s). Think contented gorillas as opposed to revolutionary chimps. Use techno (genetic etc) to make everyone the same (and females compliant).
Space travel gives us raisson d tre rally point (something to do, rather than ‘invading slavia’ again or etc). And it creates room and another go/turn to try the scheme.
But first "Protectionism".
Abolish capitalism as a way of opposing liberalism, since they are more symbiotic than kidney failure and dialysis. Capitalism and democracy = doom, just like the jesus thing wound up equaling.
Once power is garnered (through protectionist BigTent triangulations), replace military, media, lawyers and academics too.
Then policy... Policies of eugenics and antifeminism; and space colonization. (Eugenics and anti fem achieved through soapbox economic protectionism.)
Long term...
Control breeding and rearing:
Male only land owners; one son only, who then passes baton to his one son on his own part of the large land plot, cyclically (two corners of a plot, back and forth over the generations). (Immortality techno might obsolete that.) Trespass is mortal crime; zero sexual mobility for females (ankle monitoring, etc possibly). Use Interwebs to link all male landowners who can remain individuals yet be plugged into, as neurons, a giant brain collective. Ie. Civilization yet still rural --'Ideal Mankind' [Himmler, Jefferson... and Mendelssohn too]. Teach the generations over same network.
Spread to orbit then beyond.
Out of the trees and off our knees.
Out of the larval cocoon.
(...But you are naughty children who will do it your own way. Enter our history as femdom Borg... who bring us to the same celestial destiny anyway.)
=================
1)How to stop it acutely/how to topple this regime? (People will say "hey that's a terrorist threat". No, it is a terrorist promise...)
Some media control then military coup then instantaneous media/law and elite putsches. More consciousness-raising first; Need better challenges to fem boiler plate [DV and stuff].
The fact females are ineffective in combat is a plus not a minus. We want america-- and the rest of the anglo-jew controlled west-- to start losing its wars.
....
Let's end lying to, emotionally abusing* and manipulating men. (*including but not limited to secret telling and gossip)
Let's end mothers abusing their children. (And I ain't talking about abortion.)
Let's end lesbian partner violence.
....
====================
>
“What do you propose for a solution [to single fem parent]? Forced marriage / re-marriage of single parents?”
>
Um...
1 Preventing them [wimmins] from breeding (through reversible sterilization) until claimed by passable adult male [see below 3b] then preventing them from divorcing?
2 Take away lone female social and economic "rights". ('Rights' is a made up term by con artists; those such as yourself. I don't actually acknowledge the term.)
3 Testing and sterilization before hand.
3b Elimination of under males/ replacing them with work machines (or 3c getting rid of 'low' males and then letting civilization die in favor of... "the matriarchy of the tribal past" LOL). [FYI, We do not come from matriarchies; indeed the whole concept of patriarchy and matriarchy is ever shift-able just so tale.]
4 Replacing of females with artificial womb technology (including conscripting other mammals [headless] (though I personally like animals too much), until full artificial wombs can be fabricated). [We could conscript altered human females so, actually.]
4b "Medicating or treating"(surgically) female humans to be more compliant "citizens".
Just a few solutions off the top of my head. Shall I go on?...
Oh BTW, jesus saves and when do I get my tax break?
I mean that's what it's all about right? Your type says whatever kind of protectionist utopian BS you want --literally ignoring your betters who have thought "utopia" all through already-- and then the the half brained, dog on leash Useful-Idiot 'conservatives' respond "tax break" or "but what about the lord?" Then every once and while your class lets them off the leash to go bite your enemies.
=============
If you’re concerned about race issues, form up with the Russians. It should’ve gone down like that in the mid 20th cent --instead of that disaster. Note the Slavs are a little meaner/more masculine than the Brits, though.
=============
As for race and feminism...
females need to be massively disenfranchised. Permanently.
Then internal human reproduction needs to be replaced with ‘external womb incubators’. (Not simply to allow abortion to be more easily outlawed (death to jebus cult).) External wombs will allow _consistently controlled_, _always pre-planned human procreation_ to occur. Also cloning techno and genetic health and disease techno needs to be mastered.
Either liberalism --which is a female trend-- will be nullified and therefore race replacement will stop. OR “race replacement” will occur and then the Euro-sphere females will get what they have coming.
...A new chimera breed will form from the enslaved loins of the remaining Euro females.
Either way the human female will be segregated from political life.
A grand cosmic irony befitting the make-believe Great Savant in the Sky.
As the wind laughs…
====================================
Eugenics
Smart people self sterilize all the time. It’s called thinking it through. The dumb can’t think it through so they should be forced to make the right decision (the decision to breed slowly and carefully).
Pain and suffering will be the norm in a race of idiots. Even if it is not ‘thought’ about.
Remember, either way “genics” happens. It is just a question of which strains will thrive --and whether these strains will be called “Eu-” or "Dys-”. (Note 'eu' or 'dys' are relative constructs.)
It gets even more complicated than that unfortunately; eg “heredity” etc. But the premise is super sound.
Meaning... er um... dog breeds [b]do[/b] form through selecting of characters from the litter BUT it isn't always a `straight line, given the 'profundities' of 'he's got grandma's nose and great grandpa's ears'.
(Few of those 'profundities' --from the 19th and 20th century explosion of epiphanies-- have trickled down and been imbibed properly because of the [i]political problems[/i]--problems in part created by the propaganda crusade to rally dopey johnny and his holy babble].)
But the premise of selective breeding always happening _whether we "take the bull by the horns" or not_ is super sound. [`T'is.]
And this 'taking the bull by the horns' is not synonymous with 'invading Slavia and engaging in "Draconian anti saboteur policy" [as retreating in dire straights occurs]; nor is it synonymous with inviting sanctimonious, hypocritical carpet bombing.
Most don't characterize eugenics any where near correct. ...Strawmen wherein the word 'eugenics' means German late war (WWII) slaughter --allied induced or scorched earth Goeterdaammerung.
If the dumb whites ascending in recent centuries are not sterilized, the “race” will die through the weight of their ill thinking majority muscle anyway.
This isn’t that complicated either.
============
Anti eugenicists would do better to say "techno can make everybody fit into a 'good stock' template without the sterilizing of 'undesirables' [since the [gene/medical] tech will eliminate the undesirables `at the gate through its advances]."
Yeah well so long as the stupid and the frontmen profiteer shysters (which the polite call lawmakers etc and capitalists etc) are in charge (not to mention the jew/media) chances of the gene/medical techno snowball being used for "good" are slim.
Like most things that have gripped white maledom, it's a catch 22... If we could only get rid of the giant peter-principle [mediocres failing upwards] structure of Lilliput, we'd be in a perfect position to... get rid of the giant peter-principle structure of Lilliput.
Also, allowing other types --_who have grievances with the intelligent, healthy white male host_-- to be "upgraded" to "our" aptitude is potentially shortsightedly dangerous.
Nurture is very real. And it's still all biodeterminism, since it's all bio chemistry. A petry dish doesn't recognize nature nurture sophistry.
To understand nature nurture, look at allergies. Two [b]different[/b] types walk through a hay field; one gets the sniffles and the other doesn't. It is genetics. Now take that one that does get the sniffles... If he never comes across hay, he will never get the sniffles. It is nurture/environment. (Hay is just an analog here--it can apply to lotsa scenarios.)
Also "lead in the water" changes someone's nervous system and therefore creates different end results. "Lead" is just one example of how monogenerational contingency effects bio-chemistry of individual.
Liberals take these facts and use them unscrupulously and hypocritically (just like the fact of right /wrong, and good /bad being relative constructs). Often jews, yes.
(By the way, regarding testing and eugenics, females are the 'carriers' of most social disease; the sons who are patho/ violent, bums, the weird etc are the expression of that disease. 'Female sexual value' --or more properly the instinct it has unwittingly bred for in ever competing males-- causes many/most to not see that.)
There is no ‘gene’ for things per se. “Gene” is a glib way of stating a premise.
There ARE differences in the tissues and etc bio chemistry between individuals; there are differences in perception, problem solving and prediction ability between individuals; the biochemistries are the roots of the different perception, problem solving and prediction abilities.
Genes turn food("energy") into those tissues and biochemistries. Genes express differently depending on which genes they have wound up near on the genome.
Environmental effects --acting like sideswipes / blind-sidings" on the food converting processes-- just further complexify the premise.
_________________________________________
====================================
Free Range pussy and 'Pick Up Artist' "Game" Culture
Females should be regulated. Free range pussy is as ridiculous as cattle randomly walking down the street.
Once men figured out how to domesticate food (a'la Steve Martin's caveman bit on SNL), the whole world radically changed.
We need such a revolution when it comes to these ill mannered, self centered discriminatory children (er um "females" I believe is the polite term) that the neo cortex must use for reproduction.
Down with 'free range pussy' setting terms for everyone. Regulate the female.
_"Down with Free Range pussy."_
Until then...
'Game' simply means, girls (like all people) are automatonic: when a stick is thrown they WILL CHASE IT.
The Christians and the liberals hate this, for it exposes their polite fictions which hold together this caste structure of runts as absurdity. Game pisses off all the right people and that's good.
It is very similar to the girl culture of gossip and legion 'wimmins magazines', where in females share tips about how to exploit men's most vulnerable needs for fun and profit.
That is why female et al outrage over 'game' is so... typical (hypocrisy). It is similar to the hypocritical outrage over "rock star and groupie culture": ...An arrogant-peacock man having rockstar leverage over people who are gaga needy and using them for fun is heinous, heinous, heinous and not very nice... unless you're an average or better (and talentless) teenage
girl doing it to her suitors and then it is a solemn right...
'Game' is "science"/Darwinism/anthropology/sociology/"socio-biology/evolutionary psychology/"HBD"** put into living practice --ignoring, _conspicuously,_ the sophistry based debates(looped in circles) that demand those subjects remain relegated to just theoretica.
You my dear are the object.
Fetch.
(_"science"/Darwinism/anthropology/sociology/"socio-biology/evolutionary psychology/"HBD"**_ **The reason the subject keeps changing its title is because the 'human sciences' are scary and controversial. The demagogues who ostensibly represent/parasite off of the scared masses come in with swords drawn to make the facts go away (and control the 'ceiling painting' implications of them). Ultimately the badly outnumbered intellects "abandon the field" to the sophists and protectionist demagogues. These intellects then set up shop somewhere else under a different name... until the "liberals" catch on and deploy their attack again...)
=============
For now porno is necessary to free males from the male and female created female sex-cartel.
But in the long run the boys are being exploited by pimps of various types (females or otherwise). That is the reason that AFTER the "revolution" porno will be controlled. _But NOT in the name of protecting females._
If and when the boys and men have access to sex when they want, porno won't be desired anymore for that reason.
==========
Others are right when they say "80% of dames doing 20% of dudes". This is the key thing. And yes it is the core of all 'inequality', discrimination, competition, health, caste and oppression. It is Not easy to solve though --especially when our society is born and bred full of dunces who can't begin to contemplate on that philosophical plane for genetic reasons. (That's why I say death to democracy.)
______________________________________________________________
=======================================================
Little Bo Pee Pee...
As the male human becomes more and more infantile (which is the side effect of men's coup d eta snowball of pulling down the dominant males and the primitive /robust way of life in general [which is the cause of "feminism"]), he is going to have to find a way to either stunt the females under his level of infantilism/sappiness or simply get rid of/purge the highest /most masculine/ most "self aware" females (who use to be kept in line by the long ousted dominant males).
If he doesn't, the praying mantis/black widow male-redundancy principle will trigger. Note that ubiquitous though conspicuously ignored "femdom" is that snowball getting rolling.
He can achieve this stunting of the females through... Promethean bio tech solutions or complicated biology shapings /personality shapings that come from complicated not understood socialization phenom (simply "nurture syndromes").
People don't get this stuff because the ascendant males of the runt-ocracy western man breeds for simply lack something important.
I challenge this notion that seeing a dick squirt a few years early "damages" a female. She is a _female_ for christ sake! --she's supposed to be "damaged" in that way. (If males can't accept that then 1 they can cut their dicks off (basically the modern agenda) and 2 not make any female children.)
Boys raised in single fem households --even if their is no sex involved-- are way, way more dysfunctional –unable to grow and “fledge” [like birds from a nest] “throw down” etc (self discipline, ambition/indolence etc)-- than a female who did 'it' with uncle.
Boinking/marrying a niece (and disciplining her too!) use to be totally normal for most until a few generations ago (it still is for much of the species). Stunting them – or the more popular way of saying it now "abusing their forming libidos" and “DV”-- is what makes a female stay female bio deterministically: if she keeps growing shes hits a type of maleness (or at least leverage).
Males don't want other males having easy access to sex so they look for any excuse to hamstring other males; they also display protector /mule abilities to females.
...Men discover a female who has been boinked young and then tell her she is "harmed" in some way as they get the blanky out and hot cocoa for her and tuck her feeties in (making a victim in the process) –calling out loudly a drag-net for the “offender” with finger in air and hand to their breast. And other older females will tell her she is damaged too, motivated by their understanding that she probably “lost” the “whose in charge” “eye contact” part of the encounter and motivated by their desire to use any trick/propaganda to get more deference from men (especially if they are wall flowers with axes to grind).
Note females specialize in “stare down” as toddlers, along with lifting their skirts when introduced to new older males and later walking on tip toes and sleeping with butts in the air. I don't know what that's supposed to mean... I'm just saying.
The boinked females “lost the [pyscho-babble] part of the encounter”. But that's just it-- we want them to “lose” this encounter. That's what undermines their sex cartel. Duh.
--------
On a related note, society invents elaborate canards that strippers and sex workers in general (eg porno) have so called “low body image” --said to be the side effect of uncle-etc boinking. LO freaking L: ...girls show their clams for a living with smirks on their faces to sailors for 2000 dollars a week because they are ashamed of their bodies [sarc]. Yeah, makes total sense. Egads!
I'll explain Sex workers (not junky street walker variety who are legally retarded)... They matured early (in modern america that is a synonym for Italian or other ethnic) and had the “pretty ones”[genitals] at the 11 year old all girl sleep-over pool-party (where girls explore same sex finger banging and the like). Ie they are the girls with _higher_ body image. Duh.
Then our simpering infantile society (jebus cult mixed with liberalism) --thru that simperingness _which emboldens_-- creates avenues for them with the lure of easy money and bad-ass status allure. (Probably false easy money lure: the market is swamped.)
------
Speaking of young gulls and the modern world...
Do 12 year old girls now shave their twats to look more grown up?...
================
How does having sex with the young female harm her?
All the females under 18 or 15 or even 13 who were married off in history were "harmed"?
Whatever harm you believe she incurs, others incur even worse harm in other categories without any sex involved yet society considers those other things "moral"/ not-harmful.
You don't think things through. You only see two domino effects of a 10 domino chain.
It's like Domestic Violence. If society doesn't allow the cheating wife to be "harmed", someone else will be by her untethered folly.
How does letting her escape the "harm" of feminine stunting not harm other people?
You're just making it up. Again, you don't think things through. You only see two domino effects of a 10 domino chain.
BTW, regarding Mylie Cyrus: Desire for Mylie Cyrus is not "pedo", being as she's a teen star. (She is a later blooming sappier redneck-type though. But thats good: we want to keep them there. Duh)
NOTE –and I never do this caps thing-- CONSERVATIVES –LIKE THE MASSES IN GENERAL--ARE DUNCES AND MINDLESSLY CONFORMIST AUTOMATONS AND GULLIBLE MULES WHO COULDN'T GET THEIR WAY OUT OF A WET PAPER BAG.
Tough guy white knights[tm] demonstrate that they believe in violence to make people obey.
So then it is just a question of WHAT people should obey.
For now the simpleminded types have embraced a total lie that the female humans are benign and good, when in truth she is the key to everyone's woe everywhere in all times.
Controlling her is key to all permanent solutions.
I wouldn’t come to the aid of any big mouth female ever.
That is one way to stop them.
So long as dunces –er uh I mean conservative men– continue to _mindlessly_, _instinctively_ defend females, the females will continue to snowball society down the path of more and more liberalism. Ie continue to damage people and society through tantrum.
The females are not sentient enough to understand or care that they are doing that. Like animals they –like most– only understand consequence in real time not potential. Ergo… let them go.
Another type of male is "Princess Spoilers"; they too are a core reason why we have feminism. ...Give the pathological squeaky wheel more and more oil ('or garsh, she'll scree'), while those with fewer mattress between themselves and the pea are told to "suck it up".
If you build bias into the system a minority of the malicious will use it unscrupulously.
=====================
Rape is a made up word. Especially in the Islam or Mormon instance of young female marriage.
This so called Islamic/Mormon “rape” really means not allowing females to charge a price; not allowing them to form a sex cartel; not allowing them to manipulate "Useful Idiot" infantile males into enslaving themselves.
The Mainstream West brainwashes it children to conform to its mores the same as those people "brainwash" theirs.
The Mainstream West has simply conformed to mores --often created by jews-- that trick it into thinking females are "equal" and should be "liberated".
You all --mainstream westerners-- then brainwash your children to those mores: you set up your male children to be "raped" by a system that not only doesn't have their best interests at heart but often outwardly despises them.
================
>
someone said, negatively: “sexual availability at puberty”
>>
Why shouldn’t wimmin be made to remain sexually available?
Men putting endless barriers around females (as their male reproductive strategy for marginalizing other males) is why we have the ambition, greed, political problems (triangulation: immigration, feminism etc) and the psychological /pathology problems, the chaotic economic/ ‘growth’ and environmental problems that we do in western culture.
Islamics and Polynesians and etc indolent cultures are non growth based --ie non environmentally destructive and non chaotic/ non pathologic-- specifically because the males are content…
…given the “sexual availability” of their females.
It is ironic that the west’s sexual revolution and “free love” led to the price of sex going through the roof (thereby exacerbating male competition to generate more for themselves --at others' expense-- so they can buy some acceptance and fidelity from a creature so en-pedestaled that she isn't use to offering any.
I find it fascinating that liberals have no problem advocating “redistribution of wealth” but are blind to the real wealth that biologically underpins and motivates all the other kinds of competition/ wealth acquiring.
Redistribute the real wealth!…
_Control the females_.
Liberals have always been bad at finding the point and that’s why they do so badly at the color in the circle with the number two pencil tests (hence they attack those tests as “arbitrary constructs” of some dark force called patriarchy).
People in western culture are like children that don’t understand what they really advocate. It’s just tantrum and endless political triangulations/ realignments venting failure issues from childhood.
=======================
Females are not equal.
Females need to be mute and stunted; or replaced.
Testing before voting.
Sterilize the dumb.
Abort the dopey (bio chemically diagnosed as such by future tech).
Christianity and democracy must be stopped.
Then Eugenics --ie testing in childhood and sterilization-- must be imposed. (Test(s) should look for intellect, health and sanity. Medical technology can be used to make one better prepared to 'pass' the test(s).)
If not the neo-cortex becomes extinct.
Simple.
===========
Never run.. It makes you look weak, thus leading to more, next time. Fighting back --and even losing-- is better. ...And then a nice speech/statement back at the mic, carpe diem style "[see what we mean? The 'injustice', etc.]".
============
I'm against sperm banks and adoption for anyone no less single fem parents. Children need to be raised by creatures that sense their aptitudes and characters.
.....................................................
Bombe, bombe, bombe per svegliare questi dormiglioni
“Bombs, bombs, bombs to wake up these sluggards"
+++++++++++++
Liberalism is not bad per se (all that vegetarianism and sappy this and sappy that). It is simply wrong: it makes bad decisions rooted in bad beliefs (most of that the fault of congenital shortcomings and complex snowballing implications of that). (Note I personally still pine for the northern “heroic” past (true conservationism), ‘cause I’m a child ‘alpha male’--the past is where I thrived --but it doesn’t ‘work’ or it would have already.)
+++++++++++++
===============
Males need to solve the man vs man problem --that starts in childhood-- that has plagued us time immemorial. Doing that will solve every other issue.
Competitivness _and_ genetic based difference (environmental difference just adds to that problem).
But more to the point "loss".
All politics is the side effect of reactionaryism from childhood.
The plug itself needs to be pulled that leads to the complexities that led to 'feminism'. Ie that led to civilization/jebus gobbly gook(wishful thinking)/democracy/feminism (and anti male marxism [which is jew motivated trick to marginalize host culture males]).
The alpha beta gamma coup d eta cycle has to be stopped itself.
We have the technologies and philosophical understandings now to begin to grapple with this.
One male per territory land owners; owned females --no leaving of land; one son only.
It is either the above or snowballing to femdom borg hive.
Think gorilla-ocray [one adult male per group] replacing chimp ocracy [many males in hierarchy with constant coup d eta].
(Snowballing collateral damage of gorilla-ocracy is trend towards dopey-laziness. Snowballing collaterol damage of chimp trend is democracy/feminism.)
Your choice...
-----------
The long term preventative solution is everybody needs to be made the same (through bio tech or severe heavy duty nurture controls) or we need thick culls each generation in childhood (so as to protect the good seed /children from the coalitions of envious vengeful idiots and weaklings).
How to get to that solution there is more difficult.
---------
I say --paraphrasing the Steve Martin caveman bit from old SNL --'down with free range pussy'.
If that winds up creating dysgenics where too many fool males breed, then we need eugenics to redress that.
We shouldn't just hope that after female liberation and dispersal that the 'best males' will by picked at the 'thumpa thumpa' club.
(Just a sketch)
Stopping fem is two fold.
How to stop the system we have now and what system to create that prevents these problems in the future. By solving the 2nd problem first, it gives us the rally cry means to solve the first one, since the masses don't jump out of the frying pan until they know there is something other than fire beyond.
2) How to prevent fem forever. Preventing fem forever entails understanding how fem happened...
We keep alive too many weak males for the last few centuries/millenia. Feminism is a trick the runt males use to box out the better males. This emboldens females.
-----
I advocate and recommend stopping pro fem breed and belief --in all of its manifestations and prerequisite-antecedents-- for all times and always-- through _any_means_ necessary.
Note that there is no such thing as equal: Equal is rally cry (and solution attempt) of battles passed; it is long since exposed as balder dash.
BS --like “hope” and the rest of the altruism largess apparatus-- is ultimately simply tactical on the part of the speaker since the utopia espoused can't happen but replacing others with _your_ greed & need can.
I understand freedom is a bloody word. Most people don't have the stomach for it. At _best_ they can fight every once and a while to try to free themselves from some acute enslavement. But they don't have the courage or brains/foresight to see the larger causes that lead to each liberation revolution always falling short. Therefore they don't have the whatever to nip the problems in the bud. Non the less long term solution are needed --a big picture rassion d tre.
All the talk about protecting inferiors and all. That's what unraveled the west originally.
================
Solving The Human Condition Woes:
.Testing and sterilization of the stupid and cruel (start by testing before voting);
.Make everyone the same in childhood (but 'up' rather than 'down' sameness) --since most politics is unwitting reactionarism /venting from kidhood;
._Control of female hypergamy instinct_ through any means. (Men shouldn't be squeamish here; men "anthropomorphize" females more than they deserve.)
=======================
The anglo colonial idea (america et al) of running away to the hinterland as a way of getting away from the hive and its blabbering hypocrisy is a dead end. That hinterland solution has been said all along before; It is the exploration age and colonial ethos. It didn’t work the first time.
...Gamble that civi self destructs through all the worker bees it forces into John Galt status.
How many more generations, runaway, can last un ‘absorbed’ in the outback? _Especially relevant question, since all --pertinently the females-- know how to use a phone now._
I think the fight is in the cities etc. Control of media and military [catch 22 there].
Convince soldiers, mano e mano, that they fight for the wrong side --ie their enemies-- as duped Useful Idiots; seize media; convince the rest. Note, soldiers are very thick though; La Machine likes it that way (Natural Selection doing its thing, selecting for conformist simple minded warrior drones).
Then once victory achieved, a strong _government_ created so as to prevent the problems of liberalism from ever rearing up again. (Ie get that whole “government is a bad word” thing out of your skulls; and you don’t need a “tax break” either, you dupes.)
If man makes it to an ‘undiscovered continent’ (eg space platforms), then varying social models will spring again, including MicroCommunities.
Once there, I’d recommend for the MicroCommunities A) being very isolated; and B) grappling with, so far un analyzed, gender (ie the females), child rearing and rank and caste issues among the male monkeys. Be aware that controlling gender and status issues --ie creating contentment-- will stifle “growth"/change. ...Thus allowing the more vibrant and hungry effete hives to find and absorb the MicroComms --unless MicroC are well out of reach. Natural Selection will do its thing.
=======================
The only long term solution to stopping the endless cycle of coup d eta which unraveled mankind is one-male-per-territory land owners; every male gets a plot and owned female(s). Think contented gorillas as opposed to revolutionary chimps. Use techno (genetic etc) to make everyone the same (and females compliant).
Space travel gives us raisson d tre rally point (something to do, rather than ‘invading slavia’ again or etc). And it creates room and another go/turn to try the scheme.
But first "Protectionism".
Abolish capitalism as a way of opposing liberalism, since they are more symbiotic than kidney failure and dialysis. Capitalism and democracy = doom, just like the jesus thing wound up equaling.
Once power is garnered (through protectionist BigTent triangulations), replace military, media, lawyers and academics too.
Then policy... Policies of eugenics and antifeminism; and space colonization. (Eugenics and anti fem achieved through soapbox economic protectionism.)
Long term...
Control breeding and rearing:
Male only land owners; one son only, who then passes baton to his one son on his own part of the large land plot, cyclically (two corners of a plot, back and forth over the generations). (Immortality techno might obsolete that.) Trespass is mortal crime; zero sexual mobility for females (ankle monitoring, etc possibly). Use Interwebs to link all male landowners who can remain individuals yet be plugged into, as neurons, a giant brain collective. Ie. Civilization yet still rural --'Ideal Mankind' [Himmler, Jefferson... and Mendelssohn too]. Teach the generations over same network.
Spread to orbit then beyond.
Out of the trees and off our knees.
Out of the larval cocoon.
(...But you are naughty children who will do it your own way. Enter our history as femdom Borg... who bring us to the same celestial destiny anyway.)
=================
1)How to stop it acutely/how to topple this regime? (People will say "hey that's a terrorist threat". No, it is a terrorist promise...)
Some media control then military coup then instantaneous media/law and elite putsches. More consciousness-raising first; Need better challenges to fem boiler plate [DV and stuff].
The fact females are ineffective in combat is a plus not a minus. We want america-- and the rest of the anglo-jew controlled west-- to start losing its wars.
....
Let's end lying to, emotionally abusing* and manipulating men. (*including but not limited to secret telling and gossip)
Let's end mothers abusing their children. (And I ain't talking about abortion.)
Let's end lesbian partner violence.
....
====================
>
“What do you propose for a solution [to single fem parent]? Forced marriage / re-marriage of single parents?”
>
Um...
1 Preventing them [wimmins] from breeding (through reversible sterilization) until claimed by passable adult male [see below 3b] then preventing them from divorcing?
2 Take away lone female social and economic "rights". ('Rights' is a made up term by con artists; those such as yourself. I don't actually acknowledge the term.)
3 Testing and sterilization before hand.
3b Elimination of under males/ replacing them with work machines (or 3c getting rid of 'low' males and then letting civilization die in favor of... "the matriarchy of the tribal past" LOL). [FYI, We do not come from matriarchies; indeed the whole concept of patriarchy and matriarchy is ever shift-able just so tale.]
4 Replacing of females with artificial womb technology (including conscripting other mammals [headless] (though I personally like animals too much), until full artificial wombs can be fabricated). [We could conscript altered human females so, actually.]
4b "Medicating or treating"(surgically) female humans to be more compliant "citizens".
Just a few solutions off the top of my head. Shall I go on?...
Oh BTW, jesus saves and when do I get my tax break?
I mean that's what it's all about right? Your type says whatever kind of protectionist utopian BS you want --literally ignoring your betters who have thought "utopia" all through already-- and then the the half brained, dog on leash Useful-Idiot 'conservatives' respond "tax break" or "but what about the lord?" Then every once and while your class lets them off the leash to go bite your enemies.
=============
If you’re concerned about race issues, form up with the Russians. It should’ve gone down like that in the mid 20th cent --instead of that disaster. Note the Slavs are a little meaner/more masculine than the Brits, though.
=============
As for race and feminism...
females need to be massively disenfranchised. Permanently.
Then internal human reproduction needs to be replaced with ‘external womb incubators’. (Not simply to allow abortion to be more easily outlawed (death to jebus cult).) External wombs will allow _consistently controlled_, _always pre-planned human procreation_ to occur. Also cloning techno and genetic health and disease techno needs to be mastered.
Either liberalism --which is a female trend-- will be nullified and therefore race replacement will stop. OR “race replacement” will occur and then the Euro-sphere females will get what they have coming.
...A new chimera breed will form from the enslaved loins of the remaining Euro females.
Either way the human female will be segregated from political life.
A grand cosmic irony befitting the make-believe Great Savant in the Sky.
As the wind laughs…
====================================
Eugenics
Smart people self sterilize all the time. It’s called thinking it through. The dumb can’t think it through so they should be forced to make the right decision (the decision to breed slowly and carefully).
Pain and suffering will be the norm in a race of idiots. Even if it is not ‘thought’ about.
Remember, either way “genics” happens. It is just a question of which strains will thrive --and whether these strains will be called “Eu-” or "Dys-”. (Note 'eu' or 'dys' are relative constructs.)
It gets even more complicated than that unfortunately; eg “heredity” etc. But the premise is super sound.
Meaning... er um... dog breeds [b]do[/b] form through selecting of characters from the litter BUT it isn't always a `straight line, given the 'profundities' of 'he's got grandma's nose and great grandpa's ears'.
(Few of those 'profundities' --from the 19th and 20th century explosion of epiphanies-- have trickled down and been imbibed properly because of the [i]political problems[/i]--problems in part created by the propaganda crusade to rally dopey johnny and his holy babble].)
But the premise of selective breeding always happening _whether we "take the bull by the horns" or not_ is super sound. [`T'is.]
And this 'taking the bull by the horns' is not synonymous with 'invading Slavia and engaging in "Draconian anti saboteur policy" [as retreating in dire straights occurs]; nor is it synonymous with inviting sanctimonious, hypocritical carpet bombing.
Most don't characterize eugenics any where near correct. ...Strawmen wherein the word 'eugenics' means German late war (WWII) slaughter --allied induced or scorched earth Goeterdaammerung.
If the dumb whites ascending in recent centuries are not sterilized, the “race” will die through the weight of their ill thinking majority muscle anyway.
This isn’t that complicated either.
============
Anti eugenicists would do better to say "techno can make everybody fit into a 'good stock' template without the sterilizing of 'undesirables' [since the [gene/medical] tech will eliminate the undesirables `at the gate through its advances]."
Yeah well so long as the stupid and the frontmen profiteer shysters (which the polite call lawmakers etc and capitalists etc) are in charge (not to mention the jew/media) chances of the gene/medical techno snowball being used for "good" are slim.
Like most things that have gripped white maledom, it's a catch 22... If we could only get rid of the giant peter-principle [mediocres failing upwards] structure of Lilliput, we'd be in a perfect position to... get rid of the giant peter-principle structure of Lilliput.
Also, allowing other types --_who have grievances with the intelligent, healthy white male host_-- to be "upgraded" to "our" aptitude is potentially shortsightedly dangerous.
Nurture is very real. And it's still all biodeterminism, since it's all bio chemistry. A petry dish doesn't recognize nature nurture sophistry.
To understand nature nurture, look at allergies. Two [b]different[/b] types walk through a hay field; one gets the sniffles and the other doesn't. It is genetics. Now take that one that does get the sniffles... If he never comes across hay, he will never get the sniffles. It is nurture/environment. (Hay is just an analog here--it can apply to lotsa scenarios.)
Also "lead in the water" changes someone's nervous system and therefore creates different end results. "Lead" is just one example of how monogenerational contingency effects bio-chemistry of individual.
Liberals take these facts and use them unscrupulously and hypocritically (just like the fact of right /wrong, and good /bad being relative constructs). Often jews, yes.
(By the way, regarding testing and eugenics, females are the 'carriers' of most social disease; the sons who are patho/ violent, bums, the weird etc are the expression of that disease. 'Female sexual value' --or more properly the instinct it has unwittingly bred for in ever competing males-- causes many/most to not see that.)
There is no ‘gene’ for things per se. “Gene” is a glib way of stating a premise.
There ARE differences in the tissues and etc bio chemistry between individuals; there are differences in perception, problem solving and prediction ability between individuals; the biochemistries are the roots of the different perception, problem solving and prediction abilities.
Genes turn food("energy") into those tissues and biochemistries. Genes express differently depending on which genes they have wound up near on the genome.
Environmental effects --acting like sideswipes / blind-sidings" on the food converting processes-- just further complexify the premise.
_________________________________________
====================================
Free Range pussy and 'Pick Up Artist' "Game" Culture
Females should be regulated. Free range pussy is as ridiculous as cattle randomly walking down the street.
Once men figured out how to domesticate food (a'la Steve Martin's caveman bit on SNL), the whole world radically changed.
We need such a revolution when it comes to these ill mannered, self centered discriminatory children (er um "females" I believe is the polite term) that the neo cortex must use for reproduction.
Down with 'free range pussy' setting terms for everyone. Regulate the female.
_"Down with Free Range pussy."_
Until then...
'Game' simply means, girls (like all people) are automatonic: when a stick is thrown they WILL CHASE IT.
The Christians and the liberals hate this, for it exposes their polite fictions which hold together this caste structure of runts as absurdity. Game pisses off all the right people and that's good.
It is very similar to the girl culture of gossip and legion 'wimmins magazines', where in females share tips about how to exploit men's most vulnerable needs for fun and profit.
That is why female et al outrage over 'game' is so... typical (hypocrisy). It is similar to the hypocritical outrage over "rock star and groupie culture": ...An arrogant-peacock man having rockstar leverage over people who are gaga needy and using them for fun is heinous, heinous, heinous and not very nice... unless you're an average or better (and talentless) teenage
girl doing it to her suitors and then it is a solemn right...
'Game' is "science"/Darwinism/anthropology/sociology/"socio-biology/evolutionary psychology/"HBD"** put into living practice --ignoring, _conspicuously,_ the sophistry based debates(looped in circles) that demand those subjects remain relegated to just theoretica.
You my dear are the object.
Fetch.
(_"science"/Darwinism/anthropology/sociology/"socio-biology/evolutionary psychology/"HBD"**_ **The reason the subject keeps changing its title is because the 'human sciences' are scary and controversial. The demagogues who ostensibly represent/parasite off of the scared masses come in with swords drawn to make the facts go away (and control the 'ceiling painting' implications of them). Ultimately the badly outnumbered intellects "abandon the field" to the sophists and protectionist demagogues. These intellects then set up shop somewhere else under a different name... until the "liberals" catch on and deploy their attack again...)
=============
For now porno is necessary to free males from the male and female created female sex-cartel.
But in the long run the boys are being exploited by pimps of various types (females or otherwise). That is the reason that AFTER the "revolution" porno will be controlled. _But NOT in the name of protecting females._
If and when the boys and men have access to sex when they want, porno won't be desired anymore for that reason.
==========
Others are right when they say "80% of dames doing 20% of dudes". This is the key thing. And yes it is the core of all 'inequality', discrimination, competition, health, caste and oppression. It is Not easy to solve though --especially when our society is born and bred full of dunces who can't begin to contemplate on that philosophical plane for genetic reasons. (That's why I say death to democracy.)
______________________________________________________________
=======================================================
Little Bo Pee Pee...
As the male human becomes more and more infantile (which is the side effect of men's coup d eta snowball of pulling down the dominant males and the primitive /robust way of life in general [which is the cause of "feminism"]), he is going to have to find a way to either stunt the females under his level of infantilism/sappiness or simply get rid of/purge the highest /most masculine/ most "self aware" females (who use to be kept in line by the long ousted dominant males).
If he doesn't, the praying mantis/black widow male-redundancy principle will trigger. Note that ubiquitous though conspicuously ignored "femdom" is that snowball getting rolling.
He can achieve this stunting of the females through... Promethean bio tech solutions or complicated biology shapings /personality shapings that come from complicated not understood socialization phenom (simply "nurture syndromes").
People don't get this stuff because the ascendant males of the runt-ocracy western man breeds for simply lack something important.
I challenge this notion that seeing a dick squirt a few years early "damages" a female. She is a _female_ for christ sake! --she's supposed to be "damaged" in that way. (If males can't accept that then 1 they can cut their dicks off (basically the modern agenda) and 2 not make any female children.)
Boys raised in single fem households --even if their is no sex involved-- are way, way more dysfunctional –unable to grow and “fledge” [like birds from a nest] “throw down” etc (self discipline, ambition/indolence etc)-- than a female who did 'it' with uncle.
Boinking/marrying a niece (and disciplining her too!) use to be totally normal for most until a few generations ago (it still is for much of the species). Stunting them – or the more popular way of saying it now "abusing their forming libidos" and “DV”-- is what makes a female stay female bio deterministically: if she keeps growing shes hits a type of maleness (or at least leverage).
Males don't want other males having easy access to sex so they look for any excuse to hamstring other males; they also display protector /mule abilities to females.
...Men discover a female who has been boinked young and then tell her she is "harmed" in some way as they get the blanky out and hot cocoa for her and tuck her feeties in (making a victim in the process) –calling out loudly a drag-net for the “offender” with finger in air and hand to their breast. And other older females will tell her she is damaged too, motivated by their understanding that she probably “lost” the “whose in charge” “eye contact” part of the encounter and motivated by their desire to use any trick/propaganda to get more deference from men (especially if they are wall flowers with axes to grind).
Note females specialize in “stare down” as toddlers, along with lifting their skirts when introduced to new older males and later walking on tip toes and sleeping with butts in the air. I don't know what that's supposed to mean... I'm just saying.
The boinked females “lost the [pyscho-babble] part of the encounter”. But that's just it-- we want them to “lose” this encounter. That's what undermines their sex cartel. Duh.
--------
On a related note, society invents elaborate canards that strippers and sex workers in general (eg porno) have so called “low body image” --said to be the side effect of uncle-etc boinking. LO freaking L: ...girls show their clams for a living with smirks on their faces to sailors for 2000 dollars a week because they are ashamed of their bodies [sarc]. Yeah, makes total sense. Egads!
I'll explain Sex workers (not junky street walker variety who are legally retarded)... They matured early (in modern america that is a synonym for Italian or other ethnic) and had the “pretty ones”[genitals] at the 11 year old all girl sleep-over pool-party (where girls explore same sex finger banging and the like). Ie they are the girls with _higher_ body image. Duh.
Then our simpering infantile society (jebus cult mixed with liberalism) --thru that simperingness _which emboldens_-- creates avenues for them with the lure of easy money and bad-ass status allure. (Probably false easy money lure: the market is swamped.)
------
Speaking of young gulls and the modern world...
Do 12 year old girls now shave their twats to look more grown up?...
================
How does having sex with the young female harm her?
All the females under 18 or 15 or even 13 who were married off in history were "harmed"?
Whatever harm you believe she incurs, others incur even worse harm in other categories without any sex involved yet society considers those other things "moral"/ not-harmful.
You don't think things through. You only see two domino effects of a 10 domino chain.
It's like Domestic Violence. If society doesn't allow the cheating wife to be "harmed", someone else will be by her untethered folly.
How does letting her escape the "harm" of feminine stunting not harm other people?
You're just making it up. Again, you don't think things through. You only see two domino effects of a 10 domino chain.
BTW, regarding Mylie Cyrus: Desire for Mylie Cyrus is not "pedo", being as she's a teen star. (She is a later blooming sappier redneck-type though. But thats good: we want to keep them there. Duh)
NOTE –and I never do this caps thing-- CONSERVATIVES –LIKE THE MASSES IN GENERAL--ARE DUNCES AND MINDLESSLY CONFORMIST AUTOMATONS AND GULLIBLE MULES WHO COULDN'T GET THEIR WAY OUT OF A WET PAPER BAG.
Tough guy white knights[tm] demonstrate that they believe in violence to make people obey.
So then it is just a question of WHAT people should obey.
For now the simpleminded types have embraced a total lie that the female humans are benign and good, when in truth she is the key to everyone's woe everywhere in all times.
Controlling her is key to all permanent solutions.
I wouldn’t come to the aid of any big mouth female ever.
That is one way to stop them.
So long as dunces –er uh I mean conservative men– continue to _mindlessly_, _instinctively_ defend females, the females will continue to snowball society down the path of more and more liberalism. Ie continue to damage people and society through tantrum.
The females are not sentient enough to understand or care that they are doing that. Like animals they –like most– only understand consequence in real time not potential. Ergo… let them go.
Another type of male is "Princess Spoilers"; they too are a core reason why we have feminism. ...Give the pathological squeaky wheel more and more oil ('or garsh, she'll scree'), while those with fewer mattress between themselves and the pea are told to "suck it up".
If you build bias into the system a minority of the malicious will use it unscrupulously.
=====================
Rape is a made up word. Especially in the Islam or Mormon instance of young female marriage.
This so called Islamic/Mormon “rape” really means not allowing females to charge a price; not allowing them to form a sex cartel; not allowing them to manipulate "Useful Idiot" infantile males into enslaving themselves.
The Mainstream West brainwashes it children to conform to its mores the same as those people "brainwash" theirs.
The Mainstream West has simply conformed to mores --often created by jews-- that trick it into thinking females are "equal" and should be "liberated".
You all --mainstream westerners-- then brainwash your children to those mores: you set up your male children to be "raped" by a system that not only doesn't have their best interests at heart but often outwardly despises them.
================
>
someone said, negatively: “sexual availability at puberty”
>>
Why shouldn’t wimmin be made to remain sexually available?
Men putting endless barriers around females (as their male reproductive strategy for marginalizing other males) is why we have the ambition, greed, political problems (triangulation: immigration, feminism etc) and the psychological /pathology problems, the chaotic economic/ ‘growth’ and environmental problems that we do in western culture.
Islamics and Polynesians and etc indolent cultures are non growth based --ie non environmentally destructive and non chaotic/ non pathologic-- specifically because the males are content…
…given the “sexual availability” of their females.
It is ironic that the west’s sexual revolution and “free love” led to the price of sex going through the roof (thereby exacerbating male competition to generate more for themselves --at others' expense-- so they can buy some acceptance and fidelity from a creature so en-pedestaled that she isn't use to offering any.
I find it fascinating that liberals have no problem advocating “redistribution of wealth” but are blind to the real wealth that biologically underpins and motivates all the other kinds of competition/ wealth acquiring.
Redistribute the real wealth!…
_Control the females_.
Liberals have always been bad at finding the point and that’s why they do so badly at the color in the circle with the number two pencil tests (hence they attack those tests as “arbitrary constructs” of some dark force called patriarchy).
People in western culture are like children that don’t understand what they really advocate. It’s just tantrum and endless political triangulations/ realignments venting failure issues from childhood.
=======================
Females are not equal.
Females need to be mute and stunted; or replaced.
Testing before voting.
Sterilize the dumb.
Abort the dopey (bio chemically diagnosed as such by future tech).
Christianity and democracy must be stopped.
Then Eugenics --ie testing in childhood and sterilization-- must be imposed. (Test(s) should look for intellect, health and sanity. Medical technology can be used to make one better prepared to 'pass' the test(s).)
If not the neo-cortex becomes extinct.
Simple.
===========
Never run.. It makes you look weak, thus leading to more, next time. Fighting back --and even losing-- is better. ...And then a nice speech/statement back at the mic, carpe diem style "[see what we mean? The 'injustice', etc.]".
============
I'm against sperm banks and adoption for anyone no less single fem parents. Children need to be raised by creatures that sense their aptitudes and characters.
.....................................................
Bombe, bombe, bombe per svegliare questi dormiglioni
“Bombs, bombs, bombs to wake up these sluggards"
+++++++++++++
Liberalism is not bad per se (all that vegetarianism and sappy this and sappy that). It is simply wrong: it makes bad decisions rooted in bad beliefs (most of that the fault of congenital shortcomings and complex snowballing implications of that). (Note I personally still pine for the northern “heroic” past (true conservationism), ‘cause I’m a child ‘alpha male’--the past is where I thrived --but it doesn’t ‘work’ or it would have already.)
+++++++++++++
===============
Males need to solve the man vs man problem --that starts in childhood-- that has plagued us time immemorial. Doing that will solve every other issue.
Competitivness _and_ genetic based difference (environmental difference just adds to that problem).
But more to the point "loss".
All politics is the side effect of reactionaryism from childhood.
The plug itself needs to be pulled that leads to the complexities that led to 'feminism'. Ie that led to civilization/jebus gobbly gook(wishful thinking)/democracy/feminism (and anti male marxism [which is jew motivated trick to marginalize host culture males]).
The alpha beta gamma coup d eta cycle has to be stopped itself.
We have the technologies and philosophical understandings now to begin to grapple with this.
One male per territory land owners; owned females --no leaving of land; one son only.
It is either the above or snowballing to femdom borg hive.
Think gorilla-ocray [one adult male per group] replacing chimp ocracy [many males in hierarchy with constant coup d eta].
(Snowballing collateral damage of gorilla-ocracy is trend towards dopey-laziness. Snowballing collaterol damage of chimp trend is democracy/feminism.)
Your choice...
-----------
The long term preventative solution is everybody needs to be made the same (through bio tech or severe heavy duty nurture controls) or we need thick culls each generation in childhood (so as to protect the good seed /children from the coalitions of envious vengeful idiots and weaklings).
How to get to that solution there is more difficult.
---------
I say --paraphrasing the Steve Martin caveman bit from old SNL --'down with free range pussy'.
If that winds up creating dysgenics where too many fool males breed, then we need eugenics to redress that.
We shouldn't just hope that after female liberation and dispersal that the 'best males' will by picked at the 'thumpa thumpa' club.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
