Thursday, September 2, 2010
Solutions
I walk the line, for you... bab-bee.
A thousand miles..., for you.
[I think I'm all out of fair use there.]
____________________________
=========================
SOLUTIONS
A basic principle is amoral determinism. [Indifference and cause and effect.] All that law and constitution and all that jazz is just bullshit for the small minded and con artists.
===========
Men defining themselves as dogs for women's sleds... It is important that men break away from that mind set. It is that mind set that under girded, allowed and promoted feminism originally (mixed with jewish occupational explotive political triangulations with the fems against the the host culture males). It is what under girds it now.
===============
You want to stop liberal stuff?
Okay then you have to stop american "freedom" horseshit first. All that capitalism nonsense and that christ absurdity and the romanticizing the founders and all that republican hooey needs to be dead.
Then liberalism dies that instant.
The reason liberal hypocrisy thrives is because that which is embraced as oppositional to liberalism is actually the pillar structure of liberalism. Always has been. But apparently people are too brain dead to get that. Very curious.
=========
The conservatives are good dumb-beast sacrifices that will help us get dems and liberals (where thought [sometimes grand] and policy comes from) over to our side.
At the very least, why would any thinking --or yes even feeling-- man want to tie himself to that anchor [that is head in hole conservatism and easily demonizable greed]?
==============
How much do you have invested in this system? Male conformity/honor-duty compulsion is all. The system itself is to blame, not any one policy or administration.
============
Liberals should note that there is no reason to liberate female dalliance tendency and their stupidty just to lessen the breeding of idiots. Note population as a whole has increased during female emancipation; just like rampant sexual objectification (of both genders) has. Also other deemed wrongs that were supposed to be solved by liberalism have.
Why can't we control population growth and keep females from cheating (and etc stuff) too?
Same for jebus cult: why is the only way to stop female leverage deemed none self aware kiss-it-up-to-god-ism?
Shooting people in the face would reduce birth rates too. Or as Monty Python said "having your balls removed" would too. So would a lot of things.
=============
If you want to create a good breed you have to cull for it.
But because jebus culture is such a _disaster of moronic thumb sucking gits, no one gets that_.
============
There should be only female intel field operatives. Same with only female cops and firemen and helicopter pilots and the like. Oh and only female aircraft carrier commanders.
Death to democracy.
==============
I say bio tech to make everyone the same. And a protectionist plank platform in order to win power enough to get there. Note that "Individualism"/colonialism/entrepreneurial ism/ etc' will never win power against protectionism; ever. Never has and never will. (And humans are inherently in protectionist bands; they are called tribes/troops.) There are various profound reasons for why individualism/capitalism becomes part of a _false dichotomy two party system_ and for why 'we' pretend that it is oppositional to the culture it carries but it has never held sway in any of the approx one HUNDRED countries it has been advocated in even once.
=============
Someone needs to make a kennedy-like speech about getting the next great task done. (I'm not addressing whether or not kennedy is good or a fraud. I mean the galvanizing speech towards big aim.) Instead of the moon launch or bombing 3rd world anti fem it needs to be about genome research and etc bio tech and starting to solve the human condition for everyone.
It is good and important that male studies is trying to get off the ground; I'm not confident though--either its ability or sincerity/honesty. Men's perspective is key, key, crucially needed in solving these woes; It needs to necessarily contradict and CO -OPT the female rap. (Garner sympathy from but at the same time assert how bad that garnering is, given the tendency females have towards discriminatory blood thirsty (true) shit test game playing, where they hate male weakness like males hate female back hair.)
=============
IQ 120s are the oligarchy of modern society; the middle men.
Using the horde of hapless 110s and 100s (and the crude and probably supra vicious 90s) --rallied up through protectionism--to get rid of the oligarchy of liars and con artist who have taken over in the last few centuries (the true beta males of the previous species we come from) would end "liberalism" where it lives.
You don't understand because you --ALL OF YOU-- don't get the alpha beta gamma thing I started. It is not about one's studliness at the thumpa thumpa club (steady girls). It is about the general caste structure of this species as lensed through our understanding of primates. Our species is in a caste structure of IQ 130-145s then IQ 115s to 130s an then IQ 100ish at the bottom. The middle class (115s -130) there has used protectionist demagoguery so as to rally the 100s against the the 137ish thus turning our world upside down.
The jew migrants --ie the "marxist"-- were relevent, in that they were the main 120 something protectionist demagogues --the recent beta along with the upper irish-- who ousted the order of the previous 19th century era. ...And now academia is "marxist", with the "darwinists" all since fired. You types don't know that stuff because it all happened over your heads for class reasons; meaning you aint got none.
So when I say "get rid of the 120s" I mean get rid of the modern western oligarchy --the pretenders to the thrones of authority. The "beta" (whether or not they "pull" cunt at the club); whether they have good jobs and game or not.
Also there is no way to get rid of the majority outright (90-110 makes up about 65 % of the culture!): the majority must be used (ie rallied through protectionism) to oust the ruling class (of 120ish sophist conspirator demagogues who ousted the darwinists who were and are smarter).
Then Transhumanism will happen. Tough titties. There is no way to get around the fact that christianity --especially protestant nuttery--is doomed (and has been for centuries) no matter whether marxism or darwinism prevails here. These cult nutjobs HIDING in the stycks that we call america might try to keep their heads up their asses but it isn't impressing anyone. It has however prevented the "darwinists" from keeping the snowballing liberal zeitgeist coup (regardless of "party") out of power.
=============
Fem says: "The desire to lower the age of consent is so they can mold the knave to their liking."
What's wrong with molding the girl?
People are molded from knaves all the time. It is what school is for. It is what TV is for. It is what the family is for. And it is what the modern single fem family does.
What specifically is the problem with molding young girls to be more submissive to, loyal to and respectful towards men?
How does one stop feminism without such a program?
===============
...The arbitrary unfairness of ignoring lovers of the same age when one is more manipulatively self aware and vengeful then the other. The laws about consent are ostensibly there to protect the naive from the wolf; but it is more often than not that the naive is a teen boy being played* by his cheating girl (who is often a few years younger than him --by her choice).
(*"played" = emotionally abused pretty severly actually. We just don't accept this as truth while at the same time telling the boys to suck it up.)
===============
Are you 'morally' prepared to kill off the men and females who create feminism?
Are you prepared to create state/church/institutionally mandated tariffs to keep the pro fem type of [nature/nurture created] male and female from forming again?
=======================
It is fine to learn, girl.
But then... your penance is to dissuade other men out there of their whiteknighting tendencies by making them understand that wimmin are not pristine, faultless fallen angels (in what ever category-of-the-day is being discussed); that females have an assortment of instincts and thus can be very cruel, deceptive, manipulative, non self aware, childish and downright abusive in many categories.
Then go ye forth and sin no more.
===========
The fathers should have trump card say.
It is all part the american anti authority thing that compels us otherwise. We won't be young forever, you know: we become fathers eventually.
If we take power away from the ho and power away from the father, who is left? The 19 year old's penis --and the mawms [adult wimmins]. Sounds similar to what we have now.
============
"Human rights" is --just like equality and ALL OF THE OTHER RIGHTS BLABBER --just made up nonsense created by the runt moralists so as to get rid of the better males from childhood.
=============
Many simply need to be dead _for being the wrong package of modules (compulsions)_ (like getting rid of dog strains from the litter that are not desired, so as to create a better breed). That isn't happening because of capitalist democracy and chrisendumb.
=============
Testing and sterilizing those below say IQ 120 solves most problems.
Eugenics now!
Protectionism to achieve power. Political theartah (symbols and such) so as to rally the conformist horde/ military muscle. Then impose your policies --Testing and sterilization of the dolts. (This isn't rocket science.)
=================
Early on the females should have been banned from our "thought space" rather than given their own space and having men's space be communal.
=======
INFIDELITY
The knowing party(ies) should be accountable for infidelity only. A dupe trying to get laid didn't do anything wrong or disrespectful to the jilted boyfriend/husband.
The males who can't grasp that --the ones who need to vent on the nearest male-- need to be _culled out_.
===========
RE: STONING
If you infantilize society you stand the chance of liberating females(who are repulsed by and prone to dominate infantiles).
The females will then cheat rampantly "legally". Then "80 percent of the females will be doing 20 percent of the dudes." Females will be self entitled, oblivious to and unreachable about this and the boys will still do the work and be told to just shut up and go along.
That is the quandry that arises when stopping the old ways.
------------
And the commentators are confused over what to do to stop stoning.
You breed for new modules as far as getting rid of the sadists.
You'll still need to cull for cheaters too then.
For both cullings, use lethal injection to eliminate. Or personality controlling chemicals to change.
============
--------------------
============
There is no such thing as a world without "social Darwinism".
There is such a thing however as self awareness or ignorance. The "anti Darwinists" would have us all be ignorant of how things actually work.
================
[Question by someone:] "Is there a balance between shutting women in their homes and giving them license to wreck society and trample on the lives of those around them?"
No, there is none. Dimorphic sexuality is emasculation(thus creating creating females); And then consequenting female hyper value.
Dem's the facts. (Censored, convoluted-up, tortured and just plain squashed as they are.)
[Question by someone:] "I suspect that this will be one of the most difficult questions to answer, and we may have to put a great deal of effort into working it out."
The destiny is quite simple:
The under health males kept alive by human material success will continue to triangulate with females as their way of getting rid of the healthier males from childhood. Once that is achieved (as it has been in the west for all intents and purposes) the new 'social sexual dynamic' (ie "mating ritual" or mating dance /display) created between the runt males and the "liberated" females (liberated by the elimination of the healthy who previously kept the females in line /emasculated) will be a male immolation dynamic of one stripe or another as payment to fem sex value (ala praying mantis like or etc).
One way or another, males will pay to fem sex value: either males will kill each other off in battles created by fem sex value and then the winner males (his wide-lens libido) will pick and emasculate [ie "rape" or "child molest" if you will] females (thus creating females in the process, for more softwired organisms, eg mollusks or etc); or the males will protect themselves from those culling battles by giving the power of choice to the females --who will then "eat" (take energy from, in one way or another) the winner males.
Eventually if the neo cortex survives (which might be doubtful, since females and runts don't really have it) gender itself will be eliminated in favor of hermaphrodites or Asexual clones.
And even without any of that, Mankind or "humanity" will voluntarily replace itself --numbers wise--with machines. (Meaning silicon and iron and such rather than the types of machines that organisms are already.) The reason it will be "voluntarily" (rather than a robot coup, ala Hollywood) is those machines will make much better progeny (tools of war --the 'spearheads' of the multi generational lances-- against the other lineages) than the biologic types we rely on now to pull it all off and carry it all on.
All of that has been going on since before Rome but really ramped up after Rome's fall and the jesus cult diaspora. I know you all think I'm crazy or mean or such. But I'm simply smarter than you --I see more clearly than you : You all lack layers of cerebrum; meaning it's like you're color blind and the electromagnetic phenomenon called green simply can't trigger your "green receptor color cones"(molecules on the retina) which respond to the electromag contingency-- "green" -- `cause you ain't got green receptors.
Ie you is dumb.
===========
We need to convince civilization's mechanism (specialists) to try and make men equal at the biological level [enter the machine clone progeny?] --because men are the true victims of society (always have been --that's why men are as strong as they are) and redistribute the real wealth --_pu$$y_-- which is the core wealth that motivates all the other competition, "inequality" and disparity, pain and suffering between men.
Men are not fighting over money: they are fighting over pu$$y. Money is simply an abstract measuring stick for seeing who's next in line to get some.
So long as Free Range Pussy exists there will never be "equality" between men. Pu$$y would never stand for it!
But if we could get men the same and pussy in check, well...
It is like that Steve Martin caveman bit from the old Saturday Night Live. After the hunt he says, (and this is all paraphrase from memory) "listen instead of just eating the thing why don't we save it and catch another one tomorrow and then we can mate them and have a steady supply of food forever? This way we will have free-ed up energy that will allow us to do great things: build structures and invent and then develop profound philosophies that allow us to truly understand it all since we won't just be chasing these things[food] around all day every day."
The dumb thick and furrow browed chief looks at him and goes "you smart. We will sleep now and think more on this tomorrow."
The tribe all turns to go set up their sleeping spots.
Loraine Neuman is one of the cave bitches; absurdly thick browed. She stayed behind by Steve Martin CaveMan as the others were turning to leave and she goes to him "duh, um... you make me wet." [big laugh]
The dumb chief who had already turned to leave but was still in ear shot sees this and he is not happy.
Steve nods 'oh, thank you' or similar to Loraine cave bitch. They then-- Loraine and Steve-- turn to go with the others.
The tribe is asleep now. Steve Caveman is asleep at his spot.
The chief sneakily gets up from his spot and skulks over to where Steve is sleeping. He then proceeds to bash Steve CaveMan in the head with a rock until dead.
The chief then stands, pounds his chest and goes "And now I am smart".
And... scene!
-------------------------
Well if we could get FRP (free range pussy) in check, we wouldn't have to chase these things(Pu$$y) around all day. That would free up energy to... to do great things...
Like replace ourselves with machines.
Or just sit in a pile of filth and fuck our in-check nieces all day...
So there you go. Simple.
Good luck.
==============
"Equality for Men is not something that should ever be desired, any more than Equality between the sexes.
Both ideas are expressions of the same Liberal Revolt agaisnt Reality, and the same perverse mental illness."
Inequality between men is the reason they fight. That fight has LED INEVITABLY to LIBERALISM and FEMINISM.
To prevent that from happening --after 'we' win the war to stop lib and fem (as if)-- the root problem itself has to be solved.
You are simply a very primitive thinker. ...Reason number 6 thousand, 4 hundred and fifty 2 you should be in alliance with islam against the likes of me. But you can't get yourself out of the tangles that have confused you all.
==============
The so called rebelling minorities of the 60s were not white adult men trying to upset the pu$$y status quo of the elites. The "rebels" were the equivalent of the children, wives and pets of the ruling class. They got away with it and were given things for the same reason a crying baby or begging puppy does and is.
"This won't be won politically. A revolution is needed."
Correct.
Grand triangulations and realignments...
The N koreans; and chinese; islam; domestic black; and the latest ethnics.
Keep the GOP --the muscle and wallet of liberalism --out of power. The liberal big tent will then faction along internal fissures. The us --and britn (brit to US : Greece to Rome)-- will be unable to impose anywhere and will shrink and then implode hopefully under external pushes.
But that simply gets us --mankind-- back to zero. Next time the "problem" itself needs to be solved once and for all.
...Our understanding of determinism --Nature, Darwinism-- or whatever you want to call it-- allows us to get to the root of it all...
Female sexual value and 'Alpha beta gamma coup d eta' rooted in have and have not and loss. (I've explained it many times.)
======================
When fem says "77 cents on the dollar" I say back "the only reason men work at all is to balance out female sexual value."
That won't work at first BECAUSE THE ANGLO WORLD (AMERICA) IS DEEP DEEP DEEP WITH _THUMB SUCKING RETARD GITS_ ("MEN" and christians I believe are the polite terms). But if you keep at it --as I have for the last 15 years-- eventually you RETARDED THUMB SUCKING GITS catch on to how naturalism works.
Another: Libs scream how many wimmins aren't allowed abortions (which in an of itself is a lie); I say back that there aren't enough abortions yet.
Another... Feminists and git pyscho-babble masculinists say "females are hurt by 'social symbols' (eg Gilligan's Island's Maryanne in short-shorts causes females to be too dumb to go to NASA)." I say back males are far worse off than females[bullet list enters here which I don't do] and since we are to believe social signals have power to create 'nurture syndromes' inducing underachievement than we have to accept that there are hurtful to boys symbols coming from on high (which we have _obvious evidence for everywhere_ unlike the bald face lie that females are under siege from "patriarchal symbols") . And also females are just naturally dumb for genetic reasons; genes _selected_ by our tribal past. ([Followed up by: "I aint looking for votes and I don't believe in the democracy equality gibberish.")
Fems stats about violence and etc. I say "those are liberal protected groups (ethnics and poor) not the white patriarchy. And those stats are evidence for how democracy is bad --ie how men are NOT equal-- not evidence for how men are bad and wimmins (golden, no doubt [sarc]) deserve special one-up privileges." ("Not to mention liberal hypocrites stereotype men with a broad brush and then advocate unconstitutional discriminatory policy.") (Not that I would lower myself to even wiping my ass with the constitution and the like.)
And etc etc.
Basically just watch the way I've done it here (when I have energy to engage).
Tanks and planes blow open stuck trench warfare debates.
I don't know if it will work.
I do know that western Anglo Conservationism HAS NOT worked.
Testing and sterilization. (Or water posioning and etc.)
We have too many git males that used to die but now thrive.
That is why feminism INEVITABLY happened.
my "alpha beta gamma principle" tries to explain.
We have snowballed over the generations into a place (through AlphaBG coup cycles), where masculine behavior --which creates and controls fem behavior--is taboo/"criminal". It is that that is emboldening the females; ie that which is creating "feminism".
=============
Females are not intellectually and physically equal with males.
They are the key catalysts for competition (and the consequent stress, pain and suffering, and disparity).
They have childish manipulative, deceptive, two faced, secretive, discriminatory, complain-based* characters. (*cracking-the-whip technique.)
They are way over privileged under the law --and always have been.
Dim sex is an emasculation battle.
There is no such thing as equal or any of that modern cult talk.
None of that is "hatred."
As I tried to explain earlier, understanding yucky truth[tm] is not sociopathy; _creating solutions that accept the yucky truth as starting point is not sociopathy._
Well the same goes for pu$$y and this misogyny/hatred cry. Accurate interpretation of society, history, mating dance and female character and aptitude --and the history of dim sex itself-- is not "hatred". Likewise creating solutions that accept that yucky truth as starting point is not hatred.
(Or if you must, hatred has its roll: self defense. I "hate" it when a bear mauls me; I kind of hate the bear. Tying up a bear is not "hatred". (I don't actually believe in cruelty to animals. But that is not the point. The point is the animal is bad and needs to be tethered. It is not "hate" when the mauled attempt tethering.))
"Morality" demagoguery (eg denouncing people who see clearly as 'sociopaths' or 'haters') has always been the way nerds/monks have controlled and shaped society over to their liking.
Indeed psycho babble diagnosis --ie made up nonsense which is just pulled out of the ass-- is the way the latest runtdom/monkdom (called liberalism) controls society now.
===================
I believe we need more "sociopaths".
Sociopathy being an arbitrary construct...
Yes bio chemistries are recognizably different. But the definitions of "criminally insane" and sociopathy or anything like that are ARBITRARY. There is no such biological diagnosis. It is purely legalistic political funny business that by purposeful legalistic design ignores existential (surrounding issue) prerequisites.
Observe: I believe it is sociopathy to NOT abort. I believe the biochemistries that CAN'T see it that way ARE recognizably biologically different from "good people"; I deem these bio types criminally insane sociopaths. It is sociopathy to let idiots breed.
=================
We shouldn't forfeit the protectionism planks when they are the only ones that have ever won power in any system no less a system that has institutionalized demagogic protectionism.
=================
Why give the females a pass on the root discrimination that motivates all the competition and have and have-not in the world when the female movement doesn't allow the same discrimination against ugly chicks without making it a battle cry ["looks-ism" and "objectification"] and demanding change which specifically seeks to take away that male power to discriminate --even though males are already instinctually less discriminatory than the females in this very catagory of who fucks who?
Why give the female whole a pass when they do not reciprocate in kind? Indeed males ignoring the wall flowers is the original impetus for this wave of "la femme mystique" in the last 150 years we call feminism.
============
MESSAGE TO GIRLIES:
You have had sex with a man?
Meaning you get off on a man fucking you doggy style holding your hips and telling you he is going to cum ("so hold still you little creature") while you give a guttural moan into the pillow your face is in as he fills you?
If you don't want that, you understand that you are rare right? What are you going to do with all the people who do like it that way?
And if you do like it that way, saying well "that is just sex--I meant submit in social and political, legal type circles" is not good enough. The reason it is not good enough is most of your female libido is psychological. You get off on the whole scene not just the acute physical (this is wrong?). If the creature fucking you is not someone you respect (and I mean respect as a "better" an authority figure --not just some goofy word from a song) you won't be liking him enough or liking him using you like that.
And also (and this is important), if the male isn't prevented from being a creature who is better than you by the state, he naturally will be better often [except runts, which I want to ameliorate through tech]. But if the state is preventing men from being better, then it is making them submit.
So men will be submitting. Therefore your whole "nobody should submit to anyone" thing is empty, ill thought through nonsense. Especially ill thought through when one factors in that as the state prevents men from naturally displaying in ways that normal females desire, the female will start shunning them and/or moving in to treat them dominantly.
So how can females not submit to men in a system that doesn't coerce men into submission? How can wimmin be free from this submission to men without a state that makes men submit?
Again, your whole "nobody should submit to anyone" thing is empty and ill thought through.
...The female human is a non sentient child. That is my professional diagnosis. The stuff that comes out of her mouth just sounds like words, so as to trick men into providing for her expert parasitism (like a baby).
females are not broad minded, outside looking in thinkers. More like colicky babies on instinct. They will cry till the milk is gone or somebody plays deaf to them and lets them cry themselves out one time.
Do you really believe that female humans are intellectuality and physically "equal" with the best men? If not --ie if you do believe wimmin lack something some men have-- should the female submit to those men?
===========
I do know the 'devil is in the details'. ...Sitting right next to the females and the specialists.
A thousand miles..., for you.
[I think I'm all out of fair use there.]
____________________________
=========================
SOLUTIONS
A basic principle is amoral determinism. [Indifference and cause and effect.] All that law and constitution and all that jazz is just bullshit for the small minded and con artists.
===========
Men defining themselves as dogs for women's sleds... It is important that men break away from that mind set. It is that mind set that under girded, allowed and promoted feminism originally (mixed with jewish occupational explotive political triangulations with the fems against the the host culture males). It is what under girds it now.
===============
You want to stop liberal stuff?
Okay then you have to stop american "freedom" horseshit first. All that capitalism nonsense and that christ absurdity and the romanticizing the founders and all that republican hooey needs to be dead.
Then liberalism dies that instant.
The reason liberal hypocrisy thrives is because that which is embraced as oppositional to liberalism is actually the pillar structure of liberalism. Always has been. But apparently people are too brain dead to get that. Very curious.
=========
The conservatives are good dumb-beast sacrifices that will help us get dems and liberals (where thought [sometimes grand] and policy comes from) over to our side.
At the very least, why would any thinking --or yes even feeling-- man want to tie himself to that anchor [that is head in hole conservatism and easily demonizable greed]?
==============
How much do you have invested in this system? Male conformity/honor-duty compulsion is all. The system itself is to blame, not any one policy or administration.
============
Liberals should note that there is no reason to liberate female dalliance tendency and their stupidty just to lessen the breeding of idiots. Note population as a whole has increased during female emancipation; just like rampant sexual objectification (of both genders) has. Also other deemed wrongs that were supposed to be solved by liberalism have.
Why can't we control population growth and keep females from cheating (and etc stuff) too?
Same for jebus cult: why is the only way to stop female leverage deemed none self aware kiss-it-up-to-god-ism?
Shooting people in the face would reduce birth rates too. Or as Monty Python said "having your balls removed" would too. So would a lot of things.
=============
If you want to create a good breed you have to cull for it.
But because jebus culture is such a _disaster of moronic thumb sucking gits, no one gets that_.
============
There should be only female intel field operatives. Same with only female cops and firemen and helicopter pilots and the like. Oh and only female aircraft carrier commanders.
Death to democracy.
==============
I say bio tech to make everyone the same. And a protectionist plank platform in order to win power enough to get there. Note that "Individualism"/colonialism/entrepreneurial ism/ etc' will never win power against protectionism; ever. Never has and never will. (And humans are inherently in protectionist bands; they are called tribes/troops.) There are various profound reasons for why individualism/capitalism becomes part of a _false dichotomy two party system_ and for why 'we' pretend that it is oppositional to the culture it carries but it has never held sway in any of the approx one HUNDRED countries it has been advocated in even once.
=============
Someone needs to make a kennedy-like speech about getting the next great task done. (I'm not addressing whether or not kennedy is good or a fraud. I mean the galvanizing speech towards big aim.) Instead of the moon launch or bombing 3rd world anti fem it needs to be about genome research and etc bio tech and starting to solve the human condition for everyone.
It is good and important that male studies is trying to get off the ground; I'm not confident though--either its ability or sincerity/honesty. Men's perspective is key, key, crucially needed in solving these woes; It needs to necessarily contradict and CO -OPT the female rap. (Garner sympathy from but at the same time assert how bad that garnering is, given the tendency females have towards discriminatory blood thirsty (true) shit test game playing, where they hate male weakness like males hate female back hair.)
=============
IQ 120s are the oligarchy of modern society; the middle men.
Using the horde of hapless 110s and 100s (and the crude and probably supra vicious 90s) --rallied up through protectionism--to get rid of the oligarchy of liars and con artist who have taken over in the last few centuries (the true beta males of the previous species we come from) would end "liberalism" where it lives.
You don't understand because you --ALL OF YOU-- don't get the alpha beta gamma thing I started. It is not about one's studliness at the thumpa thumpa club (steady girls). It is about the general caste structure of this species as lensed through our understanding of primates. Our species is in a caste structure of IQ 130-145s then IQ 115s to 130s an then IQ 100ish at the bottom. The middle class (115s -130) there has used protectionist demagoguery so as to rally the 100s against the the 137ish thus turning our world upside down.
The jew migrants --ie the "marxist"-- were relevent, in that they were the main 120 something protectionist demagogues --the recent beta along with the upper irish-- who ousted the order of the previous 19th century era. ...And now academia is "marxist", with the "darwinists" all since fired. You types don't know that stuff because it all happened over your heads for class reasons; meaning you aint got none.
So when I say "get rid of the 120s" I mean get rid of the modern western oligarchy --the pretenders to the thrones of authority. The "beta" (whether or not they "pull" cunt at the club); whether they have good jobs and game or not.
Also there is no way to get rid of the majority outright (90-110 makes up about 65 % of the culture!): the majority must be used (ie rallied through protectionism) to oust the ruling class (of 120ish sophist conspirator demagogues who ousted the darwinists who were and are smarter).
Then Transhumanism will happen. Tough titties. There is no way to get around the fact that christianity --especially protestant nuttery--is doomed (and has been for centuries) no matter whether marxism or darwinism prevails here. These cult nutjobs HIDING in the stycks that we call america might try to keep their heads up their asses but it isn't impressing anyone. It has however prevented the "darwinists" from keeping the snowballing liberal zeitgeist coup (regardless of "party") out of power.
=============
Fem says: "The desire to lower the age of consent is so they can mold the knave to their liking."
What's wrong with molding the girl?
People are molded from knaves all the time. It is what school is for. It is what TV is for. It is what the family is for. And it is what the modern single fem family does.
What specifically is the problem with molding young girls to be more submissive to, loyal to and respectful towards men?
How does one stop feminism without such a program?
===============
...The arbitrary unfairness of ignoring lovers of the same age when one is more manipulatively self aware and vengeful then the other. The laws about consent are ostensibly there to protect the naive from the wolf; but it is more often than not that the naive is a teen boy being played* by his cheating girl (who is often a few years younger than him --by her choice).
(*"played" = emotionally abused pretty severly actually. We just don't accept this as truth while at the same time telling the boys to suck it up.)
===============
Are you 'morally' prepared to kill off the men and females who create feminism?
Are you prepared to create state/church/institutionally mandated tariffs to keep the pro fem type of [nature/nurture created] male and female from forming again?
=======================
It is fine to learn, girl.
But then... your penance is to dissuade other men out there of their whiteknighting tendencies by making them understand that wimmin are not pristine, faultless fallen angels (in what ever category-of-the-day is being discussed); that females have an assortment of instincts and thus can be very cruel, deceptive, manipulative, non self aware, childish and downright abusive in many categories.
Then go ye forth and sin no more.
===========
The fathers should have trump card say.
It is all part the american anti authority thing that compels us otherwise. We won't be young forever, you know: we become fathers eventually.
If we take power away from the ho and power away from the father, who is left? The 19 year old's penis --and the mawms [adult wimmins]. Sounds similar to what we have now.
============
"Human rights" is --just like equality and ALL OF THE OTHER RIGHTS BLABBER --just made up nonsense created by the runt moralists so as to get rid of the better males from childhood.
=============
Many simply need to be dead _for being the wrong package of modules (compulsions)_ (like getting rid of dog strains from the litter that are not desired, so as to create a better breed). That isn't happening because of capitalist democracy and chrisendumb.
=============
Testing and sterilizing those below say IQ 120 solves most problems.
Eugenics now!
Protectionism to achieve power. Political theartah (symbols and such) so as to rally the conformist horde/ military muscle. Then impose your policies --Testing and sterilization of the dolts. (This isn't rocket science.)
=================
Early on the females should have been banned from our "thought space" rather than given their own space and having men's space be communal.
=======
INFIDELITY
The knowing party(ies) should be accountable for infidelity only. A dupe trying to get laid didn't do anything wrong or disrespectful to the jilted boyfriend/husband.
The males who can't grasp that --the ones who need to vent on the nearest male-- need to be _culled out_.
===========
RE: STONING
If you infantilize society you stand the chance of liberating females(who are repulsed by and prone to dominate infantiles).
The females will then cheat rampantly "legally". Then "80 percent of the females will be doing 20 percent of the dudes." Females will be self entitled, oblivious to and unreachable about this and the boys will still do the work and be told to just shut up and go along.
That is the quandry that arises when stopping the old ways.
------------
And the commentators are confused over what to do to stop stoning.
You breed for new modules as far as getting rid of the sadists.
You'll still need to cull for cheaters too then.
For both cullings, use lethal injection to eliminate. Or personality controlling chemicals to change.
============
--------------------
============
There is no such thing as a world without "social Darwinism".
There is such a thing however as self awareness or ignorance. The "anti Darwinists" would have us all be ignorant of how things actually work.
================
[Question by someone:] "Is there a balance between shutting women in their homes and giving them license to wreck society and trample on the lives of those around them?"
No, there is none. Dimorphic sexuality is emasculation(thus creating creating females); And then consequenting female hyper value.
Dem's the facts. (Censored, convoluted-up, tortured and just plain squashed as they are.)
[Question by someone:] "I suspect that this will be one of the most difficult questions to answer, and we may have to put a great deal of effort into working it out."
The destiny is quite simple:
The under health males kept alive by human material success will continue to triangulate with females as their way of getting rid of the healthier males from childhood. Once that is achieved (as it has been in the west for all intents and purposes) the new 'social sexual dynamic' (ie "mating ritual" or mating dance /display) created between the runt males and the "liberated" females (liberated by the elimination of the healthy who previously kept the females in line /emasculated) will be a male immolation dynamic of one stripe or another as payment to fem sex value (ala praying mantis like or etc).
One way or another, males will pay to fem sex value: either males will kill each other off in battles created by fem sex value and then the winner males (his wide-lens libido) will pick and emasculate [ie "rape" or "child molest" if you will] females (thus creating females in the process, for more softwired organisms, eg mollusks or etc); or the males will protect themselves from those culling battles by giving the power of choice to the females --who will then "eat" (take energy from, in one way or another) the winner males.
Eventually if the neo cortex survives (which might be doubtful, since females and runts don't really have it) gender itself will be eliminated in favor of hermaphrodites or Asexual clones.
And even without any of that, Mankind or "humanity" will voluntarily replace itself --numbers wise--with machines. (Meaning silicon and iron and such rather than the types of machines that organisms are already.) The reason it will be "voluntarily" (rather than a robot coup, ala Hollywood) is those machines will make much better progeny (tools of war --the 'spearheads' of the multi generational lances-- against the other lineages) than the biologic types we rely on now to pull it all off and carry it all on.
All of that has been going on since before Rome but really ramped up after Rome's fall and the jesus cult diaspora. I know you all think I'm crazy or mean or such. But I'm simply smarter than you --I see more clearly than you : You all lack layers of cerebrum; meaning it's like you're color blind and the electromagnetic phenomenon called green simply can't trigger your "green receptor color cones"(molecules on the retina) which respond to the electromag contingency-- "green" -- `cause you ain't got green receptors.
Ie you is dumb.
===========
We need to convince civilization's mechanism (specialists) to try and make men equal at the biological level [enter the machine clone progeny?] --because men are the true victims of society (always have been --that's why men are as strong as they are) and redistribute the real wealth --_pu$$y_-- which is the core wealth that motivates all the other competition, "inequality" and disparity, pain and suffering between men.
Men are not fighting over money: they are fighting over pu$$y. Money is simply an abstract measuring stick for seeing who's next in line to get some.
So long as Free Range Pussy exists there will never be "equality" between men. Pu$$y would never stand for it!
But if we could get men the same and pussy in check, well...
It is like that Steve Martin caveman bit from the old Saturday Night Live. After the hunt he says, (and this is all paraphrase from memory) "listen instead of just eating the thing why don't we save it and catch another one tomorrow and then we can mate them and have a steady supply of food forever? This way we will have free-ed up energy that will allow us to do great things: build structures and invent and then develop profound philosophies that allow us to truly understand it all since we won't just be chasing these things[food] around all day every day."
The dumb thick and furrow browed chief looks at him and goes "you smart. We will sleep now and think more on this tomorrow."
The tribe all turns to go set up their sleeping spots.
Loraine Neuman is one of the cave bitches; absurdly thick browed. She stayed behind by Steve Martin CaveMan as the others were turning to leave and she goes to him "duh, um... you make me wet." [big laugh]
The dumb chief who had already turned to leave but was still in ear shot sees this and he is not happy.
Steve nods 'oh, thank you' or similar to Loraine cave bitch. They then-- Loraine and Steve-- turn to go with the others.
The tribe is asleep now. Steve Caveman is asleep at his spot.
The chief sneakily gets up from his spot and skulks over to where Steve is sleeping. He then proceeds to bash Steve CaveMan in the head with a rock until dead.
The chief then stands, pounds his chest and goes "And now I am smart".
And... scene!
-------------------------
Well if we could get FRP (free range pussy) in check, we wouldn't have to chase these things(Pu$$y) around all day. That would free up energy to... to do great things...
Like replace ourselves with machines.
Or just sit in a pile of filth and fuck our in-check nieces all day...
So there you go. Simple.
Good luck.
==============
"Equality for Men is not something that should ever be desired, any more than Equality between the sexes.
Both ideas are expressions of the same Liberal Revolt agaisnt Reality, and the same perverse mental illness."
Inequality between men is the reason they fight. That fight has LED INEVITABLY to LIBERALISM and FEMINISM.
To prevent that from happening --after 'we' win the war to stop lib and fem (as if)-- the root problem itself has to be solved.
You are simply a very primitive thinker. ...Reason number 6 thousand, 4 hundred and fifty 2 you should be in alliance with islam against the likes of me. But you can't get yourself out of the tangles that have confused you all.
==============
The so called rebelling minorities of the 60s were not white adult men trying to upset the pu$$y status quo of the elites. The "rebels" were the equivalent of the children, wives and pets of the ruling class. They got away with it and were given things for the same reason a crying baby or begging puppy does and is.
"This won't be won politically. A revolution is needed."
Correct.
Grand triangulations and realignments...
The N koreans; and chinese; islam; domestic black; and the latest ethnics.
Keep the GOP --the muscle and wallet of liberalism --out of power. The liberal big tent will then faction along internal fissures. The us --and britn (brit to US : Greece to Rome)-- will be unable to impose anywhere and will shrink and then implode hopefully under external pushes.
But that simply gets us --mankind-- back to zero. Next time the "problem" itself needs to be solved once and for all.
...Our understanding of determinism --Nature, Darwinism-- or whatever you want to call it-- allows us to get to the root of it all...
Female sexual value and 'Alpha beta gamma coup d eta' rooted in have and have not and loss. (I've explained it many times.)
======================
Can you give some examples on how shifting the reasoning would work?
When fem says "77 cents on the dollar" I say back "the only reason men work at all is to balance out female sexual value."
That won't work at first BECAUSE THE ANGLO WORLD (AMERICA) IS DEEP DEEP DEEP WITH _THUMB SUCKING RETARD GITS_ ("MEN" and christians I believe are the polite terms). But if you keep at it --as I have for the last 15 years-- eventually you RETARDED THUMB SUCKING GITS catch on to how naturalism works.
Another: Libs scream how many wimmins aren't allowed abortions (which in an of itself is a lie); I say back that there aren't enough abortions yet.
Another... Feminists and git pyscho-babble masculinists say "females are hurt by 'social symbols' (eg Gilligan's Island's Maryanne in short-shorts causes females to be too dumb to go to NASA)." I say back males are far worse off than females[bullet list enters here which I don't do] and since we are to believe social signals have power to create 'nurture syndromes' inducing underachievement than we have to accept that there are hurtful to boys symbols coming from on high (which we have _obvious evidence for everywhere_ unlike the bald face lie that females are under siege from "patriarchal symbols") . And also females are just naturally dumb for genetic reasons; genes _selected_ by our tribal past. ([Followed up by: "I aint looking for votes and I don't believe in the democracy equality gibberish.")
Fems stats about violence and etc. I say "those are liberal protected groups (ethnics and poor) not the white patriarchy. And those stats are evidence for how democracy is bad --ie how men are NOT equal-- not evidence for how men are bad and wimmins (golden, no doubt [sarc]) deserve special one-up privileges." ("Not to mention liberal hypocrites stereotype men with a broad brush and then advocate unconstitutional discriminatory policy.") (Not that I would lower myself to even wiping my ass with the constitution and the like.)
And etc etc.
Basically just watch the way I've done it here (when I have energy to engage).
Tanks and planes blow open stuck trench warfare debates.
I don't know if it will work.
I do know that western Anglo Conservationism HAS NOT worked.
Testing and sterilization. (Or water posioning and etc.)
We have too many git males that used to die but now thrive.
That is why feminism INEVITABLY happened.
my "alpha beta gamma principle" tries to explain.
We have snowballed over the generations into a place (through AlphaBG coup cycles), where masculine behavior --which creates and controls fem behavior--is taboo/"criminal". It is that that is emboldening the females; ie that which is creating "feminism".
=============
Females are not intellectually and physically equal with males.
They are the key catalysts for competition (and the consequent stress, pain and suffering, and disparity).
They have childish manipulative, deceptive, two faced, secretive, discriminatory, complain-based* characters. (*cracking-the-whip technique.)
They are way over privileged under the law --and always have been.
Dim sex is an emasculation battle.
There is no such thing as equal or any of that modern cult talk.
None of that is "hatred."
As I tried to explain earlier, understanding yucky truth[tm] is not sociopathy; _creating solutions that accept the yucky truth as starting point is not sociopathy._
Well the same goes for pu$$y and this misogyny/hatred cry. Accurate interpretation of society, history, mating dance and female character and aptitude --and the history of dim sex itself-- is not "hatred". Likewise creating solutions that accept that yucky truth as starting point is not hatred.
(Or if you must, hatred has its roll: self defense. I "hate" it when a bear mauls me; I kind of hate the bear. Tying up a bear is not "hatred". (I don't actually believe in cruelty to animals. But that is not the point. The point is the animal is bad and needs to be tethered. It is not "hate" when the mauled attempt tethering.))
"Morality" demagoguery (eg denouncing people who see clearly as 'sociopaths' or 'haters') has always been the way nerds/monks have controlled and shaped society over to their liking.
Indeed psycho babble diagnosis --ie made up nonsense which is just pulled out of the ass-- is the way the latest runtdom/monkdom (called liberalism) controls society now.
===================
I believe we need more "sociopaths".
Sociopathy being an arbitrary construct...
Yes bio chemistries are recognizably different. But the definitions of "criminally insane" and sociopathy or anything like that are ARBITRARY. There is no such biological diagnosis. It is purely legalistic political funny business that by purposeful legalistic design ignores existential (surrounding issue) prerequisites.
Observe: I believe it is sociopathy to NOT abort. I believe the biochemistries that CAN'T see it that way ARE recognizably biologically different from "good people"; I deem these bio types criminally insane sociopaths. It is sociopathy to let idiots breed.
=================
We shouldn't forfeit the protectionism planks when they are the only ones that have ever won power in any system no less a system that has institutionalized demagogic protectionism.
=================
Why give the females a pass on the root discrimination that motivates all the competition and have and have-not in the world when the female movement doesn't allow the same discrimination against ugly chicks without making it a battle cry ["looks-ism" and "objectification"] and demanding change which specifically seeks to take away that male power to discriminate --even though males are already instinctually less discriminatory than the females in this very catagory of who fucks who?
Why give the female whole a pass when they do not reciprocate in kind? Indeed males ignoring the wall flowers is the original impetus for this wave of "la femme mystique" in the last 150 years we call feminism.
============
MESSAGE TO GIRLIES:
You have had sex with a man?
Meaning you get off on a man fucking you doggy style holding your hips and telling you he is going to cum ("so hold still you little creature") while you give a guttural moan into the pillow your face is in as he fills you?
If you don't want that, you understand that you are rare right? What are you going to do with all the people who do like it that way?
And if you do like it that way, saying well "that is just sex--I meant submit in social and political, legal type circles" is not good enough. The reason it is not good enough is most of your female libido is psychological. You get off on the whole scene not just the acute physical (this is wrong?). If the creature fucking you is not someone you respect (and I mean respect as a "better" an authority figure --not just some goofy word from a song) you won't be liking him enough or liking him using you like that.
And also (and this is important), if the male isn't prevented from being a creature who is better than you by the state, he naturally will be better often [except runts, which I want to ameliorate through tech]. But if the state is preventing men from being better, then it is making them submit.
So men will be submitting. Therefore your whole "nobody should submit to anyone" thing is empty, ill thought through nonsense. Especially ill thought through when one factors in that as the state prevents men from naturally displaying in ways that normal females desire, the female will start shunning them and/or moving in to treat them dominantly.
So how can females not submit to men in a system that doesn't coerce men into submission? How can wimmin be free from this submission to men without a state that makes men submit?
Again, your whole "nobody should submit to anyone" thing is empty and ill thought through.
...The female human is a non sentient child. That is my professional diagnosis. The stuff that comes out of her mouth just sounds like words, so as to trick men into providing for her expert parasitism (like a baby).
females are not broad minded, outside looking in thinkers. More like colicky babies on instinct. They will cry till the milk is gone or somebody plays deaf to them and lets them cry themselves out one time.
Do you really believe that female humans are intellectuality and physically "equal" with the best men? If not --ie if you do believe wimmin lack something some men have-- should the female submit to those men?
===========
I do know the 'devil is in the details'. ...Sitting right next to the females and the specialists.
Friday, August 20, 2010
Ethnics (?)
The whole China abortion thing...
Yes, it seems that the Chinese didn't think it [population control] through, when it comes to gender ratios.
But the important part is that they thought about it at all.
That is what separates them from the US led west.
They didn't kiss it up to make believe forces (ie god) or ask the confused horde (after the horde has been cajoled by various questionably anti social interests [media/"activists"] who strain the idea of equality/freewill/choice to say the least). They observed their population trend and resource (food supply) trend and attempted an Age of Reason, enlightened solution to a problem. It was not enlightened enough apparently. (Note that solution [population reduction] is what prevents them from invading you.)
-The baby(fetus) itself doesn't feel anything. And there is always Lidocaine etc. (Which we should demand be used!)
-And Chinese abortion is not like western birth control [modern abortion being simply the latest trick in that bag] where the capricious girl is given the power to put more "notches in her lip stick case" (ie given more power to mind fuck and play "games" with the men in her life). It is state policy, not a girl's mind-fuck shit test unlike in the "free" west.
---------
The American right is far to the left of Chinese society (as amer right is to the left of the russian sovs too). Simplistic nationalist conformity impulse (of you all-- the confused horde) prevents you from seeing that [with the useful-idiot-exploiting media laughing all the way to the bank at your expense].
Bad things about the Chinese et al are not abortion or high table attempts to rationally solve contingencies deemed problems(eg population and food trends). Bad things are like the oriental tendency to still torture [though I hate people too, but still]. And I don't like the lead poisoning thing they are (purposefully?) doing. (Though war is war. ...C'est La Guerre... It's a sneaky game america plays too in different ways. All those problems need to be solved at the gate, not just blamed on one or the other.)
==============
The females in islam are being punished LESS severely than the males are. (The whole breed over there is simply rough.)
You simply believe in "pu$$y pass" for all females everywhere and use yuck factor tricks to achieve your ends.
You believe males who don't allow pu$$y pass are "immoral".
===============
The tribal hill people of the world are the victims not the perpetrators. Europe's own romance tales explain this very eloquently (eg Braveheart, last of the Mohecians etc); though people are too dense to get it.
These hill people are being eliminated by the matriarchy that is western culture. The spreading disease.
Those like you are confused useful idiots. You might think you are oppositional to it (the matriarchal herpes sore run amok) --the same as the capitalist nonsense does-- but you are its brainwashed and long since conformed muscle; bred to the bone to be conformed to it --ie domesticated, like a dog breed culled from the wolf.
You all are too simple --ie stupid, genetically-- to get it.
==========
Some German or Austrian Nationalist said it simply: "[it is not islam per se. But it is that they are devoted combatants --the only forth right ones-- to the mammonistic west.]"
Right.
When white men have one tenth the ball sack, then they will be appealed to by the likes of me. For now you're just useful idiots for our actual enemies; enemies you call master --like the bred dogs you are.
A point about traditional western values. When a western traditionalist demagogues against islam he is demagoging against his own traditionalism. He just isn't smart enough to know this. Hence me calling him a useful idiot.
Conservatives are typically at "cross purposes" when it comes to fighting for liberalism's global crusades. But dogs of war are not good at self analysis (as I have explained elsewhere). They simply bark (motivated by instinct to bark at all things). Those that hold the leashes --the domesticators-- get the power that comes from having guard dogs.
If you do your jobs well you will be head patted and then put back in your cages without your nuts.
==========
"traditional western values". ...Which traditional western values? Viking capture and "rape"? Graeco Roman Law(which phase)? American romanticized frontiersmen polygynists and "child molesters"?
I don't have a problem with the above. I don't think traditionalists are "child molesters" or "rapists." But modern western traditions now do say they are. That was the point I was making.
============
The battle cry for western expansion is mostly stuff that is 1970's liberal extremism which has now been conformed to by the dolts of conservatism.
Conservatives resist change until it becomes "common wisdom". Then they embrace it as cosmic truth and impose it with prejudice.
As they are doing to the 3rd world now with napalm.
============
I am sick and fucking tired of people who try to stop feminism by evidencing how it is bad for females. I DON'T CARE IF IT IS BAD FOR FEMALES. Get that whole way of thinking --the trained /bred dog-way-- out of your heads. Then we wouldn't have feminism in the first place. duh.
=========
Here's a thing that is important: conservatives refuse to see that their western traditional values LOST. And by their own hand, they did. They are gone and ain't ever coming back. Never. Especially in this political, economic system.
Yes, it seems that the Chinese didn't think it [population control] through, when it comes to gender ratios.
But the important part is that they thought about it at all.
That is what separates them from the US led west.
They didn't kiss it up to make believe forces (ie god) or ask the confused horde (after the horde has been cajoled by various questionably anti social interests [media/"activists"] who strain the idea of equality/freewill/choice to say the least). They observed their population trend and resource (food supply) trend and attempted an Age of Reason, enlightened solution to a problem. It was not enlightened enough apparently. (Note that solution [population reduction] is what prevents them from invading you.)
-The baby(fetus) itself doesn't feel anything. And there is always Lidocaine etc. (Which we should demand be used!)
-And Chinese abortion is not like western birth control [modern abortion being simply the latest trick in that bag] where the capricious girl is given the power to put more "notches in her lip stick case" (ie given more power to mind fuck and play "games" with the men in her life). It is state policy, not a girl's mind-fuck shit test unlike in the "free" west.
---------
The American right is far to the left of Chinese society (as amer right is to the left of the russian sovs too). Simplistic nationalist conformity impulse (of you all-- the confused horde) prevents you from seeing that [with the useful-idiot-exploiting media laughing all the way to the bank at your expense].
Bad things about the Chinese et al are not abortion or high table attempts to rationally solve contingencies deemed problems(eg population and food trends). Bad things are like the oriental tendency to still torture [though I hate people too, but still]. And I don't like the lead poisoning thing they are (purposefully?) doing. (Though war is war. ...C'est La Guerre... It's a sneaky game america plays too in different ways. All those problems need to be solved at the gate, not just blamed on one or the other.)
==============
The females in islam are being punished LESS severely than the males are. (The whole breed over there is simply rough.)
You simply believe in "pu$$y pass" for all females everywhere and use yuck factor tricks to achieve your ends.
You believe males who don't allow pu$$y pass are "immoral".
===============
The tribal hill people of the world are the victims not the perpetrators. Europe's own romance tales explain this very eloquently (eg Braveheart, last of the Mohecians etc); though people are too dense to get it.
These hill people are being eliminated by the matriarchy that is western culture. The spreading disease.
Those like you are confused useful idiots. You might think you are oppositional to it (the matriarchal herpes sore run amok) --the same as the capitalist nonsense does-- but you are its brainwashed and long since conformed muscle; bred to the bone to be conformed to it --ie domesticated, like a dog breed culled from the wolf.
You all are too simple --ie stupid, genetically-- to get it.
==========
Some German or Austrian Nationalist said it simply: "[it is not islam per se. But it is that they are devoted combatants --the only forth right ones-- to the mammonistic west.]"
Right.
When white men have one tenth the ball sack, then they will be appealed to by the likes of me. For now you're just useful idiots for our actual enemies; enemies you call master --like the bred dogs you are.
A point about traditional western values. When a western traditionalist demagogues against islam he is demagoging against his own traditionalism. He just isn't smart enough to know this. Hence me calling him a useful idiot.
Conservatives are typically at "cross purposes" when it comes to fighting for liberalism's global crusades. But dogs of war are not good at self analysis (as I have explained elsewhere). They simply bark (motivated by instinct to bark at all things). Those that hold the leashes --the domesticators-- get the power that comes from having guard dogs.
If you do your jobs well you will be head patted and then put back in your cages without your nuts.
==========
"traditional western values". ...Which traditional western values? Viking capture and "rape"? Graeco Roman Law(which phase)? American romanticized frontiersmen polygynists and "child molesters"?
I don't have a problem with the above. I don't think traditionalists are "child molesters" or "rapists." But modern western traditions now do say they are. That was the point I was making.
============
The battle cry for western expansion is mostly stuff that is 1970's liberal extremism which has now been conformed to by the dolts of conservatism.
Conservatives resist change until it becomes "common wisdom". Then they embrace it as cosmic truth and impose it with prejudice.
As they are doing to the 3rd world now with napalm.
============
I am sick and fucking tired of people who try to stop feminism by evidencing how it is bad for females. I DON'T CARE IF IT IS BAD FOR FEMALES. Get that whole way of thinking --the trained /bred dog-way-- out of your heads. Then we wouldn't have feminism in the first place. duh.
=========
Here's a thing that is important: conservatives refuse to see that their western traditional values LOST. And by their own hand, they did. They are gone and ain't ever coming back. Never. Especially in this political, economic system.
more more more.
==============
Rape is already a crime according to American law. American law has evidence procedures and punishments.
The college seeks --the wimmins studies commissars of that college seek-- to go around those procedures laws and punishments. They do this by saying the college is a private club that the accused voluntarily joins. Like a golf club is a private club.
But since college is not just a private club but rather a very publicly funded vector into economic and social etc success, duke can not legally create burdens that go above the surrounding laws of the land --especially if these burdens fall on only certain classes, races and genders more than others.
Remember, rape is already against the law according to american law. This duke thing is not about rape or sexual assault. It is about discriminatorially putting tariffs on men who joined the duke club (a club the college calls private but which is actually a publicly funded institution).
Not to mention the duke "rape" policy's premise is rooted in assumptions which rely on gender behavior _stereotypes_, sexist curricula and sexist interpretations of men and wimmins (sexist, regardless of how well couched) and therefore the premise violates duke's or any colleges' PC hate speech codes. The gender behavior _stereotypes_ and sexist curricula etc which (undergird the duke 'rape' bylaws) create a hostile, discriminatory psychology damaging environment for all men whether accused of a breech of by-law etiquette (eg duke "rape") or not.
Pro fem will say that american society is unfairly stacked against rape accusers and therefore duke "rape" by-laws are necessary since wimmins can't just go to state authority and receive 'justice'. But that is simply a made up contention. (Made up by political activists, note.) There is plenty of evidence that american society is governed by a ceiling painting that is actually very much biased in _favor of females_. It is also irrelevant.
---
[Some dame above] or whoever said "the duke punishments for "rape" are more lenient than the polices'.
Ludicrous sophistry. The duke punishments(confiscating tuition, blackballing from certain career paths etc) are for made up crimes--_NOT RECOGNIZED BY THE STATE_ as rape-- which duke's wimmins studies religion simply calls "rape". Any punishment for duke "rape" is more harsh than any the state COULD impose _since the state couldn't impose any for "duke "rape""_. If a real crime was committed the school would call the state authorities.
----------------
I don't know how to do or even say what I'm getting at above. But that is still the approach one would take when suing. Duke (like any college) favors itself a club which wants people to sign away their constitutional rights; the new rights duke then seeks are unconstitutionally biased based on race and gender. Duke (like any college) pretends it is private and therefore able to create what ever membership criteria it wants. But it is actually a public institution which people must go through to achieve crucial goals which can only be achieved through that institution and also it is publicly funded and therefore subject to the actual laws of the land.
Just like a state can't make a law that subverts a larger federal law, a college can not take away constitutionally protected rights just by hiding behind this shiftable lie that college is a private club.
==================
Did anyone think to ask her for evidence for those claims?
The answer of course is 'no'.
...Reason number 17 million, six hundred and forty five thousand, 7 hundred and 42 why democracy is no good.
Also the purpose of anglo world juris prudence is not to make it easier for the accuser of any crime. The point is to protect the citizens --especially innocent ones-- from unfair burden and conviction and state tyranny. So therefore even if the bald faced contention by Harmon et al was accurate in and of itself (which it is not and has no legitimate evidence) it doesn't matter anyway for the purpose is to protect the innocent from state power not to make it "easier" for wimmin or any accusers.
Did anyone think to say that in rebuttal to her?
Again, the answer of course is 'no'.
...Reason number 17 million, six hundred and forty five thousand, 7 hundred and 43 why democracy is no good.
=================
=================
.......
A lot of WNs see anything white culture has done as a cosmic-ordained truth that must be spread virulently as god's ordination. (It is all part of the conformity module that makes the conservative male a conservative at the bio determinist level.)
Since feminism (nee chivalry) is a white culture thing it is therefore an example of white "betterness".
(Note that conservatives have now embraced 1970's divorce culture as their white male battle cry, along with other feminist rally-cries such as gender legal appointments etc. Note what the west imposes in iraq and afganistan: female judges shipped in from the west.)
============
[Some conservative guy] saw a Frontline documentary on sex slavery.
Lo fucking L.
Behold a conservative.
ROTFL
What did CNN and MSNBC tell you about sex slavery? Better wait for sweeps month though so you'll get better low angle camera work. You dolt.
------------
You mean "fuck her".
You have conformed to the feminist definition of rape, like the git you inherently are for genetic reasons.
Why should "Men'sRightsActivists" be concerned about that conformity to feminist/chivalrous epistemology: "Rape" [in Capital note, LOL, you dolt].
I'm far more concerned about boys in western culture than whores from the 3rd world. And too boot, the boys in western culture (be they under the single fem parent or in the compulsory eduction system) did not aspire to this system in any way, unlike whores who are low IQ lying whores (probably vicious too --though weaklings) for genetic reasons (similar to your daughter as I mentioned).
Boys are not low IQ whores who aspire to giving blow jobs for a living being catered to by a species that constantly defers to their needs and desires.
You should immolate at once. It is the chivalrous thing to do.
=============
The phony men rights groups are there to trick noobs into falling into the wrong group. It attempts to "hijack" the naive and make them useful idiots.
The phenom is seen with the pro feminist 'men's rights' groups (where males are admonished for not helping females solve their problems), that popped up after real anti feminist men's rights groups started to appear.
=================
People are mostly not self aware; they respond to inner compulsions
===============
That expos`e against aspects of WN doesn't change the fact that the jews are parasitic racists. They exploit the goy as useful idiots accordingly. Whether jews know this or not about themselves and the dynamic they are a part of is irrelevant to the fact that that is the way it all goes down in the eyes of "Darwinism".
I as a white male certainly know about this racism every time I go to a doctor or lawyer or govt building. ...I'd be better off as an Amer Indian going to the cavalry doctor to have my bow arm healed.
And WWII was not fought to stop hitler from "invading the world-in the name racism and eugenics" (falsely defined as "putting people-in camps"). You idiot sheep. Americans and anglos were just as racist as the germans (if not more so) and had a policy of racist culling-expansion long before hitler made one annexation speech about the pined for austro hungarian empire (a living memory grievance from WWI). You dolts for genetic reasons.
(The jew mode average IQ(112?) is higher than the average of whiteness(99)--the moron disaster that classical liberalism (and civilization in general) keeps alive. 112 to 99: Almost 1 standard deviation[ca 15 IQ points] --the same between blacks and whites [blacks at 87, whites at 99]. If white belief is so and so against blacks cause the blacks are dumb what should the whites allow the jews to do to whites, I ask.)
===============
A salient feature about the SC nom is that she is a bushite when it comes to wiretapping and the like (jew hypocrit). This is the 2nd obvious time obama put a chicken hawk in posts: Both that saber rattling ass dick holbreck** (jew) and now her. But I would never ever say she was ugly --she has been hurt enough by the non self aware horde she seeks to get back at. I might say she's got matt broderick's eyes/genes. (And she does.)
(**Obama appointed holbreck on the day obama was sworn in, with special-called press conference about it (a message to someone). Or was it the night he was elected that he held a special press conference about it!!?? Everyone knows I aint the conspiracy monger type but that strains credulity! The republicans won't point it out 'cause they are glad he put a war hawk on the job.)
This frog minister situation... Her salient feature is pure hypocrisy. Painting with a broad brush/stereotyping men; sexism and state run discrimination; denial of core left tenet of "nurture syndromes --often institutional/systemic(ie culture wide prejudices)-- make people the losers they are"; and more hypocrisies I am too weak to see without reading the thing again. Somebody else should point them out, staying on message.
And then there is the media's hypocrisy, where they will black ball a bob metzger (WAR : "white aryan resistance") type outright but then put the prejudiced bigots-towards-men-- feminists-- on the toob saying that it needs to be seen so people will know. BS! Just Black Ball the feminists outright too.
=================
=================
User LSP is very very correct when he says that classical liberalism --capitalism and the utopian runt parade (as though the Georgian court and English parliament back then weren't already runty enough)-- are the root problem and the reason "we" can't get ourselves out of this mess. The fact you all can't see it for yourselves(even after it is explained) doesn't bode well.
=================
...What's the best thing that ever happen to a wimmin's self esteem?... Morning Wood. (Yes you may use that joke for a reasonable remittance of royalty.)
Rape is already a crime according to American law. American law has evidence procedures and punishments.
The college seeks --the wimmins studies commissars of that college seek-- to go around those procedures laws and punishments. They do this by saying the college is a private club that the accused voluntarily joins. Like a golf club is a private club.
But since college is not just a private club but rather a very publicly funded vector into economic and social etc success, duke can not legally create burdens that go above the surrounding laws of the land --especially if these burdens fall on only certain classes, races and genders more than others.
Remember, rape is already against the law according to american law. This duke thing is not about rape or sexual assault. It is about discriminatorially putting tariffs on men who joined the duke club (a club the college calls private but which is actually a publicly funded institution).
Not to mention the duke "rape" policy's premise is rooted in assumptions which rely on gender behavior _stereotypes_, sexist curricula and sexist interpretations of men and wimmins (sexist, regardless of how well couched) and therefore the premise violates duke's or any colleges' PC hate speech codes. The gender behavior _stereotypes_ and sexist curricula etc which (undergird the duke 'rape' bylaws) create a hostile, discriminatory psychology damaging environment for all men whether accused of a breech of by-law etiquette (eg duke "rape") or not.
Pro fem will say that american society is unfairly stacked against rape accusers and therefore duke "rape" by-laws are necessary since wimmins can't just go to state authority and receive 'justice'. But that is simply a made up contention. (Made up by political activists, note.) There is plenty of evidence that american society is governed by a ceiling painting that is actually very much biased in _favor of females_. It is also irrelevant.
---
[Some dame above] or whoever said "the duke punishments for "rape" are more lenient than the polices'.
Ludicrous sophistry. The duke punishments(confiscating tuition, blackballing from certain career paths etc) are for made up crimes--_NOT RECOGNIZED BY THE STATE_ as rape-- which duke's wimmins studies religion simply calls "rape". Any punishment for duke "rape" is more harsh than any the state COULD impose _since the state couldn't impose any for "duke "rape""_. If a real crime was committed the school would call the state authorities.
----------------
I don't know how to do or even say what I'm getting at above. But that is still the approach one would take when suing. Duke (like any college) favors itself a club which wants people to sign away their constitutional rights; the new rights duke then seeks are unconstitutionally biased based on race and gender. Duke (like any college) pretends it is private and therefore able to create what ever membership criteria it wants. But it is actually a public institution which people must go through to achieve crucial goals which can only be achieved through that institution and also it is publicly funded and therefore subject to the actual laws of the land.
Just like a state can't make a law that subverts a larger federal law, a college can not take away constitutionally protected rights just by hiding behind this shiftable lie that college is a private club.
==================
[A new] plan [to hide the accused rapist's identity] would prevent other victims of serial rapists from coming forward.
Miss Harman said the move would 'turn the clock back' and send a 'devastating message' to rape victims that they should not be believed.
'By making rape defendants anonymous you are going to make it harder to bring rapists to justice.'
feminist pressure groups, ...said it would tip justice and public opinion in favor of the defendants.
Did anyone think to ask her for evidence for those claims?
The answer of course is 'no'.
...Reason number 17 million, six hundred and forty five thousand, 7 hundred and 42 why democracy is no good.
Also the purpose of anglo world juris prudence is not to make it easier for the accuser of any crime. The point is to protect the citizens --especially innocent ones-- from unfair burden and conviction and state tyranny. So therefore even if the bald faced contention by Harmon et al was accurate in and of itself (which it is not and has no legitimate evidence) it doesn't matter anyway for the purpose is to protect the innocent from state power not to make it "easier" for wimmin or any accusers.
Did anyone think to say that in rebuttal to her?
Again, the answer of course is 'no'.
...Reason number 17 million, six hundred and forty five thousand, 7 hundred and 43 why democracy is no good.
=================
=================
.......
A lot of WNs see anything white culture has done as a cosmic-ordained truth that must be spread virulently as god's ordination. (It is all part of the conformity module that makes the conservative male a conservative at the bio determinist level.)
Since feminism (nee chivalry) is a white culture thing it is therefore an example of white "betterness".
(Note that conservatives have now embraced 1970's divorce culture as their white male battle cry, along with other feminist rally-cries such as gender legal appointments etc. Note what the west imposes in iraq and afganistan: female judges shipped in from the west.)
============
[Some conservative guy] saw a Frontline documentary on sex slavery.
Lo fucking L.
Behold a conservative.
ROTFL
What did CNN and MSNBC tell you about sex slavery? Better wait for sweeps month though so you'll get better low angle camera work. You dolt.
------------
You mean "fuck her".
You have conformed to the feminist definition of rape, like the git you inherently are for genetic reasons.
Why should "Men'sRightsActivists" be concerned about that conformity to feminist/chivalrous epistemology: "Rape" [in Capital note, LOL, you dolt].
I'm far more concerned about boys in western culture than whores from the 3rd world. And too boot, the boys in western culture (be they under the single fem parent or in the compulsory eduction system) did not aspire to this system in any way, unlike whores who are low IQ lying whores (probably vicious too --though weaklings) for genetic reasons (similar to your daughter as I mentioned).
Boys are not low IQ whores who aspire to giving blow jobs for a living being catered to by a species that constantly defers to their needs and desires.
You should immolate at once. It is the chivalrous thing to do.
=============
The phony men rights groups are there to trick noobs into falling into the wrong group. It attempts to "hijack" the naive and make them useful idiots.
The phenom is seen with the pro feminist 'men's rights' groups (where males are admonished for not helping females solve their problems), that popped up after real anti feminist men's rights groups started to appear.
=================
People are mostly not self aware; they respond to inner compulsions
===============
That expos`e against aspects of WN doesn't change the fact that the jews are parasitic racists. They exploit the goy as useful idiots accordingly. Whether jews know this or not about themselves and the dynamic they are a part of is irrelevant to the fact that that is the way it all goes down in the eyes of "Darwinism".
I as a white male certainly know about this racism every time I go to a doctor or lawyer or govt building. ...I'd be better off as an Amer Indian going to the cavalry doctor to have my bow arm healed.
And WWII was not fought to stop hitler from "invading the world-in the name racism and eugenics" (falsely defined as "putting people-in camps"). You idiot sheep. Americans and anglos were just as racist as the germans (if not more so) and had a policy of racist culling-expansion long before hitler made one annexation speech about the pined for austro hungarian empire (a living memory grievance from WWI). You dolts for genetic reasons.
(The jew mode average IQ(112?) is higher than the average of whiteness(99)--the moron disaster that classical liberalism (and civilization in general) keeps alive. 112 to 99: Almost 1 standard deviation[ca 15 IQ points] --the same between blacks and whites [blacks at 87, whites at 99]. If white belief is so and so against blacks cause the blacks are dumb what should the whites allow the jews to do to whites, I ask.)
===============
A salient feature about the SC nom is that she is a bushite when it comes to wiretapping and the like (jew hypocrit). This is the 2nd obvious time obama put a chicken hawk in posts: Both that saber rattling ass dick holbreck** (jew) and now her. But I would never ever say she was ugly --she has been hurt enough by the non self aware horde she seeks to get back at. I might say she's got matt broderick's eyes/genes. (And she does.)
(**Obama appointed holbreck on the day obama was sworn in, with special-called press conference about it (a message to someone). Or was it the night he was elected that he held a special press conference about it!!?? Everyone knows I aint the conspiracy monger type but that strains credulity! The republicans won't point it out 'cause they are glad he put a war hawk on the job.)
This frog minister situation... Her salient feature is pure hypocrisy. Painting with a broad brush/stereotyping men; sexism and state run discrimination; denial of core left tenet of "nurture syndromes --often institutional/systemic(ie culture wide prejudices)-- make people the losers they are"; and more hypocrisies I am too weak to see without reading the thing again. Somebody else should point them out, staying on message.
And then there is the media's hypocrisy, where they will black ball a bob metzger (WAR : "white aryan resistance") type outright but then put the prejudiced bigots-towards-men-- feminists-- on the toob saying that it needs to be seen so people will know. BS! Just Black Ball the feminists outright too.
=================
=================
User LSP is very very correct when he says that classical liberalism --capitalism and the utopian runt parade (as though the Georgian court and English parliament back then weren't already runty enough)-- are the root problem and the reason "we" can't get ourselves out of this mess. The fact you all can't see it for yourselves(even after it is explained) doesn't bode well.
=================
...What's the best thing that ever happen to a wimmin's self esteem?... Morning Wood. (Yes you may use that joke for a reasonable remittance of royalty.)
More too.
Mediocre stuff here. It isn't long for this world.
When a fem deems you rational /acceptable... It comes under the point I made about a dog humping the leg of politeness. The dumb beast can't separate niceness from weakness; she can't tell whether we are "rational" or not-- she lacks the processing power for congenital reasons. Therefore if she thinks we are rational and not "[wimmin] haters" and stuff she means she finds us non threatening. [As such, she will continue to hump.]
Some strains are simply incorrigible and need to be "put down". Even though I am a big proponent of "it's all nurture syndrome", some strains needing to be put down is simply the easy truth. At the very least, in order to make an omelet (ie the future utopia[tm] where we think-all-things-through including nurture syndromes), we need to break a few eggs.
==================
You can't see it the other way. It is female supremacy in its most quaint (and dangerous) form. Princess and the pea.
==================
females cheat rampantly. And they do lots of other things to hurt their mates in relationships. Why doesn't feminism advocate fault based divorce again if the females are under siege in marriage? (ahem, cricket, cricket.)
And "burdensome" is relative construct. The princess complained about a pea 13 mattresses below but it was not really a burden; and babies cry for free milk on instinct. Alas so do wimmin.
And the "current economic welfare of the west" is a huge, huge topic. To just say "it can't exist without wimmin getting these privileges" is balderdash. Number one we don't need this giant "economic welfare". So therefore even if disenfranchising wimmins hurts the west, big deal--GOOD. And number two most of the social expenses of the "economic welfare of the west" are female based; so fewer "independent" females generating western economic welfare equals fewer payoffs to "independent females". Duh. And most of the non social expenses--ie infrastructure and military--are here to make it safe for "independent" females and protect the west from anti feminist enemies.
==========
"...Mothers raise their sons to be creatures that they themselves would not be attracted to if it wasn't their son and rather just some prospective lover…"
This "the product of my female labor belongs to me the female creator" is another empty horseshit thing to say which the cunts and their society have no intention of applying consistently.
Mother raises children badly often and therefore should be prevented from doing it whethee their "property" or not.
=============
I find the single fem environment horrible to the psychological health of male children and the school system also.
==========
A bad vibe she has is: "[the pussy is given out for free these days: be happy [ie don't complain]]"
She is a female supremacist who believes males are dufuses to be manipulated _with impunity,_ controlled and owned.
And ya know what: she is right! After centuries and centuries of western males culling each other based on movements where anybody who was better is vulnerable to ousting, we are left with a culture led by males who are bonobo-like infantile numbskulls and females who are tuned-in, en-fanged top-down above it all types.
(These dames are like me in reverse actually; but I'm a rare throw back _and marginal._ And also these above it all females lack real scope of thought which I have [haughty snort]; they are only wise when it comes to social manipulation of the infantile gitdom that is the west. They don't actually understand anything deep or profound; nor are they self aware.)
_______________
=============
Adoption is often no good. (Trust me I know. My mother is an adopted creature.) Parents need to sense their children; not just feed them and house them. It is one thing to foster a foundling or orphan. But to make more of them --just pretending that the creature will be raised right and their won't be unique problem snowballs multi generationally setting in --is ABSURD.
If all people were clones--aptitude and character wise-- and if parenting was done according to a schematic list (of dos and don'ts in detail) which achieved predicted outcome that could be tested for then maybe adoption and other surrogacy programs could work.
You know what happens when a dumb(95-100), needy labor class German woman (happy to just finally have any "bundle of perfection that can do no wrong") adopts an approx 130 ish IQ manipulative colicky girl?
Hell on earth.
Hopefully I can give you a little taste of Hell before you all die natural deaths. And I do mean that. That's called consequence: something most need to learn first hand.
===============
{I actually do not always hit the target for the same reason a lion doesn't get a tommy gazelle--it's all chase but little meat: we are two different planes of creature.}
=============
Britches.
A mounted aristocracy took over most of north Eurasia in the last 6000 years, as the horse was domesticated. (Some might have found horse proto-domestication as far back as the early teens; Spain. But maybe not ridden. Eaten, like Finland's reindeer?)
Tunics"[barbarians]. "Togas"[civilized]. Kilts [Barbarians Mk 1].
Only worn in conservative (ie old fashion) ceremonies.
----
Penguin Books 'atlases of history' from when I was younger and still gave a fuck about book 'learnin.
When a fem deems you rational /acceptable... It comes under the point I made about a dog humping the leg of politeness. The dumb beast can't separate niceness from weakness; she can't tell whether we are "rational" or not-- she lacks the processing power for congenital reasons. Therefore if she thinks we are rational and not "[wimmin] haters" and stuff she means she finds us non threatening. [As such, she will continue to hump.]
Some strains are simply incorrigible and need to be "put down". Even though I am a big proponent of "it's all nurture syndrome", some strains needing to be put down is simply the easy truth. At the very least, in order to make an omelet (ie the future utopia[tm] where we think-all-things-through including nurture syndromes), we need to break a few eggs.
==================
You can't see it the other way. It is female supremacy in its most quaint (and dangerous) form. Princess and the pea.
==================
females cheat rampantly. And they do lots of other things to hurt their mates in relationships. Why doesn't feminism advocate fault based divorce again if the females are under siege in marriage? (ahem, cricket, cricket.)
And "burdensome" is relative construct. The princess complained about a pea 13 mattresses below but it was not really a burden; and babies cry for free milk on instinct. Alas so do wimmin.
And the "current economic welfare of the west" is a huge, huge topic. To just say "it can't exist without wimmin getting these privileges" is balderdash. Number one we don't need this giant "economic welfare". So therefore even if disenfranchising wimmins hurts the west, big deal--GOOD. And number two most of the social expenses of the "economic welfare of the west" are female based; so fewer "independent" females generating western economic welfare equals fewer payoffs to "independent females". Duh. And most of the non social expenses--ie infrastructure and military--are here to make it safe for "independent" females and protect the west from anti feminist enemies.
==========
"...Mothers raise their sons to be creatures that they themselves would not be attracted to if it wasn't their son and rather just some prospective lover…"
This "the product of my female labor belongs to me the female creator" is another empty horseshit thing to say which the cunts and their society have no intention of applying consistently.
Mother raises children badly often and therefore should be prevented from doing it whethee their "property" or not.
=============
I find the single fem environment horrible to the psychological health of male children and the school system also.
==========
A bad vibe she has is: "[the pussy is given out for free these days: be happy [ie don't complain]]"
She is a female supremacist who believes males are dufuses to be manipulated _with impunity,_ controlled and owned.
And ya know what: she is right! After centuries and centuries of western males culling each other based on movements where anybody who was better is vulnerable to ousting, we are left with a culture led by males who are bonobo-like infantile numbskulls and females who are tuned-in, en-fanged top-down above it all types.
(These dames are like me in reverse actually; but I'm a rare throw back _and marginal._ And also these above it all females lack real scope of thought which I have [haughty snort]; they are only wise when it comes to social manipulation of the infantile gitdom that is the west. They don't actually understand anything deep or profound; nor are they self aware.)
_______________
=============
Adoption is often no good. (Trust me I know. My mother is an adopted creature.) Parents need to sense their children; not just feed them and house them. It is one thing to foster a foundling or orphan. But to make more of them --just pretending that the creature will be raised right and their won't be unique problem snowballs multi generationally setting in --is ABSURD.
If all people were clones--aptitude and character wise-- and if parenting was done according to a schematic list (of dos and don'ts in detail) which achieved predicted outcome that could be tested for then maybe adoption and other surrogacy programs could work.
You know what happens when a dumb(95-100), needy labor class German woman (happy to just finally have any "bundle of perfection that can do no wrong") adopts an approx 130 ish IQ manipulative colicky girl?
Hell on earth.
Hopefully I can give you a little taste of Hell before you all die natural deaths. And I do mean that. That's called consequence: something most need to learn first hand.
===============
{I actually do not always hit the target for the same reason a lion doesn't get a tommy gazelle--it's all chase but little meat: we are two different planes of creature.}
=============
Britches.
A mounted aristocracy took over most of north Eurasia in the last 6000 years, as the horse was domesticated. (Some might have found horse proto-domestication as far back as the early teens; Spain. But maybe not ridden. Eaten, like Finland's reindeer?)
Tunics"[barbarians]. "Togas"[civilized]. Kilts [Barbarians Mk 1].
Only worn in conservative (ie old fashion) ceremonies.
----
Penguin Books 'atlases of history' from when I was younger and still gave a fuck about book 'learnin.
Saturday, March 27, 2010
New Pearls.
Since people are dumb and they need to have things said in different ways in order to comprehend them and since this stuff bears repeating, I am posting some more. (Though most everything necessary has already been said.)
____________
============
Cosmic determinism.
Cause and effect domino effects. Nothing mystical.
Domino effects on the scale of hydrogen-cloud(nebulae) collapse (created by some pressure density event [wave]); then stars and their planets; then star ist kaput creating new pressure density events.
Just like with that, there is cause and effect on the planets too. It gets a little more complicated to say the least but it still is simple determinism. Just like the star birth cause and effect --"cosmic determinism".
====================
Dimorphic sex for vertebrates and how understanding that is relevant to 'our' cause...
The point is to keep her stunted.
There is no reason to allow here to mature: she will just masculinize and make trouble for men. Especially make trouble for men who are specifically stunted by modern peace goals. (Peace goals are created by men as their attempted solution to the culling matches female sexual value naturally instigates.) These peace goals between the males cause the males to be bred/culled and trained to be gits so as to make them less threatening to each other.
The females if allowed to mature are _naturally_ triggered into dominance attempts--and other behaviors hurtful to the men of the 'peace bred society'--by the display the 'peaceful' males exhibit.
The more sappy the society makes males the more sappy and stunted the females have to be in order to still be the females.
A little analogy to help the dense understand... If we turn our grizzly bear species into a panda bear species, we have to make sure and make the females into pandas too. If not, the grizzly females--normally dominated by and triggered into submission to the male grizzlies-- will make mince meat out of the panda males.
Note that our society is about to collapse specifically because of a stated and unstated goal to stop "uppity" females. If the liberal males of the last few centuries would have simply stunted the females too along with trying to forge the new peaceful man, their liberal society might have worked. But by not stunting the females --and indeed allowing and prompting female aggression (which is the inevitable side effect of too many git males in her presence)-- they damned their society at its inception.
Most of you are too stupid --for genetic reasons-- to get this simple, simple stuff. Unfortunately.
All our "opinions" about this are not equal (regardless of what your mother tells you). I understand more about the root fundamentals than most. (The fact you all didn't learn these fundamentals for yourselves as you grew is note worthy and a grand indictment of the "age of reason".) As such I see the way it all works in practice better.
----------------------
The other aspect of dim sex and how it is relevant to our struggle is fem sex value...
Females are "more valuable". This is why males are better at everything: Sperm egg ratio is such that a bottle necks forms around the egg. The males battle through this bottle neck; selection only allows some males through thus making them 'better'.
Either male vs male direct aggression is the culling force [eg bears or lion etc] or female choice is the culling force [eg flying birds, insects, some fish etc].
That is fact of Universe.
If you don't like the way that fact is spun at academia or media then you don't advocate suppression of this fact. You advocate murder of the git males (elimination of their bio chemistries) who create the fem empowerment spin.
Killing those git males is ultimately part of your/my reproductive strategy for getting through that bottleneck. As the git's spin of nature _used as deference payment to female vanity_ is their strategy for getting through that bottleneck. Since the gits are cowards and runts, deference to female caprice is their only hope of winning reproduction.
Note that you and I --we-- are trying to reinstate the bear or lion form of culling. While the gits in charge of this modern upside world are trying to more fully cement in their bird strategy for culling "us" bears/lions out of the way... as we all spiral towards the egg through the bottle neck.
"Either male vs male direct aggression is the culling force [eg bears or lion etc] or female choice is the culling force [eg flying birds, insects, some fish etc]."
Either way, females are "more valuable".
This is a great irony of dimorphic sexuality since dim sex originates(for proto vertebrates) as an emasculation attack by the mature hermaphrodite (male) directed at a younger hermaphrodite (female). The irony is the victors through their victory (ie creating females) actually made things tougher on themselves since males do have tougher lives (whether in male combat species [bears/lions] or female-as-chooser species [birds, insects]).
But yes, the females are still emasculated stunted males by nature*. That's what you want to hear. You are looking for an empowerment argument from nature; same as liberals. Liberals just have to pound square pegs into round holes and then censor the challenges to the illogic. (*female as stunted creature by nature is massively suppressed fact of our evolution _by all sides._)
Liberals hype up the fem sex value aspect of dim sex; And also the specifically female choice dynamics [eg birds, insects etc] and extrapolate to all nature and use as an "argument ad naturalism" to vindicate the modern western female-as-chooser bird-like dynamic [which gits need --it's their only possible chance]; Meanwhile conservatives try to hype up the male vigor aspects of the male as warrior dynamics (bears, lions). Conservatives are hamstrung in their empowerment attempt by their allies in the anti nature creationist and fuddy duddy "moralist"(effete) community. (Moralist fuddy duddies are the bird-like gits that vectored us into this female-as-chooser dynamic in the first place.)
==============
A good example of the absurdity that comes from spinning biology into "nature as female empowerment display" is "females come before males".
Nonsense. A-sexual organisms come first; then hermaphrodites; then dim sex. One can not have "females" or "males" without the other--absurd. (Dim Sex formed a couple separate times through parallelism.)
They concoct the 'fems come first' absurdity from the fact that A-sexual organisms have parts that later become female parts.
"Female lions pick mates." They observed females go to new brunette stuffed males more than new blond/red males. Fine. But how blinded by political "relativism" does one need to be to not see male lions KILLING EACH OTHER IN WARS complete with coalition flanking and diversionary maneuvering!!? (Panzer Battalion strikes again! [It's actually Pz Abteilung.])
Same with the elephant "matriarchy". Nonsense. Male elephants fight to the death and the winner male fucks his choice at his leisure. It is like claiming that a harem parlor --filled with lounging dames-- is a matriarchy cause sometimes Sultan isn't in there. _How blinded with bigotry does one have to be to not see a giant --no, a JUMBO-- male elephant in must?_
(That is a main reason I ignore this "matriarchy/ patriarchy" blabber. It is all ill defined just so tales.)
A specifically human example of the absurdity that comes from trying to spin everything bio science into pro female display is "female open callosum" brain is better than male human single hemisphere brain". ...Pigs, deers, horses, crocodiles etc all have open callosum brains. The male human has the single hemi focused brain and only the male human has left Erda. Coincidence?
Not to mention liberals are shameless hypocrites: One minute it is "we are all the same and biology isn't real"; the next it is "biology is real and females are better --even if we gotta pound square pegs into round holes and shamelessly censor --and excommunicate those 'in league with the devil'-- to make it so".
There are tons of socio anthro babble [not really biology per se] matriarchy /patriarchy fem empowerment absurdities. (List some yourselves.)
We are definitely in a dark age when it comes to bio science -- and especially gender bio science. You conservatives--most especially Americans-- played your part in building that by being stubborn gits who couldn't(and still can't) get certain stuff. Liberals exploited accordingly until their citadel like control was complete. Now we are in a dark age.
-----------------------
FYI, Erda is an old Norse goddess; it is our modern word Earth.
I meant men have built all this crap, including stuff _that leaves Earth_ --even though "handicapped" by only having half a brain. (poor dears) :roll: Meanwhile the mighty wimmins/mouse/crocodile open brain has... um has... Now give me a second and I'll come up with something.
Ah got it: gossiped about ass.
=========
That is a complexity issue that people always point to as another example of how non natural humans are --how above reality itself we are.
While I don't have it figured out entirely it is something like this...
The fathers (and his top sons) are achieving and holding rank so that they can be as reproductively valuable as the females. (Note females do nothing but just show up and be healthy to be as valuable.) The way _those_ fathers hold rank is by having lots of mules that work and fight on behalf of him (and his number one son(s)) and the land needed to sustain that continuum. Those main 'top dog' genes are the main things making it through the bottle neck of fem sex value; the extra sons are a type of husk around the kernels.
This question and concern of your's is more valid than a dame's last one about "self awareness"/ Why creatures are motivated to do what they do. (I explained that one. She was simply wrong there because wimmins are "too close" in their thinking; they lack big picture objectivity.) This 'I want sons' thing is a more important thing you have brought up.
There are other similar examples like that too. Wife immolation(healthy fem killed and buried with high rank man); dowry paid to boys family.
Like I said I don't have this all figured out yet. But the dim sex premise I explained earlier is still valid and accurate. This "I am compelled to want sons" [compulsions are created by chemical modules] is simply a "god of the gaps" issue. ("God of the gaps" = a profundity that hasn't been figured out which doubters use to throw a monkey wrench into the premise.) It is a complexity issue that doesn't negate the premise; it just muddies it.
Also the whole thing might be spandrels. A trait that is just going along for the ride --like ornaments on a cathedral.
(More later if I think of a better, smoother way of explaining this. Good shot dopey girl!)
(Just FYI note "culture" is some kind of expression of underlying natural reality.)
===============
Self awareness and compulsions...
Males aspire because they have compulsions to achieve. (A compulsion is created by chemical chain reactions.) These specific compulsions have been selected more often than other compulsions, from the litter of extended siblings, given the energy conservation principle[finite food] and specifically female sexual value(bottle neck growing from the sperm to egg ratio).
Female humans aspire because they have compulsions to make it harder for males to just get "some" easily; "shit test". These compulsions have been selected once again by energy conversion/conservation BUT specifically... creating chaos and boundaries around reproductions is making her children (ie her compulsions /chemical conversion trends) more effective in some way. (Simply, it is inducing competition and then having that chaos separate the men from the boys.)
(Chemical chain reactions vary. Only some will be selected as efficient at converting more finite food into more of that chain reaction assembly line. The deemed-efficient is selected by an unwitting varying environment.)
To put it even more simply. A male aspires to rock stardom so he can get a chick to become a weak kneed dick sucker. A female aspires to rock stardom so her knees won't just become weak when a male rock star points at his package.
But to say people join up for "honor" or "protection" reasons...
...A red mud tribe(ocher in hair) was asked why they were at war with the blue mud tribe(wode in hair) [they both descend from the white lime in hair culture earlier --blue tribe finding itself by a part of a river bank where wode was exposed, and red tribe finding itself by some other bank of the river where ocher was exposed]. A rud mudder says "Well duh, just look at them... They have blue mud in their hair".
Deeper analysis is not something a joiner has a compulsion towards.
I put that little bit above about the tribes not really knowing what they were fighting for other than their collective feeling that the other tribe sucked ass so as to try to grapple with something. It was meant to be poetic.
Once there was a whale watching boat. College girls on it and a man. (Lets call that man Sean.)
So the whales jump out of the water and smash back down on to the water. Sean says, "do you know why they do that? Only boy whales do it."
...Confused silence.
Sean continues, "it is reproductive display scaring other males away using the conductivity of water to convey size and strength."
The girls, basically in unison, go "Nuh uh. It probably just feels good." [And the 'nays' have it. ...Gotta love democracy.]
Well of course it feels good. But good feelings are compulsions created by bio chemical modules. Out of all the bio chemical modules that formed (rolling around on the ocean floor, pissing in your own face, standing upside down in a volcano plume) --all of which feel good to the doer-- that "jumping out of the water makes me feel good" module did best; ie was 'selected' by the complex unwitting environment more often.
I --er uh Sean-- stated why that module got selected ("scared other males away") but Sean didn't say the whale knew this about his motivation. It simply felt good to him. Sean didn't think that he had to break it down to CAVEMAN BRAIN level for the um "feminine mind" of the world to get it.
Male Lions' midnight belly-grunt festival is the same as the whale jump: an impulse that feels good to the doer but it got unwittingly selected for "intimidation display" reasons (it scared younger smaller male(s) away).
To understand how unwitting selection of modules works, think leopard spots (a cutaneous system bio chemical module). Out of all the other kitten variations, the module that coincidentally unwittingly [since it is just some protein polymers in a goop] created a pattern that mimic'd dappled sunlight did best for reasons unknown to the victorious over-the-other-kittens leopard him/her self.
We then as humans from an outside looking in perspective figure out why that particular cutaneous module did best. We say: stalk pounce ambush predator [as opposed to run the prey down predator] benefits from having camouflage; the camo could mimic some environment feature (or be pattern diffusion/confusion like Zebras or WWI battleships). Eg dappled sunlight coming thru trees.
Same with orgasm module. Same with any other module that has benefited the host it makes up. The modules don't --and the host itself doesn't-- need to know it is the most efficient energy converting trait in an amoral energy based universe for it to "win". It simply "wins" for reasons that go over its "head".
Now back to pussy (the be all end all of our little corner of the universe here)...
Avril Lavign (or who ever) aspires because it feels good. But by doing so she limits (even further) the amount of boys who are eligible breeding stock. Shit test. Avril Lavign doesn't need to know this about the module that compels "aspiring".
GI Joe aspires because it feels good to him. Ie he has modules which compel 'this a way' and not 'that a way'. The particular modules which make him feel happy when he stomps face have gotten selected because they limit the amount of males in his area. GI JOE doesn't know this about himself or his modules; He simply, "knows" (is compelled to feel) that those other dudes `suck ass.
Now given the species we come from so far --not what we are becoming now-- the female human's desire to stomp face of other is not there so as to limit the amount of males in her vicinity. It is there to make it harder for the surviving males (on her side) of the face stomping hoedown to get twat. Shit test.
If Mankind continues to become a male-less hive (and it will --even after this little fall a comin') then the females will diversify --specialize--into different roles. Like the female-only caste of a hive. Then yes that hive's female-warrior-specialist-compulsion (to stomp face and see others as "suck asses") can be said to be something other than shit test impulse.
Do you understand CAVE WOMAN?
=====================
I don't quote others; others quote me. (And you can quote me.)
____________
============
Cosmic determinism.
Cause and effect domino effects. Nothing mystical.
Domino effects on the scale of hydrogen-cloud(nebulae) collapse (created by some pressure density event [wave]); then stars and their planets; then star ist kaput creating new pressure density events.
Just like with that, there is cause and effect on the planets too. It gets a little more complicated to say the least but it still is simple determinism. Just like the star birth cause and effect --"cosmic determinism".
====================
Dimorphic sex for vertebrates and how understanding that is relevant to 'our' cause...
The point is to keep her stunted.
There is no reason to allow here to mature: she will just masculinize and make trouble for men. Especially make trouble for men who are specifically stunted by modern peace goals. (Peace goals are created by men as their attempted solution to the culling matches female sexual value naturally instigates.) These peace goals between the males cause the males to be bred/culled and trained to be gits so as to make them less threatening to each other.
The females if allowed to mature are _naturally_ triggered into dominance attempts--and other behaviors hurtful to the men of the 'peace bred society'--by the display the 'peaceful' males exhibit.
The more sappy the society makes males the more sappy and stunted the females have to be in order to still be the females.
A little analogy to help the dense understand... If we turn our grizzly bear species into a panda bear species, we have to make sure and make the females into pandas too. If not, the grizzly females--normally dominated by and triggered into submission to the male grizzlies-- will make mince meat out of the panda males.
Note that our society is about to collapse specifically because of a stated and unstated goal to stop "uppity" females. If the liberal males of the last few centuries would have simply stunted the females too along with trying to forge the new peaceful man, their liberal society might have worked. But by not stunting the females --and indeed allowing and prompting female aggression (which is the inevitable side effect of too many git males in her presence)-- they damned their society at its inception.
Most of you are too stupid --for genetic reasons-- to get this simple, simple stuff. Unfortunately.
All our "opinions" about this are not equal (regardless of what your mother tells you). I understand more about the root fundamentals than most. (The fact you all didn't learn these fundamentals for yourselves as you grew is note worthy and a grand indictment of the "age of reason".) As such I see the way it all works in practice better.
----------------------
The other aspect of dim sex and how it is relevant to our struggle is fem sex value...
Females are "more valuable". This is why males are better at everything: Sperm egg ratio is such that a bottle necks forms around the egg. The males battle through this bottle neck; selection only allows some males through thus making them 'better'.
Either male vs male direct aggression is the culling force [eg bears or lion etc] or female choice is the culling force [eg flying birds, insects, some fish etc].
That is fact of Universe.
If you don't like the way that fact is spun at academia or media then you don't advocate suppression of this fact. You advocate murder of the git males (elimination of their bio chemistries) who create the fem empowerment spin.
Killing those git males is ultimately part of your/my reproductive strategy for getting through that bottleneck. As the git's spin of nature _used as deference payment to female vanity_ is their strategy for getting through that bottleneck. Since the gits are cowards and runts, deference to female caprice is their only hope of winning reproduction.
Note that you and I --we-- are trying to reinstate the bear or lion form of culling. While the gits in charge of this modern upside world are trying to more fully cement in their bird strategy for culling "us" bears/lions out of the way... as we all spiral towards the egg through the bottle neck.
"Either male vs male direct aggression is the culling force [eg bears or lion etc] or female choice is the culling force [eg flying birds, insects, some fish etc]."
Either way, females are "more valuable".
This is a great irony of dimorphic sexuality since dim sex originates(for proto vertebrates) as an emasculation attack by the mature hermaphrodite (male) directed at a younger hermaphrodite (female). The irony is the victors through their victory (ie creating females) actually made things tougher on themselves since males do have tougher lives (whether in male combat species [bears/lions] or female-as-chooser species [birds, insects]).
But yes, the females are still emasculated stunted males by nature*. That's what you want to hear. You are looking for an empowerment argument from nature; same as liberals. Liberals just have to pound square pegs into round holes and then censor the challenges to the illogic. (*female as stunted creature by nature is massively suppressed fact of our evolution _by all sides._)
Liberals hype up the fem sex value aspect of dim sex; And also the specifically female choice dynamics [eg birds, insects etc] and extrapolate to all nature and use as an "argument ad naturalism" to vindicate the modern western female-as-chooser bird-like dynamic [which gits need --it's their only possible chance]; Meanwhile conservatives try to hype up the male vigor aspects of the male as warrior dynamics (bears, lions). Conservatives are hamstrung in their empowerment attempt by their allies in the anti nature creationist and fuddy duddy "moralist"(effete) community. (Moralist fuddy duddies are the bird-like gits that vectored us into this female-as-chooser dynamic in the first place.)
==============
A good example of the absurdity that comes from spinning biology into "nature as female empowerment display" is "females come before males".
Nonsense. A-sexual organisms come first; then hermaphrodites; then dim sex. One can not have "females" or "males" without the other--absurd. (Dim Sex formed a couple separate times through parallelism.)
They concoct the 'fems come first' absurdity from the fact that A-sexual organisms have parts that later become female parts.
"Female lions pick mates." They observed females go to new brunette stuffed males more than new blond/red males. Fine. But how blinded by political "relativism" does one need to be to not see male lions KILLING EACH OTHER IN WARS complete with coalition flanking and diversionary maneuvering!!? (Panzer Battalion strikes again! [It's actually Pz Abteilung.])
Same with the elephant "matriarchy". Nonsense. Male elephants fight to the death and the winner male fucks his choice at his leisure. It is like claiming that a harem parlor --filled with lounging dames-- is a matriarchy cause sometimes Sultan isn't in there. _How blinded with bigotry does one have to be to not see a giant --no, a JUMBO-- male elephant in must?_
(That is a main reason I ignore this "matriarchy/ patriarchy" blabber. It is all ill defined just so tales.)
A specifically human example of the absurdity that comes from trying to spin everything bio science into pro female display is "female open callosum" brain is better than male human single hemisphere brain". ...Pigs, deers, horses, crocodiles etc all have open callosum brains. The male human has the single hemi focused brain and only the male human has left Erda. Coincidence?
Not to mention liberals are shameless hypocrites: One minute it is "we are all the same and biology isn't real"; the next it is "biology is real and females are better --even if we gotta pound square pegs into round holes and shamelessly censor --and excommunicate those 'in league with the devil'-- to make it so".
There are tons of socio anthro babble [not really biology per se] matriarchy /patriarchy fem empowerment absurdities. (List some yourselves.)
We are definitely in a dark age when it comes to bio science -- and especially gender bio science. You conservatives--most especially Americans-- played your part in building that by being stubborn gits who couldn't(and still can't) get certain stuff. Liberals exploited accordingly until their citadel like control was complete. Now we are in a dark age.
-----------------------
FYI, Erda is an old Norse goddess; it is our modern word Earth.
I meant men have built all this crap, including stuff _that leaves Earth_ --even though "handicapped" by only having half a brain. (poor dears) :roll: Meanwhile the mighty wimmins/mouse/crocodile open brain has... um has... Now give me a second and I'll come up with something.
Ah got it: gossiped about ass.
=========
Dame wrote: "I thought China and Asian cultures in general have always favored boys, culturally speaking."
That is a complexity issue that people always point to as another example of how non natural humans are --how above reality itself we are.
While I don't have it figured out entirely it is something like this...
The fathers (and his top sons) are achieving and holding rank so that they can be as reproductively valuable as the females. (Note females do nothing but just show up and be healthy to be as valuable.) The way _those_ fathers hold rank is by having lots of mules that work and fight on behalf of him (and his number one son(s)) and the land needed to sustain that continuum. Those main 'top dog' genes are the main things making it through the bottle neck of fem sex value; the extra sons are a type of husk around the kernels.
This question and concern of your's is more valid than a dame's last one about "self awareness"/ Why creatures are motivated to do what they do. (I explained that one. She was simply wrong there because wimmins are "too close" in their thinking; they lack big picture objectivity.) This 'I want sons' thing is a more important thing you have brought up.
There are other similar examples like that too. Wife immolation(healthy fem killed and buried with high rank man); dowry paid to boys family.
Like I said I don't have this all figured out yet. But the dim sex premise I explained earlier is still valid and accurate. This "I am compelled to want sons" [compulsions are created by chemical modules] is simply a "god of the gaps" issue. ("God of the gaps" = a profundity that hasn't been figured out which doubters use to throw a monkey wrench into the premise.) It is a complexity issue that doesn't negate the premise; it just muddies it.
Also the whole thing might be spandrels. A trait that is just going along for the ride --like ornaments on a cathedral.
(More later if I think of a better, smoother way of explaining this. Good shot dopey girl!)
(Just FYI note "culture" is some kind of expression of underlying natural reality.)
===============
Self awareness and compulsions...
Males aspire because they have compulsions to achieve. (A compulsion is created by chemical chain reactions.) These specific compulsions have been selected more often than other compulsions, from the litter of extended siblings, given the energy conservation principle[finite food] and specifically female sexual value(bottle neck growing from the sperm to egg ratio).
Female humans aspire because they have compulsions to make it harder for males to just get "some" easily; "shit test". These compulsions have been selected once again by energy conversion/conservation BUT specifically... creating chaos and boundaries around reproductions is making her children (ie her compulsions /chemical conversion trends) more effective in some way. (Simply, it is inducing competition and then having that chaos separate the men from the boys.)
(Chemical chain reactions vary. Only some will be selected as efficient at converting more finite food into more of that chain reaction assembly line. The deemed-efficient is selected by an unwitting varying environment.)
To put it even more simply. A male aspires to rock stardom so he can get a chick to become a weak kneed dick sucker. A female aspires to rock stardom so her knees won't just become weak when a male rock star points at his package.
But to say people join up for "honor" or "protection" reasons...
...A red mud tribe(ocher in hair) was asked why they were at war with the blue mud tribe(wode in hair) [they both descend from the white lime in hair culture earlier --blue tribe finding itself by a part of a river bank where wode was exposed, and red tribe finding itself by some other bank of the river where ocher was exposed]. A rud mudder says "Well duh, just look at them... They have blue mud in their hair".
Deeper analysis is not something a joiner has a compulsion towards.
I put that little bit above about the tribes not really knowing what they were fighting for other than their collective feeling that the other tribe sucked ass so as to try to grapple with something. It was meant to be poetic.
Once there was a whale watching boat. College girls on it and a man. (Lets call that man Sean.)
So the whales jump out of the water and smash back down on to the water. Sean says, "do you know why they do that? Only boy whales do it."
...Confused silence.
Sean continues, "it is reproductive display scaring other males away using the conductivity of water to convey size and strength."
The girls, basically in unison, go "Nuh uh. It probably just feels good." [And the 'nays' have it. ...Gotta love democracy.]
Well of course it feels good. But good feelings are compulsions created by bio chemical modules. Out of all the bio chemical modules that formed (rolling around on the ocean floor, pissing in your own face, standing upside down in a volcano plume) --all of which feel good to the doer-- that "jumping out of the water makes me feel good" module did best; ie was 'selected' by the complex unwitting environment more often.
I --er uh Sean-- stated why that module got selected ("scared other males away") but Sean didn't say the whale knew this about his motivation. It simply felt good to him. Sean didn't think that he had to break it down to CAVEMAN BRAIN level for the um "feminine mind" of the world to get it.
Male Lions' midnight belly-grunt festival is the same as the whale jump: an impulse that feels good to the doer but it got unwittingly selected for "intimidation display" reasons (it scared younger smaller male(s) away).
To understand how unwitting selection of modules works, think leopard spots (a cutaneous system bio chemical module). Out of all the other kitten variations, the module that coincidentally unwittingly [since it is just some protein polymers in a goop] created a pattern that mimic'd dappled sunlight did best for reasons unknown to the victorious over-the-other-kittens leopard him/her self.
We then as humans from an outside looking in perspective figure out why that particular cutaneous module did best. We say: stalk pounce ambush predator [as opposed to run the prey down predator] benefits from having camouflage; the camo could mimic some environment feature (or be pattern diffusion/confusion like Zebras or WWI battleships). Eg dappled sunlight coming thru trees.
Same with orgasm module. Same with any other module that has benefited the host it makes up. The modules don't --and the host itself doesn't-- need to know it is the most efficient energy converting trait in an amoral energy based universe for it to "win". It simply "wins" for reasons that go over its "head".
Now back to pussy (the be all end all of our little corner of the universe here)...
Avril Lavign (or who ever) aspires because it feels good. But by doing so she limits (even further) the amount of boys who are eligible breeding stock. Shit test. Avril Lavign doesn't need to know this about the module that compels "aspiring".
GI Joe aspires because it feels good to him. Ie he has modules which compel 'this a way' and not 'that a way'. The particular modules which make him feel happy when he stomps face have gotten selected because they limit the amount of males in his area. GI JOE doesn't know this about himself or his modules; He simply, "knows" (is compelled to feel) that those other dudes `suck ass.
Now given the species we come from so far --not what we are becoming now-- the female human's desire to stomp face of other is not there so as to limit the amount of males in her vicinity. It is there to make it harder for the surviving males (on her side) of the face stomping hoedown to get twat. Shit test.
If Mankind continues to become a male-less hive (and it will --even after this little fall a comin') then the females will diversify --specialize--into different roles. Like the female-only caste of a hive. Then yes that hive's female-warrior-specialist-compulsion (to stomp face and see others as "suck asses") can be said to be something other than shit test impulse.
Do you understand CAVE WOMAN?
=====================
I don't quote others; others quote me. (And you can quote me.)
Some solutions and observations
Luxuriating in the afterglow...
-----------
I believe Western culture needs to eliminate the bad blood/breeds that created the problems (we are suffering under). This probably entails civil war.
Killing cockroaches is not sociopathy. ...Unless one is a cockroach.
I believe in owning the female.
I believe in disciplining the female.
I believe she is not equal intellectually or physically or morally (with anyone but the cockroaches).
None of the above is "sociopathy".
But conforming to feminist edicts and calling break-away from them 'sociopathy' is typical conservative conformist cowardice. This is exactly what liberalism time immemorial relies on to impose its snowballing revolution, generation after generation through all history.
Also your contention that [evil doers] will be put on a big bad "List" by the scary government is silly.
Big deal: I'm on a list now.
I like helicopters. The last ones were delicious.
You change a system by putting stress on it.
That takes courage.
Cowardice is for slaves.
-----------------
Laws are arbitrary ever changing constructs.
Eg this notion that young girls are off limits is a new law --created by men's enemies (the real sociopaths).
It needs to be changed.
Saying that is not sociopathy. But conforming to some law is cowardice. The very cowardice that is the root of feminism in the first place.
-----------------
The 'good pastor' is trying to stop feminism by attempting to evidence how it is bad for females.
"Equality is bad for females --they might pull a muscle!"
Good! I hope they do; their babymakers too. Yep.
I ain't give no fuck if female 'empowahment hurts females.
Even if paternalism/fem protectionism worked at stopping this phase of feminism, the situation created would be the perfect condition for feminism to start up again anew even more virulently.
===============
The problem is getting back there [an acceptable to 'me' cultural dynamic] and staying there forever. Note that we came from such a dynamic but snowballed out of it to this disaster.
The reason we snowballed out of that to the breed we've become now is the "alpha beta gamma" --coup d ta-- cycle of human (and proto human) history and pre history.
To thwart the coup d ta that destroys that cultural dynamic, all dudes need to be the same. Either through strict culling or bio tech making them the same.
=================
Why didn't telling the state to "go stuff it" work back when men were still in charge of the family and quasi self sufficient hunters and such?
Feminism happened because of cosmic determinism. Snowballs.
Understanding that allows us to --possibly-- make the current/snowball go where we want it to. And that would be determinism too.
---------
The state is not an enemy. This state is. This state came into being because men embraced the bizarre mentally ill fantasy that a world with out a state was/is possible.
+++++++++++++++++
=================
If there was any evidence that an actual company paid a wimmins less, Gloria Allred types would be all over it along with the media, and the Equal.O.C-type unconstitutional wimmins' government bureaus.
The 77 cents on the dollar means all men at large have generated more than all wimmins at large. But it is presented as though some chick at an interview was paid less than a man.
Not to mention the stat itself was debunked as a fem stat coming from some college dept that couldn't vindicate the stat itself. Just like with the DV and rape stats. Once challenged, there is no source for the stat but it grows legs and that becomes the stat. Note the 77 cents changes every year and depending on speech it could be as low as 75 to 70 cents; hell sometimes they'll be a decimal tail on it LOL.
When one actually studies the given thing that feminism complains about, he'll find that the females are actually advantaged in the given situation that the trumped up femstat complained about. Eg the military: only 25 % fem officers. Horrible! Until one considers that only 14% of military is female. Same with hospitals: more wimmins die in them you see ...cause men don't go there at all; and fewer wimmins used as _guinea pigs_ by new pharmaceuticals --the outrage!. Well it's the same with this money thing: the females are actually over advantaged by corporations and Human Resources than the men for less real work generated.
And none of that even begins to address the more important underlying and surrounding issue which is "fem sex value" and male competition over it. The only reason people work and have "positions" in the first place.
-----------
I believe Western culture needs to eliminate the bad blood/breeds that created the problems (we are suffering under). This probably entails civil war.
Killing cockroaches is not sociopathy. ...Unless one is a cockroach.
I believe in owning the female.
I believe in disciplining the female.
I believe she is not equal intellectually or physically or morally (with anyone but the cockroaches).
None of the above is "sociopathy".
But conforming to feminist edicts and calling break-away from them 'sociopathy' is typical conservative conformist cowardice. This is exactly what liberalism time immemorial relies on to impose its snowballing revolution, generation after generation through all history.
Also your contention that [evil doers] will be put on a big bad "List" by the scary government is silly.
Big deal: I'm on a list now.
I like helicopters. The last ones were delicious.
You change a system by putting stress on it.
That takes courage.
Cowardice is for slaves.
-----------------
Laws are arbitrary ever changing constructs.
Eg this notion that young girls are off limits is a new law --created by men's enemies (the real sociopaths).
It needs to be changed.
Saying that is not sociopathy. But conforming to some law is cowardice. The very cowardice that is the root of feminism in the first place.
-----------------
The 'good pastor' is trying to stop feminism by attempting to evidence how it is bad for females.
"Equality is bad for females --they might pull a muscle!"
Good! I hope they do; their babymakers too. Yep.
I ain't give no fuck if female 'empowahment hurts females.
Even if paternalism/fem protectionism worked at stopping this phase of feminism, the situation created would be the perfect condition for feminism to start up again anew even more virulently.
===============
The problem is getting back there [an acceptable to 'me' cultural dynamic] and staying there forever. Note that we came from such a dynamic but snowballed out of it to this disaster.
The reason we snowballed out of that to the breed we've become now is the "alpha beta gamma" --coup d ta-- cycle of human (and proto human) history and pre history.
To thwart the coup d ta that destroys that cultural dynamic, all dudes need to be the same. Either through strict culling or bio tech making them the same.
=================
Why didn't telling the state to "go stuff it" work back when men were still in charge of the family and quasi self sufficient hunters and such?
Feminism happened because of cosmic determinism. Snowballs.
Understanding that allows us to --possibly-- make the current/snowball go where we want it to. And that would be determinism too.
---------
The state is not an enemy. This state is. This state came into being because men embraced the bizarre mentally ill fantasy that a world with out a state was/is possible.
+++++++++++++++++
=================
If there was any evidence that an actual company paid a wimmins less, Gloria Allred types would be all over it along with the media, and the Equal.O.C-type unconstitutional wimmins' government bureaus.
The 77 cents on the dollar means all men at large have generated more than all wimmins at large. But it is presented as though some chick at an interview was paid less than a man.
Not to mention the stat itself was debunked as a fem stat coming from some college dept that couldn't vindicate the stat itself. Just like with the DV and rape stats. Once challenged, there is no source for the stat but it grows legs and that becomes the stat. Note the 77 cents changes every year and depending on speech it could be as low as 75 to 70 cents; hell sometimes they'll be a decimal tail on it LOL.
When one actually studies the given thing that feminism complains about, he'll find that the females are actually advantaged in the given situation that the trumped up femstat complained about. Eg the military: only 25 % fem officers. Horrible! Until one considers that only 14% of military is female. Same with hospitals: more wimmins die in them you see ...cause men don't go there at all; and fewer wimmins used as _guinea pigs_ by new pharmaceuticals --the outrage!. Well it's the same with this money thing: the females are actually over advantaged by corporations and Human Resources than the men for less real work generated.
And none of that even begins to address the more important underlying and surrounding issue which is "fem sex value" and male competition over it. The only reason people work and have "positions" in the first place.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
