Finale, Solutions

Finale, Solutions
(Just a sketch)

Stopping fem is two fold.

How to stop the system we have now and what system to create that prevents these problems in the future. By solving the 2nd problem first, it gives us the rally cry means to solve the first one, since the masses don't jump out of the frying pan until they know there is something other than fire beyond.

2) How to prevent fem forever. Preventing fem forever entails understanding how fem happened...

We keep alive too many weak males for the last few centuries/millenia. Feminism is a trick the runt males use to box out the better males. This emboldens females.

-----
I advocate and recommend stopping pro fem breed and belief --in all of its manifestations and prerequisite-antecedents-- for all times and always-- through _any_means_ necessary.

Note that there is no such thing as equal: Equal is rally cry (and solution attempt) of battles passed; it is long since exposed as balder dash.

BS --like “hope” and the rest of the altruism largess apparatus-- is ultimately simply tactical on the part of the speaker since the utopia espoused can't happen but replacing others with _your_ greed & need can.

I understand freedom is a bloody word. Most people don't have the stomach for it. At _best_ they can fight every once and a while to try to free themselves from some acute enslavement. But they don't have the courage or brains/foresight to see the larger causes that lead to each liberation revolution always falling short. Therefore they don't have the whatever to nip the problems in the bud. Non the less long term solution are needed --a big picture rassion d tre.

All the talk about protecting inferiors and all. That's what unraveled the west originally.

================

Solving The Human Condition Woes:

.Testing and sterilization of the stupid and cruel (start by testing before voting);

.Make everyone the same in childhood (but 'up' rather than 'down' sameness) --since most politics is unwitting reactionarism /venting from kidhood;

._Control of female hypergamy instinct_ through any means. (Men shouldn't be squeamish here; men "anthropomorphize" females more than they deserve.)

=======================

The anglo colonial idea (america et al) of running away to the hinterland as a way of getting away from the hive and its blabbering hypocrisy is a dead end. That hinterland solution has been said all along before; It is the exploration age and colonial ethos. It didn’t work the first time.

...Gamble that civi self destructs through all the worker bees it forces into John Galt status.

How many more generations, runaway, can last un ‘absorbed’ in the outback? _Especially relevant question, since all --pertinently the females-- know how to use a phone now._

I think the fight is in the cities etc. Control of media and military [catch 22 there].

Convince soldiers, mano e mano, that they fight for the wrong side --ie their enemies-- as duped Useful Idiots; seize media; convince the rest. Note, soldiers are very thick though; La Machine likes it that way (Natural Selection doing its thing, selecting for conformist simple minded warrior drones).

Then once victory achieved, a strong _government_ created so as to prevent the problems of liberalism from ever rearing up again. (Ie get that whole “government is a bad word” thing out of your skulls; and you don’t need a “tax break” either, you dupes.)

If man makes it to an ‘undiscovered continent’ (eg space platforms), then varying social models will spring again, including MicroCommunities.

Once there, I’d recommend for the MicroCommunities A) being very isolated; and B) grappling with, so far un analyzed, gender (ie the females), child rearing and rank and caste issues among the male monkeys. Be aware that controlling gender and status issues --ie creating contentment-- will stifle “growth"/change. ...Thus allowing the more vibrant and hungry effete hives to find and absorb the MicroComms --unless MicroC are well out of reach. Natural Selection will do its thing.

=======================

The only long term solution to stopping the endless cycle of coup d eta which unraveled mankind is one-male-per-territory land owners; every male gets a plot and owned female(s). Think contented gorillas as opposed to revolutionary chimps. Use techno (genetic etc) to make everyone the same (and females compliant).

Space travel gives us raisson d tre rally point (something to do, rather than ‘invading slavia’ again or etc). And it creates room and another go/turn to try the scheme.

But first "Protectionism".

Abolish capitalism as a way of opposing liberalism, since they are more symbiotic than kidney failure and dialysis. Capitalism and democracy = doom, just like the jesus thing wound up equaling.

Once power is garnered (through protectionist BigTent triangulations), replace military, media, lawyers and academics too.

Then policy... Policies of eugenics and antifeminism; and space colonization. (Eugenics and anti fem achieved through soapbox economic protectionism.)

Long term...

Control breeding and rearing:

Male only land owners; one son only, who then passes baton to his one son on his own part of the large land plot, cyclically (two corners of a plot, back and forth over the generations). (Immortality techno might obsolete that.) Trespass is mortal crime; zero sexual mobility for females (ankle monitoring, etc possibly). Use Interwebs to link all male landowners who can remain individuals yet be plugged into, as neurons, a giant brain collective. Ie. Civilization yet still rural --'Ideal Mankind' [Himmler, Jefferson... and Mendelssohn too]. Teach the generations over same network.

Spread to orbit then beyond.

Out of the trees and off our knees.

Out of the larval cocoon.

(...But you are naughty children who will do it your own way. Enter our history as femdom Borg... who bring us to the same celestial destiny anyway.)

=================

1)How to stop it acutely/how to topple this regime? (People will say "hey that's a terrorist threat". No, it is a terrorist promise...)

Some media control then military coup then instantaneous media/law and elite putsches. More consciousness-raising first; Need better challenges to fem boiler plate [DV and stuff].

The fact females are ineffective in combat is a plus not a minus. We want america-- and the rest of the anglo-jew controlled west-- to start losing its wars.

....
Let's end lying to, emotionally abusing* and manipulating men. (*including but not limited to secret telling and gossip)

Let's end mothers abusing their children. (And I ain't talking about abortion.)

Let's end lesbian partner violence.
....

====================
>
“What do you propose for a solution [to single fem parent]? Forced marriage / re-marriage of single parents?”
>

Um...

1 Preventing them [wimmins] from breeding (through reversible sterilization) until claimed by passable adult male [see below 3b] then preventing them from divorcing?

2 Take away lone female social and economic "rights". ('Rights' is a made up term by con artists; those such as yourself. I don't actually acknowledge the term.)

3 Testing and sterilization before hand.

3b Elimination of under males/ replacing them with work machines (or 3c getting rid of 'low' males and then letting civilization die in favor of... "the matriarchy of the tribal past" LOL). [FYI, We do not come from matriarchies; indeed the whole concept of patriarchy and matriarchy is ever shift-able just so tale.]

4 Replacing of females with artificial womb technology (including conscripting other mammals [headless] (though I personally like animals too much), until full artificial wombs can be fabricated). [We could conscript altered human females so, actually.]

4b "Medicating or treating"(surgically) female humans to be more compliant "citizens".

Just a few solutions off the top of my head. Shall I go on?...


Oh BTW, jesus saves and when do I get my tax break?

I mean that's what it's all about right? Your type says whatever kind of protectionist utopian BS you want --literally ignoring your betters who have thought "utopia" all through already-- and then the the half brained, dog on leash Useful-Idiot 'conservatives' respond "tax break" or "but what about the lord?" Then every once and while your class lets them off the leash to go bite your enemies.

=============

If you’re concerned about race issues, form up with the Russians. It should’ve gone down like that in the mid 20th cent --instead of that disaster. Note the Slavs are a little meaner/more masculine than the Brits, though.

=============

As for race and feminism...

females need to be massively disenfranchised. Permanently.

Then internal human reproduction needs to be replaced with ‘external womb incubators’. (Not simply to allow abortion to be more easily outlawed (death to jebus cult).) External wombs will allow _consistently controlled_, _always pre-planned human procreation_ to occur. Also cloning techno and genetic health and disease techno needs to be mastered.

Either liberalism --which is a female trend-- will be nullified and therefore race replacement will stop. OR “race replacement” will occur and then the Euro-sphere females will get what they have coming.

...A new chimera breed will form from the enslaved loins of the remaining Euro females.

Either way the human female will be segregated from political life.

A grand cosmic irony befitting the make-believe Great Savant in the Sky.

As the wind laughs…

====================================
Eugenics

Smart people self sterilize all the time. It’s called thinking it through. The dumb can’t think it through so they should be forced to make the right decision (the decision to breed slowly and carefully).

Pain and suffering will be the norm in a race of idiots. Even if it is not ‘thought’ about.

Remember, either way “genics” happens. It is just a question of which strains will thrive --and whether these strains will be called “Eu-” or "Dys-”. (Note 'eu' or 'dys' are relative constructs.)

It gets even more complicated than that unfortunately; eg “heredity” etc. But the premise is super sound.

Meaning... er um... dog breeds [b]do[/b] form through selecting of characters from the litter BUT it isn't always a `straight line, given the 'profundities' of 'he's got grandma's nose and great grandpa's ears'.

(Few of those 'profundities' --from the 19th and 20th century explosion of epiphanies-- have trickled down and been imbibed properly because of the [i]political problems[/i]--problems in part created by the propaganda crusade to rally dopey johnny and his holy babble].)

But the premise of selective breeding always happening _whether we "take the bull by the horns" or not_ is super sound. [`T'is.]

And this 'taking the bull by the horns' is not synonymous with 'invading Slavia and engaging in "Draconian anti saboteur policy" [as retreating in dire straights occurs]; nor is it synonymous with inviting sanctimonious, hypocritical carpet bombing.

Most don't characterize eugenics any where near correct. ...Strawmen wherein the word 'eugenics' means German late war (WWII) slaughter --allied induced or scorched earth Goeterdaammerung.

If the dumb whites ascending in recent centuries are not sterilized, the “race” will die through the weight of their ill thinking majority muscle anyway.

This isn’t that complicated either.

============

Anti eugenicists would do better to say "techno can make everybody fit into a 'good stock' template without the sterilizing of 'undesirables' [since the [gene/medical] tech will eliminate the undesirables `at the gate through its advances]."

Yeah well so long as the stupid and the frontmen profiteer shysters (which the polite call lawmakers etc and capitalists etc) are in charge (not to mention the jew/media) chances of the gene/medical techno snowball being used for "good" are slim.

Like most things that have gripped white maledom, it's a catch 22... If we could only get rid of the giant peter-principle [mediocres failing upwards] structure of Lilliput, we'd be in a perfect position to... get rid of the giant peter-principle structure of Lilliput.

Also, allowing other types --_who have grievances with the intelligent, healthy white male host_-- to be "upgraded" to "our" aptitude is potentially shortsightedly dangerous.


Nurture is very real. And it's still all biodeterminism, since it's all bio chemistry. A petry dish doesn't recognize nature nurture sophistry.

To understand nature nurture, look at allergies. Two [b]different[/b] types walk through a hay field; one gets the sniffles and the other doesn't. It is genetics. Now take that one that does get the sniffles... If he never comes across hay, he will never get the sniffles. It is nurture/environment. (Hay is just an analog here--it can apply to lotsa scenarios.)

Also "lead in the water" changes someone's nervous system and therefore creates different end results. "Lead" is just one example of how monogenerational contingency effects bio-chemistry of individual.

Liberals take these facts and use them unscrupulously and hypocritically (just like the fact of right /wrong, and good /bad being relative constructs). Often jews, yes.


(By the way, regarding testing and eugenics, females are the 'carriers' of most social disease; the sons who are patho/ violent, bums, the weird etc are the expression of that disease. 'Female sexual value' --or more properly the instinct it has unwittingly bred for in ever competing males-- causes many/most to not see that.)


There is no ‘gene’ for things per se. “Gene” is a glib way of stating a premise.

There ARE differences in the tissues and etc bio chemistry between individuals; there are differences in perception, problem solving and prediction ability between individuals; the biochemistries are the roots of the different perception, problem solving and prediction abilities.

Genes turn food("energy") into those tissues and biochemistries. Genes express differently depending on which genes they have wound up near on the genome.

Environmental effects --acting like sideswipes / blind-sidings" on the food converting processes-- just further complexify the premise.

_________________________________________
====================================
Free Range pussy and 'Pick Up Artist' "Game" Culture


Females should be regulated. Free range pussy is as ridiculous as cattle randomly walking down the street.

Once men figured out how to domesticate food (a'la Steve Martin's caveman bit on SNL), the whole world radically changed.

We need such a revolution when it comes to these ill mannered, self centered discriminatory children (er um "females" I believe is the polite term) that the neo cortex must use for reproduction.

Down with 'free range pussy' setting terms for everyone. Regulate the female.

_"Down with Free Range pussy."_

Until then...

'Game' simply means, girls (like all people) are automatonic: when a stick is thrown they WILL CHASE IT.

The Christians and the liberals hate this, for it exposes their polite fictions which hold together this caste structure of runts as absurdity. Game pisses off all the right people and that's good.

It is very similar to the girl culture of gossip and legion 'wimmins magazines', where in females share tips about how to exploit men's most vulnerable needs for fun and profit.

That is why female et al outrage over 'game' is so... typical (hypocrisy). It is similar to the hypocritical outrage over "rock star and groupie culture": ...An arrogant-peacock man having rockstar leverage over people who are gaga needy and using them for fun is heinous, heinous, heinous and not very nice... unless you're an average or better (and talentless) teenage
girl doing it to her suitors and then it is a solemn right...

'Game' is "science"/Darwinism/anthropology/sociology/"socio-biology/evolutionary psychology/"HBD"** put into living practice --ignoring, _conspicuously,_ the sophistry based debates(looped in circles) that demand those subjects remain relegated to just theoretica.

You my dear are the object.

Fetch.

(_"science"/Darwinism/anthropology/sociology/"socio-biology/evolutionary psychology/"HBD"**_ **The reason the subject keeps changing its title is because the 'human sciences' are scary and controversial. The demagogues who ostensibly represent/parasite off of the scared masses come in with swords drawn to make the facts go away (and control the 'ceiling painting' implications of them). Ultimately the badly outnumbered intellects "abandon the field" to the sophists and protectionist demagogues. These intellects then set up shop somewhere else under a different name... until the "liberals" catch on and deploy their attack again...)

=============

For now porno is necessary to free males from the male and female created female sex-cartel.

But in the long run the boys are being exploited by pimps of various types (females or otherwise). That is the reason that AFTER the "revolution" porno will be controlled. _But NOT in the name of protecting females._

If and when the boys and men have access to sex when they want, porno won't be desired anymore for that reason.


==========

Others are right when they say "80% of dames doing 20% of dudes". This is the key thing. And yes it is the core of all 'inequality', discrimination, competition, health, caste and oppression. It is Not easy to solve though --especially when our society is born and bred full of dunces who can't begin to contemplate on that philosophical plane for genetic reasons. (That's why I say death to democracy.)

______________________________________________________________
=======================================================

Little Bo Pee Pee...


As the male human becomes more and more infantile (which is the side effect of men's coup d eta snowball of pulling down the dominant males and the primitive /robust way of life in general [which is the cause of "feminism"]), he is going to have to find a way to either stunt the females under his level of infantilism/sappiness or simply get rid of/purge the highest /most masculine/ most "self aware" females (who use to be kept in line by the long ousted dominant males).

If he doesn't, the praying mantis/black widow male-redundancy principle will trigger. Note that ubiquitous though conspicuously ignored "femdom" is that snowball getting rolling.

He can achieve this stunting of the females through... Promethean bio tech solutions or complicated biology shapings /personality shapings that come from complicated not understood socialization phenom (simply "nurture syndromes").

People don't get this stuff because the ascendant males of the runt-ocracy western man breeds for simply lack something important.

I challenge this notion that seeing a dick squirt a few years early "damages" a female. She is a _female_ for christ sake! --she's supposed to be "damaged" in that way. (If males can't accept that then 1 they can cut their dicks off (basically the modern agenda) and 2 not make any female children.)

Boys raised in single fem households --even if their is no sex involved-- are way, way more dysfunctional –unable to grow and “fledge” [like birds from a nest] “throw down” etc (self discipline, ambition/indolence etc)-- than a female who did 'it' with uncle.

Boinking/marrying a niece (and disciplining her too!) use to be totally normal for most until a few generations ago (it still is for much of the species). Stunting them – or the more popular way of saying it now "abusing their forming libidos" and “DV”-- is what makes a female stay female bio deterministically: if she keeps growing shes hits a type of maleness (or at least leverage).

Males don't want other males having easy access to sex so they look for any excuse to hamstring other males; they also display protector /mule abilities to females.

...Men discover a female who has been boinked young and then tell her she is "harmed" in some way as they get the blanky out and hot cocoa for her and tuck her feeties in (making a victim in the process) –calling out loudly a drag-net for the “offender” with finger in air and hand to their breast. And other older females will tell her she is damaged too, motivated by their understanding that she probably “lost” the “whose in charge” “eye contact” part of the encounter and motivated by their desire to use any trick/propaganda to get more deference from men (especially if they are wall flowers with axes to grind).

Note females specialize in “stare down” as toddlers, along with lifting their skirts when introduced to new older males and later walking on tip toes and sleeping with butts in the air. I don't know what that's supposed to mean... I'm just saying.

The boinked females “lost the [pyscho-babble] part of the encounter”. But that's just it-- we want them to “lose” this encounter. That's what undermines their sex cartel. Duh.

--------
On a related note, society invents elaborate canards that strippers and sex workers in general (eg porno) have so called “low body image” --said to be the side effect of uncle-etc boinking. LO freaking L: ...girls show their clams for a living with smirks on their faces to sailors for 2000 dollars a week because they are ashamed of their bodies [sarc]. Yeah, makes total sense. Egads!

I'll explain Sex workers (not junky street walker variety who are legally retarded)... They matured early (in modern america that is a synonym for Italian or other ethnic) and had the “pretty ones”[genitals] at the 11 year old all girl sleep-over pool-party (where girls explore same sex finger banging and the like). Ie they are the girls with _higher_ body image. Duh.
Then our simpering infantile society (jebus cult mixed with liberalism) --thru that simperingness _which emboldens_-- creates avenues for them with the lure of easy money and bad-ass status allure. (Probably false easy money lure: the market is swamped.)

------

Speaking of young gulls and the modern world...

Do 12 year old girls now shave their twats to look more grown up?...

================

How does having sex with the young female harm her?

All the females under 18 or 15 or even 13 who were married off in history were "harmed"?

Whatever harm you believe she incurs, others incur even worse harm in other categories without any sex involved yet society considers those other things "moral"/ not-harmful.

You don't think things through. You only see two domino effects of a 10 domino chain.

It's like Domestic Violence. If society doesn't allow the cheating wife to be "harmed", someone else will be by her untethered folly.

How does letting her escape the "harm" of feminine stunting not harm other people?

You're just making it up. Again, you don't think things through. You only see two domino effects of a 10 domino chain.

BTW, regarding Mylie Cyrus: Desire for Mylie Cyrus is not "pedo", being as she's a teen star. (She is a later blooming sappier redneck-type though. But thats good: we want to keep them there. Duh)

NOTE –and I never do this caps thing-- CONSERVATIVES –LIKE THE MASSES IN GENERAL--ARE DUNCES AND MINDLESSLY CONFORMIST AUTOMATONS AND GULLIBLE MULES WHO COULDN'T GET THEIR WAY OUT OF A WET PAPER BAG.

Tough guy white knights[tm] demonstrate that they believe in violence to make people obey.

So then it is just a question of WHAT people should obey.

For now the simpleminded types have embraced a total lie that the female humans are benign and good, when in truth she is the key to everyone's woe everywhere in all times.

Controlling her is key to all permanent solutions.

I wouldn’t come to the aid of any big mouth female ever.

That is one way to stop them.

So long as dunces –er uh I mean conservative men– continue to _mindlessly_, _instinctively_ defend females, the females will continue to snowball society down the path of more and more liberalism. Ie continue to damage people and society through tantrum.

The females are not sentient enough to understand or care that they are doing that. Like animals they –like most– only understand consequence in real time not potential. Ergo… let them go.

Another type of male is "Princess Spoilers"; they too are a core reason why we have feminism. ...Give the pathological squeaky wheel more and more oil ('or garsh, she'll scree'), while those with fewer mattress between themselves and the pea are told to "suck it up".

If you build bias into the system a minority of the malicious will use it unscrupulously.

=====================

Rape is a made up word. Especially in the Islam or Mormon instance of young female marriage.

This so called Islamic/Mormon “rape” really means not allowing females to charge a price; not allowing them to form a sex cartel; not allowing them to manipulate "Useful Idiot" infantile males into enslaving themselves.

The Mainstream West brainwashes it children to conform to its mores the same as those people "brainwash" theirs.

The Mainstream West has simply conformed to mores --often created by jews-- that trick it into thinking females are "equal" and should be "liberated".

You all --mainstream westerners-- then brainwash your children to those mores: you set up your male children to be "raped" by a system that not only doesn't have their best interests at heart but often outwardly despises them.

================

>
someone said, negatively: “sexual availability at puberty”
>>

Why shouldn’t wimmin be made to remain sexually available?

Men putting endless barriers around females (as their male reproductive strategy for marginalizing other males) is why we have the ambition, greed, political problems (triangulation: immigration, feminism etc) and the psychological /pathology problems, the chaotic economic/ ‘growth’ and environmental problems that we do in western culture.

Islamics and Polynesians and etc indolent cultures are non growth based --ie non environmentally destructive and non chaotic/ non pathologic-- specifically because the males are content…

…given the “sexual availability” of their females.

It is ironic that the west’s sexual revolution and “free love” led to the price of sex going through the roof (thereby exacerbating male competition to generate more for themselves --at others' expense-- so they can buy some acceptance and fidelity from a creature so en-pedestaled that she isn't use to offering any.

I find it fascinating that liberals have no problem advocating “redistribution of wealth” but are blind to the real wealth that biologically underpins and motivates all the other kinds of competition/ wealth acquiring.

Redistribute the real wealth!…

_Control the females_.

Liberals have always been bad at finding the point and that’s why they do so badly at the color in the circle with the number two pencil tests (hence they attack those tests as “arbitrary constructs” of some dark force called patriarchy).

People in western culture are like children that don’t understand what they really advocate. It’s just tantrum and endless political triangulations/ realignments venting failure issues from childhood.

=======================

Females are not equal.

Females need to be mute and stunted; or replaced.


Testing before voting.

Sterilize the dumb.

Abort the dopey (bio chemically diagnosed as such by future tech).


Christianity and democracy must be stopped.

Then Eugenics --ie testing in childhood and sterilization-- must be imposed. (Test(s) should look for intellect, health and sanity. Medical technology can be used to make one better prepared to 'pass' the test(s).)

If not the neo-cortex becomes extinct.

Simple.

===========

Never run.. It makes you look weak, thus leading to more, next time. Fighting back --and even losing-- is better. ...And then a nice speech/statement back at the mic, carpe diem style "[see what we mean? The 'injustice', etc.]".

============

I'm against sperm banks and adoption for anyone no less single fem parents. Children need to be raised by creatures that sense their aptitudes and characters.

.....................................................

Bombe, bombe, bombe per svegliare questi dormiglioni

“Bombs, bombs, bombs to wake up these sluggards"

+++++++++++++

Liberalism is not bad per se (all that vegetarianism and sappy this and sappy that). It is simply wrong: it makes bad decisions rooted in bad beliefs (most of that the fault of congenital shortcomings and complex snowballing implications of that). (Note I personally still pine for the northern “heroic” past (true conservationism), ‘cause I’m a child ‘alpha male’--the past is where I thrived --but it doesn’t ‘work’ or it would have already.)

+++++++++++++
===============
Males need to solve the man vs man problem --that starts in childhood-- that has plagued us time immemorial. Doing that will solve every other issue.

Competitivness _and_ genetic based difference (environmental difference just adds to that problem).

But more to the point "loss".

All politics is the side effect of reactionaryism from childhood.

The plug itself needs to be pulled that leads to the complexities that led to 'feminism'. Ie that led to civilization/jebus gobbly gook(wishful thinking)/democracy/feminism (and anti male marxism [which is jew motivated trick to marginalize host culture males]).

The alpha beta gamma coup d eta cycle has to be stopped itself.

We have the technologies and philosophical understandings now to begin to grapple with this.

One male per territory land owners; owned females --no leaving of land; one son only.

It is either the above or snowballing to femdom borg hive.

Think gorilla-ocray [one adult male per group] replacing chimp ocracy [many males in hierarchy with constant coup d eta].

(Snowballing collateral damage of gorilla-ocracy is trend towards dopey-laziness. Snowballing collaterol damage of chimp trend is democracy/feminism.)

Your choice...

-----------

The long term preventative solution is everybody needs to be made the same (through bio tech or severe heavy duty nurture controls) or we need thick culls each generation in childhood (so as to protect the good seed /children from the coalitions of envious vengeful idiots and weaklings).

How to get to that solution there is more difficult.

---------
I say --paraphrasing the Steve Martin caveman bit from old SNL --'down with free range pussy'.

If that winds up creating dysgenics where too many fool males breed, then we need eugenics to redress that.

We shouldn't just hope that after female liberation and dispersal that the 'best males' will by picked at the 'thumpa thumpa' club.

Alpha Beta Gamma (Omega) Dynamic

The "Alpha Beta Gamma Dynamic" (sometimes called "alpha beta omega" by plagiarizers; but that's okay so long as it spreads):

Underling males --kept alive by human success-- ousted overling males to get some sex. This started a social pattern. Human intelligence was able to see a tactic and repeat it.

This is called the "alpha beta gamma dynamic". Beta males rouse up gamma rabble (getting ever larger because of human success at food and environment control) and use them to oust the alpha (strutting presumptuous peacocks). _Then the beta become the alpha and are in turn ousted by the same tactic snowballing over the generations._

It is that that made white humans as smart as they are. One doesn't need to be [i]this[/i] smart to simply be an apex predator in temperate and cold clim.

Well that political dynamic /sexual tactic kept snowballing until we lost control-over/respect-from the females.

http://seanmaccloud.blogspot.com/2009/10/how-and-why-feminism-happened.html

=============
(Again...)

Alpha are strutting around getting sex.

Beta (a little marginal sexually) conspire with gamma (full marginal, sexually).

Together beta and gamma are able to topple the alpha.

Now --if the critters are smart enough to memorize pattern-- the cycle will continue.

The beta will become the alpha, the top portion of the gamma will become the new beta and will conspire with the gamma to oust the latest alpha.

That coalition-conspiring game is called politics. Chimps do it; dolphins do it; various monkey species do it. Other species form political coalition --as a way of keeping out-group males away from captured females-- but don't have as much internal coup d eta vibe; eg lions(who run the young males['beta' in this instance] off effectively), cheetah males.

I assert --and I'm not alone-- that the AlphBetGam(/Ome) Dynamic snowballed into a runaway train that selected for the super amount of intellect humans have now. It wasn't simply tool use or the cold that selected for the craftiest pups from our litters.

I assert that now that cycle of coup d etas has snowballed and undermined men themselves. Specifically the ABG Snowball made us so infantile (through the snowball of ousting chiefs) that we fell under the most aggressive/masculine females.

This really shouldn't be that confusing or controversial.


^V^V^V^V^V^V^V^
==============


Pro-fem is not suppose to make any sense; it's not trying to.

It is the side effect of the techno snowball (ever piling up antlers of human male competition waged over the hen house) allowing runt males to win the ascendancy battles.

Once the runt males took over the dog pack, the adult females of the pack --the "bitches" (heh)-- were the only pack members left that still had adult-like fangs.

Small and feminine --ie inept and daft-- as these fangs were (and are) they are still the biggest teeth left in the pack, given that the males have seen to their own neutering through their techno-supported battles. With the snowballing power of females in society/ the family --and the profound (not understood by me or anyone else) psychology and hormone shaping implications of that--the males have further become neutered.

All the "politics" and "philosophy" of the last few centuries are just the barking and howling noises at "the kill" as the bitches (the only real adults left in the pack) nip the runt males (the only type of male left in the white human dog-pack) into compliance.

Since these philosophical and political beliefs are just barking and howling noises --the 'grrs' at "the kill"-- it is not surprising these philosophies are self contradicting ONE HUNDRED PERCENT of the time. They're not trying to make any sense.

I don't know why everyone doesn't already know this for themselves.

Oh!... The reason is the neo cortex has _already_ become extinct. The couple of freaks like me are like so many Neanderthal roaming alone in the final days of that breed...

Death to democracy!

=======

IQ, dysgenics, red hair and testosterone (and more)

I basically agree that low 120ish is a great IQ to have in the Euro-sphere in this day and age: smart enough but not maladjusted.

That is why eugenics is so necessary. We need to move the mode to the right on the bell curve chart.

Merit is relative; it has to do with what the arena is. Change the arena and you change what is alpha pup and what is dead runt.

I believe for _Euro Caucasoids_ the chiefs of yore were 135ish; shamans were 140ish (or just 135 add 'lactose intolerance' or etc) and the tribe males were 120ish. (The rest were dead. We keep the dead alive now in a humongous dysgenic serfdom where fancy talk covers up the word "cat herded serfdom".)

Today, the leaders/professionals etc are 120 ish(or less!), the tribe is 100 or worse(!) the 135s are deemed the cosmic enemies of all mankind's history and the 141ish are the runty, ring-kissing, _cowed_ neurons of a giant body no one ever advocated or understands. (Above that set are newly kept alive poor fucks that only survive now because of the new environment (modern civilization).)

This is all easy to investigate --if liberalism (and its tendency to convolute and distort) is quashed:

Test and observe the children (3-11 years old).

Observe natural pecking order issues.

I assert the class leader males will be 135 ish. (Children naturally follow the kid with 'IT'; 'it' according to the old measure of men from which we come and are still an echo of.)

Then follow these kids around for life. I bet those leader males are ousted during puberty in favor of dumber conformity controllers.

(This is true even without non white ethnics dumbing up the soup I assert. Ie this trend starts before their introduction.)

Further, the ousted males don't go on to be the "corporate heads" or political heads or any leaders above board. (They probably are still leaders of their circles --since pack males naturally defer to `cache; or they are loners.)

This ousting-the-born-leaders-and-replacing-with-fools thing is what democracy (and civilization in general) aspires to do by _stated goal_ and design. So if what I'm saying is not happening then democracy is failing at its goal.

---------------
I've already noted that politician-IQ-reports are usually high; absurdly so. They are created by partisans.

We don't hear about anglo western pols' real IQs because they are low (115 to 120 ish?). The "dictators" were much higher I assert. And that doltishness is not a coincidence: it is what democracy is.

Suspected Bell Curve mode avgs for classes:

(I just make everything up... But I'm still right...)

-white masses 102 [a newly kept alive thralldom]
-military and police 110 [pre history early history's tribal warrior mass; now tweaked in their morphologies: namely they are simple-focused, like immune cells are simple-focus amoeba (as dogs are specialized/tamed wolves)]
-politicos and media 115-123 [rabble rousers of the "alpha beta gamma dynamic" (coup d eta chimp system); courtly sycophants of medieval dynasty system]
-CEOs and professionals[lawyers] 120-126 (professionals are high) [just right for the new world order going on centuries now; more courtly vestiges yore]
-comedians 125-130 [hmmm...]
-artists 131-135 [old shamans and chiefs, functioning on charisma and aptitude display]
-scientists 140 [old shamans (and chiefs)]
-poor bastards

----------------------------
IQ tests are not the be all end all. Yes the jews are sophister convoluters and distorters but they do point at truths (that's why they are effective demagogues):

People are like bar graphs of traits. And then there is very _relevant_ Nurture Syndrome (which is real and NOT the same as that B.S. liberal "blank slate").

Nurture Syndrome = like callouses or lead paint, but even more profound and extensive --glandular and neurologic habituation etc.


"Emotional IQ" is jew sophistry. The end result of that "research" as far as I can tell is 'dumb liars make more functional citizens' [and wimmins]. The fact jews don't then go on to deconstruct that by saying "citizenship --like any other measuring stick-- is a relative test which says more about the tester than anything else" even though it is their raison d tre to deconstruct just like that exposes their hypocrisy once again.

All that above there complexifies simple IQ assertions. I say that, even though I am a genius. It is just that I have seen people as smart as me and smarter (@#*! :-) ) not get simple stuff because of their cowardliness or testosterone issues or other bio-soup issues. (Eg bench warmer issues in childhood or physiological cognitive blind spots cause warped lensing.) If we had to pick a simple selection criteria I guess IQ would be best... "Let's just get it over and done with and we'll recon with details about the survivors later".)

I do say again, "merit" is relative; it has to do with what the arena is. Change the arena and you change what is alpha pup and what is dead runt.

Conservatives have a hubris about their good luck (and mediocrity!).

Also when talking about _group_ intelligence one NEEDS to state the curve slope not just the "mode". Is it soft knee or sharp like North East Asia? (where few people above 123 exist, all clustered around 109).
(Compare Eurosphere: where there is ca 13% above 121; but an abysmal horde down at 100.) I still don't know the black curve and I've been around race sites for a while now. Do any race types even know it?

~~~~~~
**Note it is not the 'Mean'. Mean is standard division: how many times up to bat compared to how many hits. 'Mode' is for plurality sets.

It is scary that college people who study this don't know that.

[...T'is all part of the english/french/dutch vibe to corrupt their schema. Maintaining consistency is "oppressive". An example is their spelling and pronunciation systems which have absolutely gutted the concept of phonetibet...]

If anyone knows why "mean" is used instead of "mode" I'd like to know.

---------
Also what exactly is the mechanism for this "regression to the mean" which is used?

What is probably meant is dumb people adopted into smart families are still dumb (same for anyone). Ie you demonstrate liberals are full of blank slate hogwash.

Well yes. But I assure all that people's sperm don't just magically 'regress to the mode', just because the environment is now selecting for dunce and breeding the intelligent chiefs of yore into extinction.

Smart people generate sperm (and egg) that codes for clever more often than do dumb folks. If not, then "evolution" wouldn't work like it does. ['evolution" = variant pups and selection; niche-stasis (temporary) creates snowballs of morphologic(shape/qualities) tweaking].

(Also when talking about breeding, there is the "Liger" thing ["recombinant gender sorting"]. The fact we don't know more about that very relevant part of inheritance is all part of that sophister-convoluter-distorter thing. That is why it was important to keep "them" out.)

___________________
===================
RED HAIR STUFF

Red hair doesn't guarantee high IQ. But what it does is it effects the nervous system. Or rather the chemicals that make red hair etc effect the nervous system in a way that leads to more exchange between the neurons more quickly.

There have been papers about that --especially from Britain. (Where else? lol) Note it was framed as "redheads are more susceptible to pain than everyone else", for PC reasons.

Note --and everyone should already know this-- cutaneous system and nervous system are the same in the womb.

Red haired females seem to express this tendency differently. Meaning --and to be as curt as I am with gulls-- they often appear very ditzy. I wonder why. (Testosterone or etc mitigates redhair chemicals?)

Red head chemicals are simply one feature of a complex soup called that individual. But if those red hair type chemicals are there it gives the nervous system a boost in addition to what ever that individual's aptitude was going to be anyway --making it more responsive to stimuli (and quicker at laying in memory).

Search for it. Especially if you're a red head. I save nothing because I would never pay Mankind the compliment.

==========
"T" IS FOR TESTOSTERONE

Testosterone in the womb and testosterone flood in early puberty are two different things.

That has been explained before. But there are so many studies and so much distraction and bunk, things get lost on top of getting stomped. (It's just like there are too many entertainment choices.)

So if a man is high IQ and High T, it probably is womb testosterone rather than the puberty infusion (puberty infusion being equated with brutish male or female thuggery). (In short in-utero T creates the systems of the body early on; puberty T acts like a hormone which shapes behavior.)

High T womb are often bald.

Testos is not the simple PC buzz word it has been demonized as.

It is more complicated; in a complicated nurture soup that mitigates it further.

Testos is what makes men smarter than females. (Cell and tissue, organ and system formation itself in the womb.) It's what makes the best men very smart and virile [and braggarts in front of pussy too].

What people are trying to express through the demonization of T is... male puberty has always been a quandary for civilization. Ie quandry for the aging en statused males who want to maintain their _sedentary_ rank [access to sex] as the young princes roar in the night for the [sexual] territory.

Fine. But it is a question of who's going to deal with that 'problem' (of males maturing). ?Men who have the best interest of their sons* --ie their own continuation-- at heart when they organize up some kind of 'social contract'**? Or will it be ethnic aliens who want to geld the host culture males; or female wallflowers with ax to grind issues; and/or other females(basically normal) who are simply envious and angry at boys?

(These 'other females(basically normal)' are confused and dualistic in their anger and demand for male-stunting, since females still expect boys to become men in order to be worth anything. ...Reason number four billion six hundred [and] fifty two why females should not be in charge of anything or be considered "philosophers".)

_________
[*Fathers are a threat to sons as sons are a threat to fathers. This has always been the THING. Whether literally in a family or abstractly between the generations. Take many mammals as ex: Either the adult male runs the young male(s) off the land or the younger run(s) the adult off; Humans have complexifed /muddy that like we do everything --with our specially designed complexifier growing on our shoulders.

Man has not dealt with this well. ...Constant coup d eta and counter-strategy snowballs and pendulums have complexified to the point a female hyper-leverage _hive structure_ developed.

That above is what I'm getting at when I talk of MY "alpha beta gamma theory" of human evolution and civic/political snowballs.]

[**Note many/most fathers are already princess-spoiling enablers.]

=================
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Alpha beta gamma Stuff.

Faculties etc are "liberal" because they are the ascendant beta males (lower testosterone) of the recent coup d etas.

"Liberalism" is the desire to marginalize 'high T' males. The expression of that fear and desire is all the liberal canards, lies and protectionist political-coalition tactics.

An endless string of coups make up history yes. But the recent coups were specifically called parliament-democracy and liberalism.

Note National Socialism was a counter-coup movement comprised of what I call 'continental late Jacobins'(whether they know it or not). It was beaten back; mankind is still reeling from that.

Capitalism is part of the low T fear and desire too; it needed to clear the Highlands (high T males) to create a safe environment for 'commerce' back in actual Jacobin days.

This exposes the root false dichotomy between 'conservatives" and liberals. This is why the lower "right" (usually neo masculine rebellions[whether they know it or not]) can't win.

The above are all just the latest vocabulary words for a dynamic that is ancient.

The wandering jews just complexify this being both beta male types And enemy aliens who have a need to geld host culture rams.

We don't know what I'm talking about because no one is self aware enough or honest enough --or consistent enough in their own made up BS ("science"/antropology/sociology/ HBD)-- to frame it this way.