Saturday, January 22, 2011

Round and Round... Where She Stops?...

The Rise and Fall of Civilizations.

I published this in say '99 on the net.

(It is the thing I alluded to a few weeks ago when I said "[an early post of mine deals with the civilization/technology snowball hitting a kind of matriarchy- /
feminism- autopilot where it doesn't need men anymore whether they shrug to stop matriarchy or not.]")


Civilizations rise and fall. Why?


-dimorphic sex=500myr emasculation between hermaphrodites; mature stunt immature; immature can finish growing and stunt their own immature if given the opportunity.

-gender quid pro quo=apple grower and orange grower; each trades surplus to get the other they need; female humans trade reproduction/temporary fidelity, male humans trade material goods males fight over.

-alpha beta/gamma principle=middle males rabble rouse low males and use them as tool against high males.

-civi means literate, 5500yrs ago, diffusion from Sumeria/Babylon; priest class at top and specialist variations at bottom in triangle shape caste; the consequence of larger society created by agri techno (10,000yrs ago).

Barbarians in two groups: alpha-robust and beta-gracile, a la alpha beta/gamma principle. Civilization is the beta-gracile of the barbarian tribal competition. Civi beats barbs because strength-in-numbers (specifically outflanking and specialist-focus techno-invention) works best.

A fledgling civi might appear male dominant compared to later phases of the same civi, but civi is gracile and effeminate compared to the surrounding barbs. The whole "matriarchies of the bush and of the past while civi is white male patriarchy that created war" narrative is incredibly fraudulent. The fact its given credence at all expose the extent of the DarkAge we are in.

Civi is in two groups: "Spartans"(barb echo) and "Athenians"(large coalitions of gracile diverse specialists). Athenians, over the long haul, beat Spartans for the same reason civi beat barbs-- large diverse specialist groups do better.

Athenians are in two groups: geniuses and fools; fools outnumber geniuses.

Fools beat geniuses for the same reason Aths beat Sparts and civi beats barbs: strength in numbers overwhelms the better, stronger, individuals.

The "fools" become more decadently "liberal", because civi's techno snowball keeps alive new and more gracile "freaky" variations. And, especially, the techno snowball creates easy lives; like puppies that never mature (stunted children). [Chinese proverb: children become weak skinned living under the shade tree planted by their parents.] Ie new nurture types can develop all manner of new chemistries and consequent reflexes --including infantile decadences.

Then the decadence and childishness--through snowballing straws on the camel's back--tilts over to de facto female emancipation, when the male fashion becomes more immature and stunted than the females. Females raise the price of her fidelity, her loyalty and respect. Some females will raise the price of the quid pro quo while other females indeed even try to mature into males, escaping stunted emasculation to become stunters.

Since men won't continue working if they can't win females through their efforts, men stop working. When men stop working, civi naturally falls into disrepair (because of the Vines of Nature doing their thing). female emancipation--the "last straw" (critical mass) of civilization's success, liberalism--collapses civi.

The surrounding barbarians (and the re toughened up--re 'robust' ized, barbarian-ized--men of the felled civi) then start the cycle over again --two groups form and then cleave: robust and gracile, barbs and civis, sparts and aths, etc-- occupying the collapsed or collapsing city like so many vines of Nature.

Each time this has happened the next emerging civilization's literate elites refuse to teach or even accept (psychological denial)-- or they can't understand--that a snowballing chain-reaction-- civi success leading to leisure, to soft skin, to female leverage, to bummed men, to disrepair--pulled down the previous civilization's infrastructure(men working). Most can't or won't see that de facto female-emancipation is what killed the "older race of man". Thus the cycle continues-- civi will fall again.

Each time the cycle happens, it becomes less likely (when female emancipation occurs) that the civi will outwardly fall, because the techno snowball is achieving a type of "auto pilot". The shell of civi is becoming impenetrable to Nature's vines, whether men work or not; not to mention, there are few surrounding true barbarians left to push the walls in and start the cycle over.

The human hive kept having false starts, but now the 5500yr old con-game of immatures ("civi") is finally permanently consummating {organizational symbiosis, or "slush balling"*}. female emancipation happened once again yet this civilization (english-french) still thrives... for now. I wonder how many more times the cycle will repeat until a permanent neo-hermaphrodite / female bio tech hive collective--like a giant termite mound "spore-ing"--spreads its "silver seeds to a new home in the sky".

{*This reference is from another post I made in tandem with this one about the Principles of the Universe... Slush balling chain-reactions create more complicated symbiotic chain-reactions.}


Wednesday, January 12, 2011

female discrimination and societal blindness to it

females are just as discriminatory and superficial-- _if not more so_-- than males are. Especially true since society accepts and promotes discrimination against men and pedestal-izes female behavior. (It always has, therefor feminism's whole original root premise is faulty.)

Female lenses and criteria are simply sometimes a little different though from men's. Ie genders want different things from each other.

Eg females hate male weakness like males hate fat chicks. (I feel sorry for fat chicks [see * below] --but I'm also sorry for men, one of which is me.) And now females are "lookists" too on top of their other forms of objectification.

And females are certainly less empathic when  it comes to making fun of the opposite gender (females have standard inferiority complex issues). Females are also crueler and less empathic, in most categories social babble measures (eg crime and punishment).

Society has used the different lenses boys and girls use to say "females are less discriminatory towards males than the reverse." But that is wrong. (Note that most EVERYTHING western society believes and says about gender and females is a lie, ignorance or delusion.)

To deny the above makes one either delusional, ignorant or a sycophant to female power (or makes one female which is another way of saying delusional). (That male sycophancy is a root reason men defend feminism BTW. Think monks carrying an emperor baby on a pillow.. all must bow to the procession... except the monks. )

Monday, January 10, 2011

Willfully blind bigotry, biology, gender equality hypocrisy

I am very pleased with what the feminists have achieved thus far. It means that if I have any daughters - that they have a chance in society.

That's like saying "I'm in the Klu K klan and I very pleased with what the racists have achieved thus far. It means that if I have white children they have a chance."

Problem is liberal Enlightenment Age O Reason society was not supposed to be that. (It is all "unintended consequence" snowballing along*). So if liberal society becomes an apparatus to achieve unconstitutional anti male bigotry and female pedastilizing deification, something is very, very wrong.

(*It is INSTINCT to fight over female sexual value; it is HUMAN instinct to fight over it by displaying protector ability in a quid pro quo. And now modern civi keeps alive too many low IQ males who are simply machines of libido instinct(eg people like you); thus they are stuck in a groove... A very politically efficient groove.

Ie hypocrisy regarding this "gender equality experiment" was inevitable given the underlying biological truth of the human species.)

The fact you don't perceive your belief as bigotry(and can't/don't grapple with the underlying biological motivations for it) says reams about YOU.

Sunday, January 9, 2011


IQ tests in childhood and then marginalization of the those with IQs below say 120 ish solves ALL problems.

Also tests in childhood for "future tense perception / honesty" with marginalization of those who don't cut muster solves all problems.

If not, the neo cortex become extinct, as mankind turns itself into a hive of drones filled with all of the once fought-against "oppressions" necessary for such dynamics to prevail.


Morality is a chemical chain reaction. (Like love or hate or jealously etc.) It (they) can be understood potentially. (Observe lab rat studies.)

Serial killers don't kill because they are "immoral" or "evil". They do because they have different chemicals in them; those chemical differences have been shaped by nature/nurture dominoe effects over the serial killer's formation. (The nurture part of that domino equation is the more complicated more profound part actually.)

Well take that extreme serial killer example/model and apply it to anything else in the behavior realm.

Alcoholics or fat people or _whatever._

Note lab rats injected with this or that chemical --or having various environmentally induced stresses applied -- have their behavior patterns fundamentally changed. They become cuddlier or cannibalistic just by tweaking their hormones etc or shaping childhood contingencies.

You have small minds and are not getting your minds around this.

Also as far as "philosophies" for why we do what we do... An _honest_ understanding of nature --"naturalism"-- will put things in perspective.

Eg teens don't fight or vandalize because they haven't found god yet. They are sexual pubescents attempting to establish sexual maturity/territory.

Or another example, "the evil other is coming to take me away he he, ha ha; the evil god must 'ave sent them to hurt our good god." We now understand these could be food supply/contentment/population etc issues (along with the above sexual territory desire), as we all migrate around writing a tale from our own perspective and seeing everyone else in OUR storyline as two dimensional in THEIR motivations --ie evil-- unlike us.

Religion based morality has failed to understand and solve the things it wants to understand and solve.

Next... The claim that "science is trying to make us all the same/ trying to alleviate or micro-control every ouchy." ...Well the deep-felt demand for alleviation is already there. That is why there is the plastic surgery industry; the diet book business; the remedial tutoring business etc, etc. Those methods are just sloppier at addressing this need.

As Star Trek's Dr McCoy said, "[It was barbaric, Jim (referring to 20th Cent medicine): cutting into people with things they called scalpels.]"

I understand that science will probably screw up this potential deep-understanding of how 'we' work... `cause humans suck. But it isn't like religion hasn't already failed at understanding any of this too.

As for the claim "scientists /atheists are just looking for excuses to have authority"... Well, There is no such thing as a world without someone/some group having the trump-say and/or winning (through one mechanism or another). That's all cross-canceled out stuff.

Now a bad thing to say about scientists/atheists... This panacea of edumacation will NEVER work. Hence my handle at


Raising Arizona

I would imagine the motive was immigration issues.

I also imagine the media KNOWS THIS.

Therefore the media saying the motive is "unknown" while at the same time connecting it to health care reform (more popular despite the astroturf) is typical media trick of the Ve is all equal freedom of speech culture.

The NY times Raising Arizona

I sent this to the times…

I question the timing of this article in the times. “The Study of Males”

Some female POL in Az just got shot in the head by some mentally ill “tea partier.” (Badly nurtured or abused… That’s what would be said, if the situation had different victims and perps.)

I wager the times ‘male studies’ story was sitting on the back burner waiting for an opportune time so it could equate it with “violence” or etc negative.

Also, that Charles McGrath article did not give good examples of extremism in the anti feminist movement.

A good example is…

…But denouncing those who don’t pray to females is a function of this upside down world you all (liberals, christians, “marxists”, capitalists) have created which is breeding the neo cortex into extinction faster than you can say Yankee Doodle.

End letter to times.

Begin note to spearhead about the above:

You guys want to play with the big boys, you need to learn the game.

That game is “Ve is all equal and freedom of speech” as demonstrated above by the times.

Mary Daly did say “[the male population should be kept at 10%].” I agree with that actually. *Which 10%* is the battle though.

Friday, January 7, 2011


Micro communities (ultimately on space platforms), father to only-son land handoff and bio tech making people so similar they are as machines, zero sexual mobility for fem sex value to artificial womb/female breeding.

The only solution. (More “equality/freedom/rights” schpiel is flat-earther talk; it is not a solution.)


This "diversity is good because it allows some humans to continue" is a warped lens like 'matriarchies of the past' is. A successful academic spreading meme that is wrong.

I'd rather focus man's energies on _curing_ disease rather than letting the diseases have their way with just "some" of us. I don't want man to just be grist for the natural selection mill.

"Diversity is good" ultimately means chaff. (Not to mention Balkanized civil wars forever as new 'races' form and grapple.)


Changing what society calls illness is as wishful as "just say no" politics. Cure it or terminate.

The logic of "acceptance" could apply to any difference /illness/dysfunction in the species.

By letting every variant live we are just creating new Balkanized "races" and a demand for new protection apparatus. Life=Zero sum game; One loses.


Anti fem so far is a "doomed venture".

So people go back to profiteering behind some other mask; or to furiously masturbating to the internet.

The sky is turning red. The rains will come next: The hibernating frogs will come out of their sand holes and gribbit the days and nights away. ...The politicking bureaucrat type will organize "donations"; the warriors will run and outflank and kill in all their glory; executioners will execute.

"Conciousness" still isn't raised enough. Not to mention perspicacious aptitude is still too low among the set. False --and failed --notions still abound. "Doomed venture" implication is thus seen by those with perspicacity.

A "critical mass" has not been achieved yet. Lightning rods [leaders] don't go up until storm clouds gather(murmurings in the crowd --followers). Without those storm clouds, a lightning rod is just a boar in a bar.


What if the guy being politically reeducated in your slapping story above was a feminist white knight mangina?

What if political reeducation was the only way to stop that guy?

There is nothing wrong with males being one tenth the population. The problem is it's the WRONG one tenth(idiots fools animals etc) the machine is breeding for.

As an evil socialist social engineer elite-- I want to prevent birth order effects which create much or most of the caste issues and personalities difference between people (thus hindering clarity, scope and consensus).


We simply need a revolution to CULL society of every last being that supports such feminsit /equality gibberish.

High tech military support-- at least a plurality of it --will be necessary.

Homeschooling can be now done through the computer. Find the best teacher of a thing (only like one per town or whatever) and have them teach EVERYONE one else through making a video class. That is better than warehousing 30 brats in a pecking order in some classroom.


The whole regime of western culture needs to be ousted. (And trust me it is men. Dumb brunette males en masse; they're in everything.)

The repubs will not stop any of this. That is a false hope. And not enough people will vote for 3rd party "independents".


Feminsim /liberalism all goes away once the so called right understands that killing is good; Abortion is good; eugenics is good; so called darwinism is rightist and good; fascist-socialism is good; that we come from a "patriarchy of the past" made matriarchal through technology-civilization-jebus cult-capitalism-"growth"-democracy.

Until that understanding happens, there is no reason for the BETTER MEN to lead anyone.

So back to masturbating to the internet.

Death to democracy.

Testing and sterilization.


Child brides.

I very much believe the age of "consent" should be lowered to historical levels for females. (Puberty.)

That is the only real way to stop feminism [and the feminists know that], since feminism is simply the inevitable results of females "maturing" in this culture of effete git males. (Ie civilization.)

[And the feminists know that too.]

The fact that you types don't understand that or advocate that says all ones needs to know about how you will never, ever, never --in million, gazillion --years ever stop feminism. Ever. Even if you clammer for a tax break everyday 24/7 super loud you won't stop feminism.

And you know why? 'Cause you are retarded for genetic reasons. It is what civilization breeds for. If not for civi your ilk--all of you-- would be long dead in battle over breeding rights. [And the feminists kinda get that too... Though they really only one mindedly understand gender stuff, then they fall right off the cliff of insight.]


We should have arranged marriage again. "Sympathetic romance" is another failed Euro invented policy, going back almost ages (in some quarters).

=========== woman deserves to be beaten"

Wrong. And 'beaten' is interesting choice of words.


You don't believe in killing an enemy that is enslaving you?


Magic won't work. Because magic/god aint real.

But loopy fems think magic is real. And therefore having them think we are using magic against them will work. Ie made-obvious spells towards them will work. (Note witches hate you wearing black and red.)

(God is less real than magic; ie it is possible to have a mystical plane of activity without any of our god beliefs being real.)


If at that time "we" don't advocate a strong state _purposly and vehemently suppressing certain freedoms and classes/breeds,_ we will be right here again.


I say we support feminist's goal of dismantling the _american_ R&D community.

The men in power know that it is suicide to play games with US R&D science tech. So they diverted the females away from it. They patted wimmins on the head.

I say we join forces with our "sisters" and expose the sexist congress for marginalizing the females and their important "equality in science & tech" agenda at once!

Then we can move on to helping females become most the of the military too. It is more than about time!

When will this outrage against wimmins end?!!

Call your congressthing now!!

More wimmin in the military and police now!

Make the west put up or shut up...

Betcha can't...


Christianity and anti feminism are NOT synonymous. Feminism means feminism nothing more and nothing less.

Sunday, January 2, 2011

Useful idiots of conservatism

Late soviet Russia etc and China etc were more to the right on feminism, immigration, homosexuality than america and britain ever were. I defy any of you to demonstrate otherwise.

(Please teach me. But don't bother publishing some pages from some books written a century (or whenever) ago about the goals of a marxist revolution. Also note that if conservatives consider the marxist revolution bad then why do they advocate democracy and all the enlightenment claptrap _since that stuff is the slippery slope "road to socialism"?_ And why did they fight the "fascists"?

Democracy trends inevitably lead to "marxist" social reforms, as history has seen through the 'american 20th century'. Even if that is unintended (ie not part of 'the book's' american revolutionary goals), it is none the less the way it went down.)

The reasons later Russ etc and China etc were to the right of western conservatives are probably that Soviet military comportment for males and the way those nations fought during the mid 20th century; and also lack of techno growth. That had some kind of UNintended consequence on their "group psychology" --it 'hardened' them-- which then led to swatting the female/liberal humping dog off soviet society's leg.

What "conservatives" lens through when looking at political issues is whether or not an area has jesus cult (or "feotal rights"), techno growth(which is the root of liberalism BTW) and some undefined political euphemism (ie politico stump trick) called "freedom for the people." ("freedom for the people:" ie radical fringe liberalism of the past ...before conservatives imbibe it as "common wisdom".)

And that lens is caused by simple instinctual nationalist impulse --like a guard dog who barks at 'other' on instinct. Ie no real thought or big picture --just a dog brain howling, looking to keep other dogs "out". That instinct conservatives have is why they are ALWAYS used as "useful idiots" by western cosmopolitan liberalism (ie feminism and etc academic and social revolutions).

To see how the western conservatives are simply the military wing and wallet of snowballing social liberalism [which is NOT "progressive"--rather cult like actually], one need look no further than the west's war on moslem countries now. That is an example of how the above phenom of 'inevitable acceptance of fringe liberalism as Common Wisdom and then becoming a useful idiot' has always worked.

High liberals are going to have to wake up to the fact that people are not equal inherently (bred to be feudal serfs actually) and their different nurture syndromes just make that truth worse. And 2-) that the western "rights machine" (more a business now) has thrown people under the bus -- through phenomena that should be understandable to high liberal types since they use complexity based, psychobabble understandings in other cases when it suits their purposes. Also further wake up to the fact that liberalism doesn't achieve its original stated goals.

(Not to mention much of the 'rights machine' was dis ingenuously motivated by and vectored in by savvy middle brow immigrants.)