Tuesday, March 8, 2011

wimmins history month and take your daughter stuff

It is wimmins history month in March. They’ll be lotsa of stuff like that now (and again in September/October I noted too –that’s their secret newsletter “action item” time).

Regarding unconstitutional female only career drives…

If there was any real evidence that a company or institution paid a female less, the thousand and one private and govt equal opportunity commissions and lawyers would be all over it.

Society ignores the fact that males show far more downward and negative indicators in all categories liberals choose to measure (normally meant to show the class so labeled as downward is oppressed by complicated institutional “power of suggestion”): underachievement, health, life span, sex partners, upward mobility, suicide, incarceration, workplace health etc, etc. Meanwhile we trump up female petty downward indicators (eg not enough apply to NASA) and present them as evidence that patriarchy is real and through its behavior and display damaging females in some way.

How many girls in your high school and college did you see that were under siege from a patriarchy? And if there were any, what schools in what towns `cause I’m moving there. …Ie we all went to school– we all know the deal: females are liars and sub intellectual, often callous, who are running amok in a grande dalliance environment. (We’ve even invented new fancy words for this enviro to protect our deification of females _and ourselves given our instinctual libidinous desire to aspire towards them_: “serial monogamy”.) But we are told by authority that fem privilege is not the case –that the females are actually oppressed and hurt. And tunnel-vision lens-ed, just-so data is published to “prove” it. …And the weak-minded cave in first and that starts a domino effect synergy.

Willfully blind bigotry, biology, gender equality hypocrisy…

People say (especially those simpletons with daughters) “I am very pleased with what the feminists have achieved thus far. It means that if I have any daughters – that they have a chance in society.”

That’s like saying “I’m in the Klu Klux Klan and I very pleased with what the racists have achieved thus far. It means that if I have white children they have a chance.”

Problem is liberal Enlightenment Age O Reason society was not supposed to be that. (It is all “unintended consequence” snowballing along*). So if liberal society becomes an apparatus to achieve unconstitutional anti male bigotry and female pedestal-izing deification, something is very, very wrong.

(*It is INSTINCT to fight over female sexual value; it is HUMAN instinct to fight over it by displaying protector ability in a quid pro quo. And now modern civi keeps alive too many low IQ males who are simply machines of libido instinct; thus they are stuck in a groove… A very politically efficient groove.

Ie hypocrisy regarding this “gender equality experiment” was inevitable given the underlying biological truth of the human species.)

The fact you don’t perceive your belief as bigotry(and can’t/don’t grapple with the underlying biological motivations for it) says reams about YOU.

It is not a question of “right” to make “equal pay for equal work”. There is no right to work (or education, or any other pretense or political conceit humans hold dear)! Work is something men do to compete over female “hypergamy” tendencies ( = discriminatory up based infidelity ['up' is case specific/caprice]).

…”Female deer have a ‘right’ to grow antlers” : “female humans have a ‘right’ to ride a horse into battle [swords a cleaving]“. It doesn’t make any sense. [Note male deer are fighting each in headbutt suomo competition _over_ female wandering tendencies. Antlers have been selected in only males as the unwitting tool of success. It was not a conspiracy to keep females out of anything. Same with sapien competition.]

Few males win and _most lose_ –EVEN WITHOUT Feminism’s amplification of that Problem. (Note ‘problem’ is a relative construct.)

Taking status positions away from males simply pushes more males into the loser pit.

Also note:


techno roll

I do like my assumption that repro techno allows “misogyny” to reproduce in ways it hasn’t yet.

Techno got us in, and techno will have to get us out.

It is not a certainty that we will win though. …What type of creature man will be by the time “men’s” victory is achieved etc? I have not seen male dominant hives (how ever one might define “male dominance”).

(Someone once said to me about that (a dame from soc men, so it is probably one of these dames here with new nym) “is that light up ahead the end of the tunnel or the train?…)

But note we also have never seen other chimps leave orbit either. …Behold the beast man… How like a God.


We must balance –like a dancing bear– on a runaway snowball.

We can’t all just run away and “join the Amish” as our way of pulling out the plug on civi/femi. …The quilt is not big enough.

…And most crucially those that don’t run away will simply claim “eminent domain” trump card [over the Amish and other Luddites] at _their leisure_.

I’m thinking that as repro techno starts to negate female sex value it creates opportunity for “misogyny” to pass on like never before in history. Not to mention generations of children raised without female “nurturing” in their heads.

The males who can’t allow that “misogyny” –say those that make daughters etc (ehem)– have to be marginalized by more of the same techno HOPEFULLY IF/WHEN.

And that is the real battle right there actually.


Some of my thoughts on “human-father being princess enablers”…

This “father protecting his daughters” instinct IS a harem lord instinct. A harem lord instinct, after it has been reworked by the “normative consensus” of what the others males will allow.

Ie history has shaped the human male into a creature who doesn’t actually have sex with his harem(family) as he fends other males away from this harem. (I wager human fathers get the same kind of high a victorious gorilla or deer does after a successful battle.)

Think what we’ve done to the wolves: border collie herding sheep. It stalks and chases prey(sheep) in partnership with its alpha (the human) but he doesn’t actually bite them or take them down.

Father-protect is also a demonstration to the female who he is having sex with (his wife) that he protects well. …Like a male bower bird bringing a blue lighter to female: blue lighter serves no acute material purpose other than triggering the female into ‘thinking’ he is a good forager.


    Cohen will end up married with children and screwed in divorce court.

    l will figuratively be there, cheering her, when he be screwed.

    Cohen is sacrificial lamb. He’s a very useful example. No mra stuff could even come close to how cohen promotes the mra agenda.


It is also likely though that he'd eat the burden of his own oppression (eg in divorce court etc) in order to get you oppressed (by feminism) too.

His benchwarmer ressentiment is strong in him and his tribe.

The problem the "tribe" has with us is deep, deep seated. They are prepared to sacrifice their balls to get your dick removed. It is instinctual.

Ie I believe he is not an ignorant white knight goy protecting woman (like many white males are). I believe he is a mangina in a profound quest to get rid of masculinity because it scares him (when others have it).