Finale, Solutions

Finale, Solutions
(Just a sketch)

Stopping fem is two fold.

How to stop the system we have now and what system to create that prevents these problems in the future. By solving the 2nd problem first, it gives us the rally cry means to solve the first one, since the masses don't jump out of the frying pan until they know there is something other than fire beyond.

2) How to prevent fem forever. Preventing fem forever entails understanding how fem happened...

We keep alive too many weak males for the last few centuries/millenia. Feminism is a trick the runt males use to box out the better males. This emboldens females.

-----
I advocate and recommend stopping pro fem breed and belief --in all of its manifestations and prerequisite-antecedents-- for all times and always-- through _any_means_ necessary.

Note that there is no such thing as equal: Equal is rally cry (and solution attempt) of battles passed; it is long since exposed as balder dash.

BS --like “hope” and the rest of the altruism largess apparatus-- is ultimately simply tactical on the part of the speaker since the utopia espoused can't happen but replacing others with _your_ greed & need can.

I understand freedom is a bloody word. Most people don't have the stomach for it. At _best_ they can fight every once and a while to try to free themselves from some acute enslavement. But they don't have the courage or brains/foresight to see the larger causes that lead to each liberation revolution always falling short. Therefore they don't have the whatever to nip the problems in the bud. Non the less long term solution are needed --a big picture rassion d tre.

All the talk about protecting inferiors and all. That's what unraveled the west originally.

================

Solving The Human Condition Woes:

.Testing and sterilization of the stupid and cruel (start by testing before voting);

.Make everyone the same in childhood (but 'up' rather than 'down' sameness) --since most politics is unwitting reactionarism /venting from kidhood;

._Control of female hypergamy instinct_ through any means. (Men shouldn't be squeamish here; men "anthropomorphize" females more than they deserve.)

=======================

The anglo colonial idea (america et al) of running away to the hinterland as a way of getting away from the hive and its blabbering hypocrisy is a dead end. That hinterland solution has been said all along before; It is the exploration age and colonial ethos. It didn’t work the first time.

...Gamble that civi self destructs through all the worker bees it forces into John Galt status.

How many more generations, runaway, can last un ‘absorbed’ in the outback? _Especially relevant question, since all --pertinently the females-- know how to use a phone now._

I think the fight is in the cities etc. Control of media and military [catch 22 there].

Convince soldiers, mano e mano, that they fight for the wrong side --ie their enemies-- as duped Useful Idiots; seize media; convince the rest. Note, soldiers are very thick though; La Machine likes it that way (Natural Selection doing its thing, selecting for conformist simple minded warrior drones).

Then once victory achieved, a strong _government_ created so as to prevent the problems of liberalism from ever rearing up again. (Ie get that whole “government is a bad word” thing out of your skulls; and you don’t need a “tax break” either, you dupes.)

If man makes it to an ‘undiscovered continent’ (eg space platforms), then varying social models will spring again, including MicroCommunities.

Once there, I’d recommend for the MicroCommunities A) being very isolated; and B) grappling with, so far un analyzed, gender (ie the females), child rearing and rank and caste issues among the male monkeys. Be aware that controlling gender and status issues --ie creating contentment-- will stifle “growth"/change. ...Thus allowing the more vibrant and hungry effete hives to find and absorb the MicroComms --unless MicroC are well out of reach. Natural Selection will do its thing.

=======================

The only long term solution to stopping the endless cycle of coup d eta which unraveled mankind is one-male-per-territory land owners; every male gets a plot and owned female(s). Think contented gorillas as opposed to revolutionary chimps. Use techno (genetic etc) to make everyone the same (and females compliant).

Space travel gives us raisson d tre rally point (something to do, rather than ‘invading slavia’ again or etc). And it creates room and another go/turn to try the scheme.

But first "Protectionism".

Abolish capitalism as a way of opposing liberalism, since they are more symbiotic than kidney failure and dialysis. Capitalism and democracy = doom, just like the jesus thing wound up equaling.

Once power is garnered (through protectionist BigTent triangulations), replace military, media, lawyers and academics too.

Then policy... Policies of eugenics and antifeminism; and space colonization. (Eugenics and anti fem achieved through soapbox economic protectionism.)

Long term...

Control breeding and rearing:

Male only land owners; one son only, who then passes baton to his one son on his own part of the large land plot, cyclically (two corners of a plot, back and forth over the generations). (Immortality techno might obsolete that.) Trespass is mortal crime; zero sexual mobility for females (ankle monitoring, etc possibly). Use Interwebs to link all male landowners who can remain individuals yet be plugged into, as neurons, a giant brain collective. Ie. Civilization yet still rural --'Ideal Mankind' [Himmler, Jefferson... and Mendelssohn too]. Teach the generations over same network.

Spread to orbit then beyond.

Out of the trees and off our knees.

Out of the larval cocoon.

(...But you are naughty children who will do it your own way. Enter our history as femdom Borg... who bring us to the same celestial destiny anyway.)

=================

1)How to stop it acutely/how to topple this regime? (People will say "hey that's a terrorist threat". No, it is a terrorist promise...)

Some media control then military coup then instantaneous media/law and elite putsches. More consciousness-raising first; Need better challenges to fem boiler plate [DV and stuff].

The fact females are ineffective in combat is a plus not a minus. We want america-- and the rest of the anglo-jew controlled west-- to start losing its wars.

....
Let's end lying to, emotionally abusing* and manipulating men. (*including but not limited to secret telling and gossip)

Let's end mothers abusing their children. (And I ain't talking about abortion.)

Let's end lesbian partner violence.
....

====================
>
“What do you propose for a solution [to single fem parent]? Forced marriage / re-marriage of single parents?”
>

Um...

1 Preventing them [wimmins] from breeding (through reversible sterilization) until claimed by passable adult male [see below 3b] then preventing them from divorcing?

2 Take away lone female social and economic "rights". ('Rights' is a made up term by con artists; those such as yourself. I don't actually acknowledge the term.)

3 Testing and sterilization before hand.

3b Elimination of under males/ replacing them with work machines (or 3c getting rid of 'low' males and then letting civilization die in favor of... "the matriarchy of the tribal past" LOL). [FYI, We do not come from matriarchies; indeed the whole concept of patriarchy and matriarchy is ever shift-able just so tale.]

4 Replacing of females with artificial womb technology (including conscripting other mammals [headless] (though I personally like animals too much), until full artificial wombs can be fabricated). [We could conscript altered human females so, actually.]

4b "Medicating or treating"(surgically) female humans to be more compliant "citizens".

Just a few solutions off the top of my head. Shall I go on?...


Oh BTW, jesus saves and when do I get my tax break?

I mean that's what it's all about right? Your type says whatever kind of protectionist utopian BS you want --literally ignoring your betters who have thought "utopia" all through already-- and then the the half brained, dog on leash Useful-Idiot 'conservatives' respond "tax break" or "but what about the lord?" Then every once and while your class lets them off the leash to go bite your enemies.

=============

If you’re concerned about race issues, form up with the Russians. It should’ve gone down like that in the mid 20th cent --instead of that disaster. Note the Slavs are a little meaner/more masculine than the Brits, though.

=============

As for race and feminism...

females need to be massively disenfranchised. Permanently.

Then internal human reproduction needs to be replaced with ‘external womb incubators’. (Not simply to allow abortion to be more easily outlawed (death to jebus cult).) External wombs will allow _consistently controlled_, _always pre-planned human procreation_ to occur. Also cloning techno and genetic health and disease techno needs to be mastered.

Either liberalism --which is a female trend-- will be nullified and therefore race replacement will stop. OR “race replacement” will occur and then the Euro-sphere females will get what they have coming.

...A new chimera breed will form from the enslaved loins of the remaining Euro females.

Either way the human female will be segregated from political life.

A grand cosmic irony befitting the make-believe Great Savant in the Sky.

As the wind laughs…

====================================
Eugenics

Smart people self sterilize all the time. It’s called thinking it through. The dumb can’t think it through so they should be forced to make the right decision (the decision to breed slowly and carefully).

Pain and suffering will be the norm in a race of idiots. Even if it is not ‘thought’ about.

Remember, either way “genics” happens. It is just a question of which strains will thrive --and whether these strains will be called “Eu-” or "Dys-”. (Note 'eu' or 'dys' are relative constructs.)

It gets even more complicated than that unfortunately; eg “heredity” etc. But the premise is super sound.

Meaning... er um... dog breeds [b]do[/b] form through selecting of characters from the litter BUT it isn't always a `straight line, given the 'profundities' of 'he's got grandma's nose and great grandpa's ears'.

(Few of those 'profundities' --from the 19th and 20th century explosion of epiphanies-- have trickled down and been imbibed properly because of the [i]political problems[/i]--problems in part created by the propaganda crusade to rally dopey johnny and his holy babble].)

But the premise of selective breeding always happening _whether we "take the bull by the horns" or not_ is super sound. [`T'is.]

And this 'taking the bull by the horns' is not synonymous with 'invading Slavia and engaging in "Draconian anti saboteur policy" [as retreating in dire straights occurs]; nor is it synonymous with inviting sanctimonious, hypocritical carpet bombing.

Most don't characterize eugenics any where near correct. ...Strawmen wherein the word 'eugenics' means German late war (WWII) slaughter --allied induced or scorched earth Goeterdaammerung.

If the dumb whites ascending in recent centuries are not sterilized, the “race” will die through the weight of their ill thinking majority muscle anyway.

This isn’t that complicated either.

============

Anti eugenicists would do better to say "techno can make everybody fit into a 'good stock' template without the sterilizing of 'undesirables' [since the [gene/medical] tech will eliminate the undesirables `at the gate through its advances]."

Yeah well so long as the stupid and the frontmen profiteer shysters (which the polite call lawmakers etc and capitalists etc) are in charge (not to mention the jew/media) chances of the gene/medical techno snowball being used for "good" are slim.

Like most things that have gripped white maledom, it's a catch 22... If we could only get rid of the giant peter-principle [mediocres failing upwards] structure of Lilliput, we'd be in a perfect position to... get rid of the giant peter-principle structure of Lilliput.

Also, allowing other types --_who have grievances with the intelligent, healthy white male host_-- to be "upgraded" to "our" aptitude is potentially shortsightedly dangerous.


Nurture is very real. And it's still all biodeterminism, since it's all bio chemistry. A petry dish doesn't recognize nature nurture sophistry.

To understand nature nurture, look at allergies. Two [b]different[/b] types walk through a hay field; one gets the sniffles and the other doesn't. It is genetics. Now take that one that does get the sniffles... If he never comes across hay, he will never get the sniffles. It is nurture/environment. (Hay is just an analog here--it can apply to lotsa scenarios.)

Also "lead in the water" changes someone's nervous system and therefore creates different end results. "Lead" is just one example of how monogenerational contingency effects bio-chemistry of individual.

Liberals take these facts and use them unscrupulously and hypocritically (just like the fact of right /wrong, and good /bad being relative constructs). Often jews, yes.


(By the way, regarding testing and eugenics, females are the 'carriers' of most social disease; the sons who are patho/ violent, bums, the weird etc are the expression of that disease. 'Female sexual value' --or more properly the instinct it has unwittingly bred for in ever competing males-- causes many/most to not see that.)


There is no ‘gene’ for things per se. “Gene” is a glib way of stating a premise.

There ARE differences in the tissues and etc bio chemistry between individuals; there are differences in perception, problem solving and prediction ability between individuals; the biochemistries are the roots of the different perception, problem solving and prediction abilities.

Genes turn food("energy") into those tissues and biochemistries. Genes express differently depending on which genes they have wound up near on the genome.

Environmental effects --acting like sideswipes / blind-sidings" on the food converting processes-- just further complexify the premise.

_________________________________________
====================================
Free Range pussy and 'Pick Up Artist' "Game" Culture


Females should be regulated. Free range pussy is as ridiculous as cattle randomly walking down the street.

Once men figured out how to domesticate food (a'la Steve Martin's caveman bit on SNL), the whole world radically changed.

We need such a revolution when it comes to these ill mannered, self centered discriminatory children (er um "females" I believe is the polite term) that the neo cortex must use for reproduction.

Down with 'free range pussy' setting terms for everyone. Regulate the female.

_"Down with Free Range pussy."_

Until then...

'Game' simply means, girls (like all people) are automatonic: when a stick is thrown they WILL CHASE IT.

The Christians and the liberals hate this, for it exposes their polite fictions which hold together this caste structure of runts as absurdity. Game pisses off all the right people and that's good.

It is very similar to the girl culture of gossip and legion 'wimmins magazines', where in females share tips about how to exploit men's most vulnerable needs for fun and profit.

That is why female et al outrage over 'game' is so... typical (hypocrisy). It is similar to the hypocritical outrage over "rock star and groupie culture": ...An arrogant-peacock man having rockstar leverage over people who are gaga needy and using them for fun is heinous, heinous, heinous and not very nice... unless you're an average or better (and talentless) teenage
girl doing it to her suitors and then it is a solemn right...

'Game' is "science"/Darwinism/anthropology/sociology/"socio-biology/evolutionary psychology/"HBD"** put into living practice --ignoring, _conspicuously,_ the sophistry based debates(looped in circles) that demand those subjects remain relegated to just theoretica.

You my dear are the object.

Fetch.

(_"science"/Darwinism/anthropology/sociology/"socio-biology/evolutionary psychology/"HBD"**_ **The reason the subject keeps changing its title is because the 'human sciences' are scary and controversial. The demagogues who ostensibly represent/parasite off of the scared masses come in with swords drawn to make the facts go away (and control the 'ceiling painting' implications of them). Ultimately the badly outnumbered intellects "abandon the field" to the sophists and protectionist demagogues. These intellects then set up shop somewhere else under a different name... until the "liberals" catch on and deploy their attack again...)

=============

For now porno is necessary to free males from the male and female created female sex-cartel.

But in the long run the boys are being exploited by pimps of various types (females or otherwise). That is the reason that AFTER the "revolution" porno will be controlled. _But NOT in the name of protecting females._

If and when the boys and men have access to sex when they want, porno won't be desired anymore for that reason.


==========

Others are right when they say "80% of dames doing 20% of dudes". This is the key thing. And yes it is the core of all 'inequality', discrimination, competition, health, caste and oppression. It is Not easy to solve though --especially when our society is born and bred full of dunces who can't begin to contemplate on that philosophical plane for genetic reasons. (That's why I say death to democracy.)

______________________________________________________________
=======================================================

Little Bo Pee Pee...


As the male human becomes more and more infantile (which is the side effect of men's coup d eta snowball of pulling down the dominant males and the primitive /robust way of life in general [which is the cause of "feminism"]), he is going to have to find a way to either stunt the females under his level of infantilism/sappiness or simply get rid of/purge the highest /most masculine/ most "self aware" females (who use to be kept in line by the long ousted dominant males).

If he doesn't, the praying mantis/black widow male-redundancy principle will trigger. Note that ubiquitous though conspicuously ignored "femdom" is that snowball getting rolling.

He can achieve this stunting of the females through... Promethean bio tech solutions or complicated biology shapings /personality shapings that come from complicated not understood socialization phenom (simply "nurture syndromes").

People don't get this stuff because the ascendant males of the runt-ocracy western man breeds for simply lack something important.

I challenge this notion that seeing a dick squirt a few years early "damages" a female. She is a _female_ for christ sake! --she's supposed to be "damaged" in that way. (If males can't accept that then 1 they can cut their dicks off (basically the modern agenda) and 2 not make any female children.)

Boys raised in single fem households --even if their is no sex involved-- are way, way more dysfunctional –unable to grow and “fledge” [like birds from a nest] “throw down” etc (self discipline, ambition/indolence etc)-- than a female who did 'it' with uncle.

Boinking/marrying a niece (and disciplining her too!) use to be totally normal for most until a few generations ago (it still is for much of the species). Stunting them – or the more popular way of saying it now "abusing their forming libidos" and “DV”-- is what makes a female stay female bio deterministically: if she keeps growing shes hits a type of maleness (or at least leverage).

Males don't want other males having easy access to sex so they look for any excuse to hamstring other males; they also display protector /mule abilities to females.

...Men discover a female who has been boinked young and then tell her she is "harmed" in some way as they get the blanky out and hot cocoa for her and tuck her feeties in (making a victim in the process) –calling out loudly a drag-net for the “offender” with finger in air and hand to their breast. And other older females will tell her she is damaged too, motivated by their understanding that she probably “lost” the “whose in charge” “eye contact” part of the encounter and motivated by their desire to use any trick/propaganda to get more deference from men (especially if they are wall flowers with axes to grind).

Note females specialize in “stare down” as toddlers, along with lifting their skirts when introduced to new older males and later walking on tip toes and sleeping with butts in the air. I don't know what that's supposed to mean... I'm just saying.

The boinked females “lost the [pyscho-babble] part of the encounter”. But that's just it-- we want them to “lose” this encounter. That's what undermines their sex cartel. Duh.

--------
On a related note, society invents elaborate canards that strippers and sex workers in general (eg porno) have so called “low body image” --said to be the side effect of uncle-etc boinking. LO freaking L: ...girls show their clams for a living with smirks on their faces to sailors for 2000 dollars a week because they are ashamed of their bodies [sarc]. Yeah, makes total sense. Egads!

I'll explain Sex workers (not junky street walker variety who are legally retarded)... They matured early (in modern america that is a synonym for Italian or other ethnic) and had the “pretty ones”[genitals] at the 11 year old all girl sleep-over pool-party (where girls explore same sex finger banging and the like). Ie they are the girls with _higher_ body image. Duh.
Then our simpering infantile society (jebus cult mixed with liberalism) --thru that simperingness _which emboldens_-- creates avenues for them with the lure of easy money and bad-ass status allure. (Probably false easy money lure: the market is swamped.)

------

Speaking of young gulls and the modern world...

Do 12 year old girls now shave their twats to look more grown up?...

================

How does having sex with the young female harm her?

All the females under 18 or 15 or even 13 who were married off in history were "harmed"?

Whatever harm you believe she incurs, others incur even worse harm in other categories without any sex involved yet society considers those other things "moral"/ not-harmful.

You don't think things through. You only see two domino effects of a 10 domino chain.

It's like Domestic Violence. If society doesn't allow the cheating wife to be "harmed", someone else will be by her untethered folly.

How does letting her escape the "harm" of feminine stunting not harm other people?

You're just making it up. Again, you don't think things through. You only see two domino effects of a 10 domino chain.

BTW, regarding Mylie Cyrus: Desire for Mylie Cyrus is not "pedo", being as she's a teen star. (She is a later blooming sappier redneck-type though. But thats good: we want to keep them there. Duh)

NOTE –and I never do this caps thing-- CONSERVATIVES –LIKE THE MASSES IN GENERAL--ARE DUNCES AND MINDLESSLY CONFORMIST AUTOMATONS AND GULLIBLE MULES WHO COULDN'T GET THEIR WAY OUT OF A WET PAPER BAG.

Tough guy white knights[tm] demonstrate that they believe in violence to make people obey.

So then it is just a question of WHAT people should obey.

For now the simpleminded types have embraced a total lie that the female humans are benign and good, when in truth she is the key to everyone's woe everywhere in all times.

Controlling her is key to all permanent solutions.

I wouldn’t come to the aid of any big mouth female ever.

That is one way to stop them.

So long as dunces –er uh I mean conservative men– continue to _mindlessly_, _instinctively_ defend females, the females will continue to snowball society down the path of more and more liberalism. Ie continue to damage people and society through tantrum.

The females are not sentient enough to understand or care that they are doing that. Like animals they –like most– only understand consequence in real time not potential. Ergo… let them go.

Another type of male is "Princess Spoilers"; they too are a core reason why we have feminism. ...Give the pathological squeaky wheel more and more oil ('or garsh, she'll scree'), while those with fewer mattress between themselves and the pea are told to "suck it up".

If you build bias into the system a minority of the malicious will use it unscrupulously.

=====================

Rape is a made up word. Especially in the Islam or Mormon instance of young female marriage.

This so called Islamic/Mormon “rape” really means not allowing females to charge a price; not allowing them to form a sex cartel; not allowing them to manipulate "Useful Idiot" infantile males into enslaving themselves.

The Mainstream West brainwashes it children to conform to its mores the same as those people "brainwash" theirs.

The Mainstream West has simply conformed to mores --often created by jews-- that trick it into thinking females are "equal" and should be "liberated".

You all --mainstream westerners-- then brainwash your children to those mores: you set up your male children to be "raped" by a system that not only doesn't have their best interests at heart but often outwardly despises them.

================

>
someone said, negatively: “sexual availability at puberty”
>>

Why shouldn’t wimmin be made to remain sexually available?

Men putting endless barriers around females (as their male reproductive strategy for marginalizing other males) is why we have the ambition, greed, political problems (triangulation: immigration, feminism etc) and the psychological /pathology problems, the chaotic economic/ ‘growth’ and environmental problems that we do in western culture.

Islamics and Polynesians and etc indolent cultures are non growth based --ie non environmentally destructive and non chaotic/ non pathologic-- specifically because the males are content…

…given the “sexual availability” of their females.

It is ironic that the west’s sexual revolution and “free love” led to the price of sex going through the roof (thereby exacerbating male competition to generate more for themselves --at others' expense-- so they can buy some acceptance and fidelity from a creature so en-pedestaled that she isn't use to offering any.

I find it fascinating that liberals have no problem advocating “redistribution of wealth” but are blind to the real wealth that biologically underpins and motivates all the other kinds of competition/ wealth acquiring.

Redistribute the real wealth!…

_Control the females_.

Liberals have always been bad at finding the point and that’s why they do so badly at the color in the circle with the number two pencil tests (hence they attack those tests as “arbitrary constructs” of some dark force called patriarchy).

People in western culture are like children that don’t understand what they really advocate. It’s just tantrum and endless political triangulations/ realignments venting failure issues from childhood.

=======================

Females are not equal.

Females need to be mute and stunted; or replaced.


Testing before voting.

Sterilize the dumb.

Abort the dopey (bio chemically diagnosed as such by future tech).


Christianity and democracy must be stopped.

Then Eugenics --ie testing in childhood and sterilization-- must be imposed. (Test(s) should look for intellect, health and sanity. Medical technology can be used to make one better prepared to 'pass' the test(s).)

If not the neo-cortex becomes extinct.

Simple.

===========

Never run.. It makes you look weak, thus leading to more, next time. Fighting back --and even losing-- is better. ...And then a nice speech/statement back at the mic, carpe diem style "[see what we mean? The 'injustice', etc.]".

============

I'm against sperm banks and adoption for anyone no less single fem parents. Children need to be raised by creatures that sense their aptitudes and characters.

.....................................................

Bombe, bombe, bombe per svegliare questi dormiglioni

“Bombs, bombs, bombs to wake up these sluggards"

+++++++++++++

Liberalism is not bad per se (all that vegetarianism and sappy this and sappy that). It is simply wrong: it makes bad decisions rooted in bad beliefs (most of that the fault of congenital shortcomings and complex snowballing implications of that). (Note I personally still pine for the northern “heroic” past (true conservationism), ‘cause I’m a child ‘alpha male’--the past is where I thrived --but it doesn’t ‘work’ or it would have already.)

+++++++++++++
===============
Males need to solve the man vs man problem --that starts in childhood-- that has plagued us time immemorial. Doing that will solve every other issue.

Competitivness _and_ genetic based difference (environmental difference just adds to that problem).

But more to the point "loss".

All politics is the side effect of reactionaryism from childhood.

The plug itself needs to be pulled that leads to the complexities that led to 'feminism'. Ie that led to civilization/jebus gobbly gook(wishful thinking)/democracy/feminism (and anti male marxism [which is jew motivated trick to marginalize host culture males]).

The alpha beta gamma coup d eta cycle has to be stopped itself.

We have the technologies and philosophical understandings now to begin to grapple with this.

One male per territory land owners; owned females --no leaving of land; one son only.

It is either the above or snowballing to femdom borg hive.

Think gorilla-ocray [one adult male per group] replacing chimp ocracy [many males in hierarchy with constant coup d eta].

(Snowballing collateral damage of gorilla-ocracy is trend towards dopey-laziness. Snowballing collaterol damage of chimp trend is democracy/feminism.)

Your choice...

-----------

The long term preventative solution is everybody needs to be made the same (through bio tech or severe heavy duty nurture controls) or we need thick culls each generation in childhood (so as to protect the good seed /children from the coalitions of envious vengeful idiots and weaklings).

How to get to that solution there is more difficult.

---------
I say --paraphrasing the Steve Martin caveman bit from old SNL --'down with free range pussy'.

If that winds up creating dysgenics where too many fool males breed, then we need eugenics to redress that.

We shouldn't just hope that after female liberation and dispersal that the 'best males' will by picked at the 'thumpa thumpa' club.

Alpha Beta Gamma (Omega) Dynamic

The "Alpha Beta Gamma Dynamic" (sometimes called "alpha beta omega" by plagiarizers; but that's okay so long as it spreads):

Underling males --kept alive by human success-- ousted overling males to get some sex. This started a social pattern. Human intelligence was able to see a tactic and repeat it.

This is called the "alpha beta gamma dynamic". Beta males rouse up gamma rabble (getting ever larger because of human success at food and environment control) and use them to oust the alpha (strutting presumptuous peacocks). _Then the beta become the alpha and are in turn ousted by the same tactic snowballing over the generations._

It is that that made white humans as smart as they are. One doesn't need to be [i]this[/i] smart to simply be an apex predator in temperate and cold clim.

Well that political dynamic /sexual tactic kept snowballing until we lost control-over/respect-from the females.

http://seanmaccloud.blogspot.com/2009/10/how-and-why-feminism-happened.html

=============
(Again...)

Alpha are strutting around getting sex.

Beta (a little marginal sexually) conspire with gamma (full marginal, sexually).

Together beta and gamma are able to topple the alpha.

Now --if the critters are smart enough to memorize pattern-- the cycle will continue.

The beta will become the alpha, the top portion of the gamma will become the new beta and will conspire with the gamma to oust the latest alpha.

That coalition-conspiring game is called politics. Chimps do it; dolphins do it; various monkey species do it. Other species form political coalition --as a way of keeping out-group males away from captured females-- but don't have as much internal coup d eta vibe; eg lions(who run the young males['beta' in this instance] off effectively), cheetah males.

I assert --and I'm not alone-- that the AlphBetGam(/Ome) Dynamic snowballed into a runaway train that selected for the super amount of intellect humans have now. It wasn't simply tool use or the cold that selected for the craftiest pups from our litters.

I assert that now that cycle of coup d etas has snowballed and undermined men themselves. Specifically the ABG Snowball made us so infantile (through the snowball of ousting chiefs) that we fell under the most aggressive/masculine females.

This really shouldn't be that confusing or controversial.


^V^V^V^V^V^V^V^
==============


Pro-fem is not suppose to make any sense; it's not trying to.

It is the side effect of the techno snowball (ever piling up antlers of human male competition waged over the hen house) allowing runt males to win the ascendancy battles.

Once the runt males took over the dog pack, the adult females of the pack --the "bitches" (heh)-- were the only pack members left that still had adult-like fangs.

Small and feminine --ie inept and daft-- as these fangs were (and are) they are still the biggest teeth left in the pack, given that the males have seen to their own neutering through their techno-supported battles. With the snowballing power of females in society/ the family --and the profound (not understood by me or anyone else) psychology and hormone shaping implications of that--the males have further become neutered.

All the "politics" and "philosophy" of the last few centuries are just the barking and howling noises at "the kill" as the bitches (the only real adults left in the pack) nip the runt males (the only type of male left in the white human dog-pack) into compliance.

Since these philosophical and political beliefs are just barking and howling noises --the 'grrs' at "the kill"-- it is not surprising these philosophies are self contradicting ONE HUNDRED PERCENT of the time. They're not trying to make any sense.

I don't know why everyone doesn't already know this for themselves.

Oh!... The reason is the neo cortex has _already_ become extinct. The couple of freaks like me are like so many Neanderthal roaming alone in the final days of that breed...

Death to democracy!

=======

IQ, dysgenics, red hair and testosterone (and more)

I basically agree that low 120ish is a great IQ to have in the Euro-sphere in this day and age: smart enough but not maladjusted.

That is why eugenics is so necessary. We need to move the mode to the right on the bell curve chart.

Merit is relative; it has to do with what the arena is. Change the arena and you change what is alpha pup and what is dead runt.

I believe for _Euro Caucasoids_ the chiefs of yore were 135ish; shamans were 140ish (or just 135 add 'lactose intolerance' or etc) and the tribe males were 120ish. (The rest were dead. We keep the dead alive now in a humongous dysgenic serfdom where fancy talk covers up the word "cat herded serfdom".)

Today, the leaders/professionals etc are 120 ish(or less!), the tribe is 100 or worse(!) the 135s are deemed the cosmic enemies of all mankind's history and the 141ish are the runty, ring-kissing, _cowed_ neurons of a giant body no one ever advocated or understands. (Above that set are newly kept alive poor fucks that only survive now because of the new environment (modern civilization).)

This is all easy to investigate --if liberalism (and its tendency to convolute and distort) is quashed:

Test and observe the children (3-11 years old).

Observe natural pecking order issues.

I assert the class leader males will be 135 ish. (Children naturally follow the kid with 'IT'; 'it' according to the old measure of men from which we come and are still an echo of.)

Then follow these kids around for life. I bet those leader males are ousted during puberty in favor of dumber conformity controllers.

(This is true even without non white ethnics dumbing up the soup I assert. Ie this trend starts before their introduction.)

Further, the ousted males don't go on to be the "corporate heads" or political heads or any leaders above board. (They probably are still leaders of their circles --since pack males naturally defer to `cache; or they are loners.)

This ousting-the-born-leaders-and-replacing-with-fools thing is what democracy (and civilization in general) aspires to do by _stated goal_ and design. So if what I'm saying is not happening then democracy is failing at its goal.

---------------
I've already noted that politician-IQ-reports are usually high; absurdly so. They are created by partisans.

We don't hear about anglo western pols' real IQs because they are low (115 to 120 ish?). The "dictators" were much higher I assert. And that doltishness is not a coincidence: it is what democracy is.

Suspected Bell Curve mode avgs for classes:

(I just make everything up... But I'm still right...)

-white masses 102 [a newly kept alive thralldom]
-military and police 110 [pre history early history's tribal warrior mass; now tweaked in their morphologies: namely they are simple-focused, like immune cells are simple-focus amoeba (as dogs are specialized/tamed wolves)]
-politicos and media 115-123 [rabble rousers of the "alpha beta gamma dynamic" (coup d eta chimp system); courtly sycophants of medieval dynasty system]
-CEOs and professionals[lawyers] 120-126 (professionals are high) [just right for the new world order going on centuries now; more courtly vestiges yore]
-comedians 125-130 [hmmm...]
-artists 131-135 [old shamans and chiefs, functioning on charisma and aptitude display]
-scientists 140 [old shamans (and chiefs)]
-poor bastards

----------------------------
IQ tests are not the be all end all. Yes the jews are sophister convoluters and distorters but they do point at truths (that's why they are effective demagogues):

People are like bar graphs of traits. And then there is very _relevant_ Nurture Syndrome (which is real and NOT the same as that B.S. liberal "blank slate").

Nurture Syndrome = like callouses or lead paint, but even more profound and extensive --glandular and neurologic habituation etc.


"Emotional IQ" is jew sophistry. The end result of that "research" as far as I can tell is 'dumb liars make more functional citizens' [and wimmins]. The fact jews don't then go on to deconstruct that by saying "citizenship --like any other measuring stick-- is a relative test which says more about the tester than anything else" even though it is their raison d tre to deconstruct just like that exposes their hypocrisy once again.

All that above there complexifies simple IQ assertions. I say that, even though I am a genius. It is just that I have seen people as smart as me and smarter (@#*! :-) ) not get simple stuff because of their cowardliness or testosterone issues or other bio-soup issues. (Eg bench warmer issues in childhood or physiological cognitive blind spots cause warped lensing.) If we had to pick a simple selection criteria I guess IQ would be best... "Let's just get it over and done with and we'll recon with details about the survivors later".)

I do say again, "merit" is relative; it has to do with what the arena is. Change the arena and you change what is alpha pup and what is dead runt.

Conservatives have a hubris about their good luck (and mediocrity!).

Also when talking about _group_ intelligence one NEEDS to state the curve slope not just the "mode". Is it soft knee or sharp like North East Asia? (where few people above 123 exist, all clustered around 109).
(Compare Eurosphere: where there is ca 13% above 121; but an abysmal horde down at 100.) I still don't know the black curve and I've been around race sites for a while now. Do any race types even know it?

~~~~~~
**Note it is not the 'Mean'. Mean is standard division: how many times up to bat compared to how many hits. 'Mode' is for plurality sets.

It is scary that college people who study this don't know that.

[...T'is all part of the english/french/dutch vibe to corrupt their schema. Maintaining consistency is "oppressive". An example is their spelling and pronunciation systems which have absolutely gutted the concept of phonetibet...]

If anyone knows why "mean" is used instead of "mode" I'd like to know.

---------
Also what exactly is the mechanism for this "regression to the mean" which is used?

What is probably meant is dumb people adopted into smart families are still dumb (same for anyone). Ie you demonstrate liberals are full of blank slate hogwash.

Well yes. But I assure all that people's sperm don't just magically 'regress to the mode', just because the environment is now selecting for dunce and breeding the intelligent chiefs of yore into extinction.

Smart people generate sperm (and egg) that codes for clever more often than do dumb folks. If not, then "evolution" wouldn't work like it does. ['evolution" = variant pups and selection; niche-stasis (temporary) creates snowballs of morphologic(shape/qualities) tweaking].

(Also when talking about breeding, there is the "Liger" thing ["recombinant gender sorting"]. The fact we don't know more about that very relevant part of inheritance is all part of that sophister-convoluter-distorter thing. That is why it was important to keep "them" out.)

___________________
===================
RED HAIR STUFF

Red hair doesn't guarantee high IQ. But what it does is it effects the nervous system. Or rather the chemicals that make red hair etc effect the nervous system in a way that leads to more exchange between the neurons more quickly.

There have been papers about that --especially from Britain. (Where else? lol) Note it was framed as "redheads are more susceptible to pain than everyone else", for PC reasons.

Note --and everyone should already know this-- cutaneous system and nervous system are the same in the womb.

Red haired females seem to express this tendency differently. Meaning --and to be as curt as I am with gulls-- they often appear very ditzy. I wonder why. (Testosterone or etc mitigates redhair chemicals?)

Red head chemicals are simply one feature of a complex soup called that individual. But if those red hair type chemicals are there it gives the nervous system a boost in addition to what ever that individual's aptitude was going to be anyway --making it more responsive to stimuli (and quicker at laying in memory).

Search for it. Especially if you're a red head. I save nothing because I would never pay Mankind the compliment.

==========
"T" IS FOR TESTOSTERONE

Testosterone in the womb and testosterone flood in early puberty are two different things.

That has been explained before. But there are so many studies and so much distraction and bunk, things get lost on top of getting stomped. (It's just like there are too many entertainment choices.)

So if a man is high IQ and High T, it probably is womb testosterone rather than the puberty infusion (puberty infusion being equated with brutish male or female thuggery). (In short in-utero T creates the systems of the body early on; puberty T acts like a hormone which shapes behavior.)

High T womb are often bald.

Testos is not the simple PC buzz word it has been demonized as.

It is more complicated; in a complicated nurture soup that mitigates it further.

Testos is what makes men smarter than females. (Cell and tissue, organ and system formation itself in the womb.) It's what makes the best men very smart and virile [and braggarts in front of pussy too].

What people are trying to express through the demonization of T is... male puberty has always been a quandary for civilization. Ie quandry for the aging en statused males who want to maintain their _sedentary_ rank [access to sex] as the young princes roar in the night for the [sexual] territory.

Fine. But it is a question of who's going to deal with that 'problem' (of males maturing). ?Men who have the best interest of their sons* --ie their own continuation-- at heart when they organize up some kind of 'social contract'**? Or will it be ethnic aliens who want to geld the host culture males; or female wallflowers with ax to grind issues; and/or other females(basically normal) who are simply envious and angry at boys?

(These 'other females(basically normal)' are confused and dualistic in their anger and demand for male-stunting, since females still expect boys to become men in order to be worth anything. ...Reason number four billion six hundred [and] fifty two why females should not be in charge of anything or be considered "philosophers".)

_________
[*Fathers are a threat to sons as sons are a threat to fathers. This has always been the THING. Whether literally in a family or abstractly between the generations. Take many mammals as ex: Either the adult male runs the young male(s) off the land or the younger run(s) the adult off; Humans have complexifed /muddy that like we do everything --with our specially designed complexifier growing on our shoulders.

Man has not dealt with this well. ...Constant coup d eta and counter-strategy snowballs and pendulums have complexified to the point a female hyper-leverage _hive structure_ developed.

That above is what I'm getting at when I talk of MY "alpha beta gamma theory" of human evolution and civic/political snowballs.]

[**Note many/most fathers are already princess-spoiling enablers.]

=================
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Alpha beta gamma Stuff.

Faculties etc are "liberal" because they are the ascendant beta males (lower testosterone) of the recent coup d etas.

"Liberalism" is the desire to marginalize 'high T' males. The expression of that fear and desire is all the liberal canards, lies and protectionist political-coalition tactics.

An endless string of coups make up history yes. But the recent coups were specifically called parliament-democracy and liberalism.

Note National Socialism was a counter-coup movement comprised of what I call 'continental late Jacobins'(whether they know it or not). It was beaten back; mankind is still reeling from that.

Capitalism is part of the low T fear and desire too; it needed to clear the Highlands (high T males) to create a safe environment for 'commerce' back in actual Jacobin days.

This exposes the root false dichotomy between 'conservatives" and liberals. This is why the lower "right" (usually neo masculine rebellions[whether they know it or not]) can't win.

The above are all just the latest vocabulary words for a dynamic that is ancient.

The wandering jews just complexify this being both beta male types And enemy aliens who have a need to geld host culture rams.

We don't know what I'm talking about because no one is self aware enough or honest enough --or consistent enough in their own made up BS ("science"/antropology/sociology/ HBD)-- to frame it this way.

How and why feminism happened

Feminism happened because we keep alive too many weakling idiotic males in childhood.

Wolves see the steppe a certain way _as a natural side effect of their bio chemistries_ (eyesight for example). If chihuahua variants (different bio chemical combinations) start thriving from the litter, the steppe would be seen differently as a side effect of those new chemistries thriving.

Now, understand that white humans who use to die all the time throughout white history now live and thrive. These new strains are the liberals. They see the world differently as a fundamental side effect of their bio chemistries. They hate men like Chihuahua's yelp and growl at German Shepherds.

Everything else happening is unwitting exploitation of human instincts for: female sexual value, conformity or tribe protection/rallying (eg male 'honor' impulse), brain modules for wishful thinking('religion'), gullibility.

Female mammals\most reptiles are dualistically submissive --they hate you for the very display in you that they desire; ie they hate you for it 'after wards'.

The more infantile males act, the more females will be _triggered_ into not liking them and trying to dominate --grabbing for their own masculinity ("filling the vacuum" thus exposing 'equality' gibberish for the ill thought through unachievable absurdity that it is).

The more dominant the males act/display, the more females will _instinctually_ submit (with their highknees in the air --fact).

!Problem is... that in a group based species like ours, the males cap each others' sexual displays, [alpha beta gamma, coup d eta stuff] making most males Non-dominant in their displays (even or especially the 'winners' given our foppish abstract/money status system which we males unwittingly snowballed into as a direct side effect of the endless and ancient struggle to cap each others' displays/ status-/sex- bids.). This then triggers females autonomically/ deterministically into their own dominance attempt /display.

Think dog packs...

Once the runt males took over the dog pack [symptom of the males pulling each other down and _parameterizing each others' paths to ascendancy_, where runt is the only type ironically non-vulnerable enough to get to the top], the adult females of the pack --the "bitches" (heh heh)-- were the only pack members left that still had adult-like fangs.

All the "politics" and "philosophies" of the last few centuries are just the growling noises at "the kill" as the bitches (the only real adults left in the pack) nip and bite the runt males (the only type of male left at the top of the white human dog-pack) into compliance.

Then that unravels the "family" (given that the male coyote is run off the territory by the female after knotting/breeding --since she's tougher than him now or than he's allowed to be) causing the next generation to be unbreedable with (in our human 'acultured'/learned system).

Atlas shrugging...

...Now we all --the John Galt-ocracy-- wait for the worms to rot the structure.

It's the way Rome fell...

Males cap each others' masculine displays;
females become _instinctively_ emboldened: triggered to apathy towards and dominance over males;
next generation (of social incompetoids and un en statused ex-conformists) shrugs to make it [the 'corruption'] all go away.

Ya dig?

(...Hardly, I'm sure. ...Though I'll be plagiarized anyway, at the academic level by that gaggle of runts, trying to steal the 'magic' and win some dames for themselves.)

===============
Too many weak [Jew] males survived back then (city living) and then consequently SUCCUMBED to female sexual leverage.

Then that "meme" spread through standard natural selection selecting between hive strategies (with the complex fem-right cities beating simpler tribes).


And a related note...

"Morals" are bio determinism; they are not arbitrarily embraced.

As Europe became less hungry, people softened up deterministically. Success leads to "fat and happy" sappiness.

---------
Multi cellularism, might be an emergent property of the Universe itself.

Fundamentals / Prerequisites.

~>PREREQUISITE PRINCIPLES:

-The First Principle is 'cause and effect'. It means nothing acts without something acting upon it. Like domino effects or billiard ball bank shot chain reactions.

B- There is a finite/limited amount of energy ultimately [in the end]. Ie if there is more steam there is always less ice and vice versa. (Replace the words 'steam and ice' with what ever; eg force and matter, gas and solid, this or that chemical compound [tinker toy arrangements of molecules, giving off unique to that pattern hums that attract and repel other hums].) More of one thing = less of some other arrangement of stuff.

-Natural Selection. This is the Second Principle of the universe after cause and effect/limited energy Principle.

.Different baby variations form. (because of cause and effect)
.Only some live and pass on their unique arrangements.
."Environment" selects. (Environments [arrangements of energy flow] are always varying too [like cloud formations in the sky], also because of cause and effect.)

Use this knowledge for good and not evil, Grass Hopper. (I for one will be using it for evil. Hence my cry of "cull back the masses, before it's too late".)

------
->Female sexual value.

->And male combat over it. Either as individuals (eg deer) or in groups. Few males win; most lose.

-If in groups, that selects for male variations who engage in schmoozing and compromise (simply 'sharing'). (Parallels to hive social dynamics and multi cellularism (simply 'body') metabolisms then can be seen.)

-The groups are variation assembly line machines fighting (directly or indirectly) other group variants. (Natural Selection will select the winner group variant.)

-Inside the group there is an 'alpha beta gamma' hierarchy where coup d eta civil war --_and counter strategy suppression_-- is always brewing.

-If the male vs male combat becomes more display based[eg birds] than direct engagement based [eg bears], the so called female 'handicapping' principle takes over: simply females choose the 'winner' male variation rather than being chosen by the best male warrior variations.


===============
From memory...

[All this is online at reputable places.]

'super' and 'sub' affixes affect these headings...

KINGDOM
Animalia (predators as separate from photosynthesis)
(sponge, coral, and their jellyfish, worms, molluscs, arthrodpods, vertebrates, starfish; note around upper coral, self moving multicellular predators form --important)
PHYLUM
chordata [these come from mullosc-like worms (most animals are worms) --but that takes us into evolution not just naturalist taxonomy.]
(-sub: vertebrates)
CLASS
Mammalia
-sub: placentalia (also marsupials and monotremes [platypus])
ORDER
Primate (lemurs etc)
-super family: pongoid ("Apes" --tailess primates)
FAMILY
Hominoidea (biped apes)
GENUS
Homo
SPECIES
Sapiens

-----
Race (all this gets loose):

Caucasoid
Europid
Nordic
Indo European

~'Celt-Nord with vestigial Cromagnid' (=fancy talk for the skull type human females still find attractive.)

=====
I would add sexual types to that.

Namely...
.A-sexual (clone /self-splitters -most lifeforms)
.Sexual (most animals)

-hermaphrodites (sponge, coral, jellyfish, worms, molluscs)
-dimorphic sexuality (boy girl reproduction. Most arthropods, vertebrates. For these animal types, it starts with emasculation attacks symptomatic of their moving predation lifestyles).

~temperature (or energy/food acquisition)-created gender. (Reptiles/nesters etc)
~Y chrom/genetic-created gender. (Upper mammals AND through parallelism some insects [phylum: arthropods; class: insecta]!)

Note that reproduction is the most fascinating subject but least explored. Much parallelism; eg proto dimorphic sex formed in "pond scum" (one-celled specialist-breeding between multiple species in symbiosis with each other!) but modern vetebrate dim sex comes from totally different and much later branch.

=====

Firstly:

"Objective" is tough. Relativism is always lurking.

_BUT_... these are OUR relative designations and therefore valid in and of themselves!

These classifications will modify over time as "paradigm shifts".

We want them to only shift according to OUR standards and observations. We must fight to keep alien --"Marxist" --paradigm shifts out. (Last time we fought, you jebus dolts fought for our enemies. Everything has sucked ever since. You all --christers-- complain about the modern world we live in but you are oblvious to the fact you have done it yourselves. You have done it to us all. There will be a reckoning...)

Others that don't like our relative designations and classifications can go to death camps where they can grapple with the error that was their attempts to replace our relative constructs WITH THEIR relative constructs.

Secondly:

Genetic cladistics (biochemical dissection) is replacing taxonomy (study of skeleton similarities and subtle differences) to classify into groups.

=====
Final note about "parallelism" (some call it "convergence" which I dislike)...

Simply the phenom where a 30million year old dolphin (from coast-living proto-dog-thang) looks like >400million year old shark (from early fish).

This parallelism creates problems for taxonomists, since they look at morphological shapes (creature's parts) to classify: The seen similarities might be symptom of similar niches rather than family relationship. Genetic cladistics seeks to cure that classification problem.

----------
As an exercise, figure out why dolphins and sharks have similar morphologies.

(Hint-- use NATURAL SELECTION theory...

1-) Different variations are born to a litter (they look, act and feel-inside different because of their different chemical compositions); 2-) only a small portion live; 3-) the niche they live in decides life and death.

Niches change over time but some remain consistent.

The fundamental motor of the Universe is "cause and effect" --billiard balls on a table... ricocheting, bank shot after bank shot forever. That ever continuing domino effect motion creates the varying niches and varying pups o'the litters.)

------------
Use this Knowledge for good and not evil...

(And don't forget, junior...




"SATAN! SATAN! SATAN!")

=============


"Adaption" and "Evolution"

Nothing "adapts". That is not the way evolution works.

Natural selection is the way "evolution" works and it aint pretty. (There are other complexity systems too--none of them are touchy feel-y either.)

"Adaption" is classic liberal wordplay to trick people away from the truth of how "evolution" works, because liberals don't like the facts as much as christers don't.

When creatures 'evolve' from one form to another, what happens is environments change and consequently most pups die/drown, while some freaks/runts who normally didn't thrive go on to be the new top dog strains of that new niche.

_And no utopias happen in the offing._ Amphibians are every bit as cruel as the deep blue past was; And Romans were every bit a deadly as cromags; ...as the lingering cavalry fort [ie the city] is every bit as deadly and oppressive as the Indians were.

So if society IS "evolving", no one is magical adapting. We are simply creating a world hostile to certain types (ie killing strains that don't fit anymore) so that other types can thrive. The sewer, of have-n-have-not brutality called the city, is the new 'utopia'.

Welcome to what liberalism's progress really means.

And note that I don't care what your professors or pastors think: they are wrong and should be in political reeducation camps.

--------
Don't post some nonsense response about how "they aint got no profes for ebolution --and give me back my stems!"

You conservatives --ie natural born dunces-- need to get your heads out of the philosophical and psychological hole you hide in.

As an exercise towards that end, stop fighting liberalism's wars for it.

---------
>Creationist said: "And [science tech fraud] tends to indicate that attempting to construct an objective moral standard for Man based on science would not merely fail, but prove downright
>disastrous."

So you're saying that observations of other mammal social groupings are so inaccurate and lied about that conclusions drawn from those observations could never be used to understand more about the human condition from an outside looking in perspective?

And note the only people lying about mammal social dynamic (and the socio- and psycho- babble implications) are marxists (ie jews) and their fellow travelers.

_Creationism keeps fighting the wars to keep those marxists in power over science-conclusions but then complains that science says things that are dangerous to conservative values._ (Read that sentence again.)

That is why creationism MUST go as a pre requisite to stopping "Marxism" (ie modern liberalism --feminism, affirmative action, immigration etc). (NOTE marxism is NOT Russian tank armies from the 50s-80s; marixsm is american 20th century liberalism which American white males/Christians keep fighting FOR. Creationists are doing that because they are susceptible to confusion; that is the same confusion tendency that hampers their grasping the simple Natural Selection concept.)

(And note the only thing that has "proved downright disastrous" so far is the american religious zeitgeist and parliamentary democracy in general.)

=============
CHOICE CREATIONIST QUOTES

[quote]Supposing Dawkins and Darwin are impostors [/quote]

Wouldn't change a thing. (BTW, FYI to all, as far as I can tell dawkins is a feminist.)

Reality doesn't come from books.

I don't recite back what I read in some books. I understand what I do cause what I do understand is obvious.

You are congenitally predisposed to not get it and to not want to get it.

Along with chivalry, that is Western Mans' fatal flaw.

-------

[quote]
Classic Conspiracy Theory,...
[/quote]

LOL. Seriously.

[quote]
...Classic Conspiracy Theory, used to refer to Darwin, Marx and Freud as the three thinkers who’d unshipped the rudders of European civilisation. [sic] Personally I’d add the insane moralist (NB NOT “philosopher") Nietzsche into the mix.
[/quote]

And the God Fearing US/Brit nutters fought against the Third Reich which was going to right the ship (and keep the true epiphanies).

So there you go.

How's that working out for ya?...

Jesus saves?

---------
[quote]Surely the fact that a bunch of amoebas that suddenly got wise and moved about a bit and grew white skin and hair and teeth and learned to walk and talk is now giving way to another bunch that grew black skin and all the other accoutrements should be accepted as part of the great (but ultimately meaningless) progress, destiny, whatever, that results from Natural Selection?
[/quote]

"Suddenly got wise"

Imbecile.

You don't understand Natural Selection or naturalism at all and therefore mis characterize it with strawmen, that I guess work out in the stycks of that `god forsaken hell hole once called america, but it doesn't work with even the mildly lucid.

-----------

[quote]
If Dawkins is correct in deriving from his Darwinian positions the belief that “the universe that we observe has precisely the properties that we should expect if there is at bottom, no design, no evil and no good, nothing but blind pitiless indifference”
[/quote]

Well known. One of Dawkins' better observations.

"indifference"

Why don't you see it yourself?

[quote]
Then WHY should anyone bother about The Decline of the West?
[/quote]

`Cause I want to live and thrive. I don't want to be "ugly ducklinged" out of my own home pond. (Also I don't want the inherent character flaws of my females --though adaptive, as part of that grand indifference-- to get away with "it"; also the human condition regarding reproduction in general --and all it entails (mostly pain --catalystic as ever-- on one plane or another)-- needs to be solved --for the good of everybody.) Period.




=============
As for not seeing the soundness of cause and effect "materialism"...

You don't think the universe is generally as big as 'we' think it is? Same with the time scale?

You don't think weather is cause and effect on the scale of hot and cold creating currents? Same for earth quakes and volcanoes. You don't think mudslides and floods etc are "domino-effect" movements?

You can't put together for yourself how the movements of people, creatures and things --all of which are chemical composites-- are the continuations of movements from previous days and then previous days before that?

Now if the Uni is that big and old, any self aware creator entity which could grapple with all of its movements over that span must be magnifico in the extreme. Does it make sense that "red in tooth and claw" would be the cosmos-wide motor of this loving fatherly protector being?

Now you say "Satan did that red in tooth and claw jazz".

Okay but Is "God" too weak to stop `him? And didn't the great savant --who created satan, according to your particular myth (which just recently comes from a previous one called Zeus and Prometheus) --see that his throne bare-ing class was prone to pilfering?

As far as Natural Selection (which is cause and effect on the bio-chemical [carbo nitro atom] scale) --"Darwinism"...

You don't think dog breeds come from wolves through selectively picking certain traits over others? Same for horse breeds and grass/wheat/rice. _You don't think that that process of "only some traits getting to breed" applies to other organisms over more generations, as selected by the cause and effect domino effect movements of their surrounding locales/environments?_

You don't think human babies are chemical variants? You think all babies go on to do equally well at passing on their genes/ideas? (Ideas/memes are a symptom of the chemical composites we call genes.)

======
NATURAL SELECTION…

1) Different variations are born to a litter (they look, act and feel-inside different because of their different chemical compositions);
2) only a small portion live;
3) the niche they live in decides life and death.

Niches change over time.

The fundamental motor of the Universe is “cause and effect” --billiard balls on a table… ricocheting, bank shot after bank shot forever. That ever continuing domino effect motion creates the varying niches and varying pups o’the litters.

Parallelism: The phenom where a 30million year old dolphin (from coast-living proto-dog-thang) looks like >400million year old shark (from early fish).

---------
Technology and wisdom in general is the Luciferean Apple yes. (If this loving protector god of yours wasn’t an A class prick Man wouldn’t grab it so readily.)

At any rate the techno snowball and a philosophical ontological understanding (eg natural selection) are not the same things. We can destroy ourselves --or a part of ourselves-- with the crazy train techno snowball but the facts of nature we have observed can still BE RIGHT too. (We can’t just hide our heads in holes and pretend truth hasn’t been seen.)

If we are to protect ourselves from the crazytrain snowball And at the same time accept what we now know to be true too, maybe we need to shale off atavistic (obsolete vestigial) christian sentiment, see a little means and end justification and throw down in un jesus-like, undemocratic ways, Third Reich style.

"Success comes most swiftly and completely not to the greatest or perhaps even to the ablest men, but to those whose gifts are most completely in harmony with the taste of their times."

[quote from vox popoli page, christian site]

That is absolutely correct.

It is very important for all everywhere to understand, now that humans are so purposefully in charge of the "tastes of the time".

What we breed for will be made by our own hands now not god's nature. Man must come to terms with that.

One little, two little, three little waves of feminism...

The acceptance of so called '1st wave feminism' is dangerously confused. It is our condoning of 1st wave that led _INEVITABLY_ to so called 2nd wave, 3rd, and ad nauseum feminism.

Economy types frame the issue incorrectly --like liberal utopians and creationists. Therefore they [all] don't see it accurately.

It is not a question of "right" to make "equal pay for equal work". There is no right to work (or education, or any other pretense or poltical conceit humans hold dear)! Work is something men do to compete over female "hypergamy" tendencies ( = discriminatory up based infidelity ['up' is case specific/caprice]).

..."Female deer have a 'right' to grow antlers" : "female humans have a 'right' to ride a horse into battle [swords a cleaving]". It doesn't make any sense. [Note male deer are fighting each in headbutt suomo competition _over_ female wandering tendencies. Antlers have been selected in only males as the unwitting tool of success. It was not a conspiracy to keep females out of anything. Same with sapien competition.]

Few males win and _most lose_ --EVEN WITHOUT Feminism's amplification of that Problem. (Note 'problem' is a relative construct.)

Taking status positions away from males simply pushes more males into the loser pit.

Then even worse, giving the status positions to females (rather than say Jackie Robinson) --earned or not-- causes females to raise "the price"[tm]. Thereby causing even more men --who weren't immediately pushed into the loser pit-- to become losers too in comparison to the ascended presumptuous --now untouchable-- females.

...Giving princess even more mattresses between her and the pea causes her to be even more of a self entitled colicky bitch.

This increase of fem sexual value (fem sexual mobility) causes men then to have to do even more to win female positive attention (given her flaws and hypergamic instincts).

But... our culture has specialized in keeping men from fighting each other directly. So the way men now try to win and balance out ever increasing female sexual value (made possible by 1st wave and its precursor prerequisites) is to defer to (and often rally around, ala Stockholm syndrome) female egomania and discriminatory caprice even more. (Male _display_ as 'mano a mano' combat: See bird social dynamics --with their well known female-run infidelity.) This creates a vicious snowball of "waves".

And here we is now...

Do you understand?

And none of this even addresses female aptitude shortcomings --and the necessary accommodations imposed by the _lucky_ typically en-hubris-ed elite men left, trying to be useful to an untouchable colicky princess. Accommodating these feminine "issues" has mad-ing-ly convoluted the previous political conceits of "equality" and constitutionality, causing mass malaise and Nihilist hopelessness.

---------
And note, replacing males of the hive-vs-hive caste structures with female mediocres in everything has proved itself to be more economically successful than anything in history not less. So trying to stop "2nd and 3rd etc wave" by saying it's bad for business is wrong.

Europe and diaspora has the most successful cup-runneth-over hive structure ever on this planet (excepting multi cellular bodies). I declare that untethered female hypergamic 'right' (made possible by their economic/education/political leverage) is inseparably connected to that hive success story...

...Snowballing male fear mixed with their parametrized hyper competition:

Gilligan peddling his treadmill bike ever faster in a desperate bid to still get laid (trying to catch a carrot that moves ever one step faster than him) ...and Professor's radio consequently going louder and louder and blender going faster and faster. Europe's entrepreneurial inventive success in a poetic nut shell there.

But western culture's economic win-fall is still bad for men. (And one shouldn't need to be Valerie Solanece to see that.)

Economic arguments are a losing pony at stopping social change in general and male marginalization specifically. Just like capitalists' strip-mining and individualism arguments have always been. So at least capitalism's losing political record will be unblemished.

And the angry lower males will try to unseat the 'winners' with even more civil war coup urgency. And disenfranchised pit males will shirk civic comportment all together. So therefore keeping men down now is much better for business and "conservatives" than stopping females. Easily.

Until the worms arrive.

All made possible by simply gullibly falling for boopsy's pouty face and the cries of "she just wants to [pretend] she's a doctor too; golly." 1st wave nonsense, where achievement is a "right" [political conceit] rather than a competition side effect. ...Competition over boopsy's pouty little bullshit ever one step ahead.

Affirmative Action and female competence.

Even if fems are capable, that doesn't make AA any less treasonously, criminally unconstitutional (not that I would lower myself down to that shit rag).

It simply is not "justice" to have these over-seeing bate-and-switch elites do this to society when the dumb ass buffoons of the military throughout our history did NOT fight for any of this! (I'm looking at you 'band of dingbats'.)

Nor did the dumb ass voters vote for any of this.

It is all fiat, imposed from power-posts achieved through relying on protectionist demagoguery (coming from all quarters not just politicos) which got under the skin of the cumbaya jebus continent** and also effortlessly "triangulated**" against the easily demonize-able capitalist strip-mine greed vision.

[**cumbaya jebus continent = ...jebus cult is marxism v1.0 --created by the same race of wandering trouble makers then and now -- and its followers are sappy blushy Nords bred by it into simple/dunce cumbaya-ites. Is it any wonder modern marxism was so easily able to find ear with it?]

["**triangulated" = big-tent coalition stuff --chimps picking bugs off each other.]

---
AA is not about fem aptitude. Spinning it that way doesn't address the points I made (_very clearly_) in the 'waves of feminism' post:

Achievement is not a Right. It is competition side effect _over_ girls (sneaky as ever they were).

If girls _are_ being picked (for positions they DON'T need) boys are _not_ being (for positions they DO).

And that is a double bad because of female instincts (we live in ignorance/denial of); eg 'shit test' --which the males fail now-- and hypergamy.

Once again the issue is framed wrong.

"They don't need to worry about the answers if they get you to ask the wrong questions."

-------

I find females competent. But note the new roles are easy to handle (alas 'tis civilization's goal). Bob Cratchit use to do every thing the modern world uses a room full of gossiping chicken heads to do now -- except he didn't have any coal!

And further the dysgenic population explosion of dopey males makes many females seem more desirable in positions.

Parliamentary democracy has created a world of labrador males vs female border collies --with the male border collies being marginalized to the homo sovieticus** gulags.

["**homo sovieticus" = like that Full Metal Jacket scene at the lime trench.]

Female border collies are still border collies and as such are smarter than male labradors. But we are replacing male border collies (smarter still) to create this unasked for utopia.

Note though I'm looking forward to the military and police being over 50% female soon. ;-)

(My screed against parliamentary democracy is wrong. My Jacobin spite for parli-demo blinds me. It actually is civilization itself that is breeding for female border collies and male Labradors at the expense of the male border collie. Civi itself, unfortunately.)


===========
"could should" fallacy/conundrum...

I think military guys are absolute dunces. It is much easier to bring some liberals over to your view --if you have the gift (I do [haughty snort]) -- than a conformist dog on a leash; the dog waits for popularity to make the decision for him then he conforms to that.

But...

Once I was watching the boob tube. A military general was being asked by a congressional panel whether or not he could train females to be effective soldiers.

He hee'd and haw'd and they said "listen can you train a female --take your daughter for example-- to be a [femme nikita] or not?"

He pauses then goes "Yes. But why would I want to? Why would society want me to unleash that on it?"

They said "thank you, you're dismissed."

It is a "could should" issue.

We can replace males with females now (for the reasons I gave above-- "females competent enough now") but why should we?

Implications of the females are 'competent enough' approach:

A little pantomime to make it fun...

One day humans are brains in bubbles. I'm sure the females make fine brains in bubbles. But that is not the point. The point is if the male is still a male, he is going to have his brain-tongue hanging out for the female's medulla oblongata. Now 'being as all other things are equal' in bubbles, the female brain will, nature graphically tells us, lead him a popcorn trial back to her black-widow's spider web.

In a bubble.

....
So what is actually being advocated by the west?...

Should we vote on replacing males with females now since the females are so competent and all? ...It's not like they would use this new leverage to give men and boys new obstacles. [sarc]

Can the voting horde --and their media shyster handlers-- understand simple female-value and male-redundancy principle snowballing along to praying mantis social-dynamic parallels?

Can the masses contemplate that the only _real_ solution then is so called "transhumanism"? (Specifically getting rid of gender or etc to protect the next generation.) [...And for each new Promethean solution a new Pandora's box opened... snowballing along, Luciferianly over the roses of an imagined Eden.]

Is this what was fought for in any war or revolution ever?

[I guess I've snowballed into Luddite-ism now... But what are ya gonna do...]